26.12.2013 Views

Adaptivity with moving grids

Adaptivity with moving grids

Adaptivity with moving grids

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38 C. J. Budd, W. Huang and R. D. Russell<br />

It is interesting to point out that uniform convergence has been obtained<br />

by a number of researchers for equidistributing meshes determined apriori<br />

by the exact solution or the singularity information of the exact solution<br />

for singularly perturbed differential equations: e.g., see Sloan et al. (Qiu<br />

and Sloan 1999, Qiu, Sloan and Tang 2000), Mackenzie et al. (Mackenzie<br />

1999, Beckett and Mackenzie 2000, Beckett, Mackenzie, Ramage and Sloan<br />

2001b, Beckett and Mackenzie 2001a, 2001b, Mackenzie and Mekwi 2007b),<br />

and Huang (2005c). Convergence results are also obtained for a posteriori<br />

equidistributing meshes determined by computational solutions for differential<br />

equations in Babuška and Rheinboldt (1979), Kopteva and Stynes<br />

(2001), He and Huang (2009) and Huang, Kamenski and Lang (2009).<br />

2.8.2. Static interpolation error<br />

In higher dimensions it is very hard to obtain reliable estimates for the truncation<br />

error when solving a general PDE. A somewhat easier, but still very<br />

important, question to address is whether a mesh is suitable to approximate<br />

the solution of the PDE, in particular to interpolate the solution. We now<br />

consider this question.<br />

Suppose that the solution of the differential equation (or indeed any appropriate<br />

function defined in the physical domain) is given by u(x,y,...).<br />

For the case of a problem in two dimensions we can define the point values<br />

of u on the non-uniform mesh by<br />

U i,j = u ( X i,j ,Y i,j<br />

)<br />

.<br />

A natural measure of error is the interpolation error obtained by approximating<br />

u on the mesh <strong>with</strong> suitable functions using the above point values.<br />

Significant progress in finding meshes <strong>with</strong> good properties in reducing<br />

the interpolation error of a solution has been made in this direction in<br />

the past decade. Formulae giving the optimal monitor function to minimize<br />

this error over a suitable mesh have been developed based on interpolation<br />

error estimates by Huang and Sun (2003) in the H m -norm, Chen<br />

et al. (2007) in the L q -norm, Huang (2005a, 2005b) intheW m,q -norm,<br />

and Cao (2005, 2007a, 2007b, 2008) for higher-order interpolation in two<br />

dimensions. Formulae have also been developed based on an a posteriori<br />

error estimate for one dimension (He and Huang 2009), a hierarchical basis<br />

a posteriori error estimate (Huang et al. 2009), and semi a posteriori error<br />

estimates for variational problems (Huang and Li 2009). Formulae for<br />

the monitor functions in these cases can be obtained as follows (Huang and<br />

Sun 2003, Huang 2005a). A so-called anisotropic error bound, taking into<br />

consideration the directional effect of the error or solution derivatives, is first<br />

developed. This error bound can be regarded as a function of the monitor<br />

function M when only meshes satisfying the alignment and equidistribution

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!