3. - usaid
3. - usaid
3. - usaid
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
invasion of Nigeria1 s Md-West State in August 1967. Biafra accused Nigeria<br />
of genocide. In response, the Fa invited a team of observers fIwn Sweden,<br />
Poland, United Kingdom, and Canada, as well as the UN and the OAU, to<br />
investigate the charge. The teams reported fillding no evidence of genocide<br />
in the military operations.<br />
Reaction by WJ, OAU, Foreip Governments to Secession and Civil War<br />
United Nations<br />
The UN Secretary General sent a personal representative to Nigeria in<br />
August of 1968, who served as an observer in FMG Territory. The Nigerian<br />
war and humanitarian relief were not placed on the agenda of the General<br />
Assembly, but the Secretary General strongly urged that a peaceful settlement<br />
be sought through the Organization of mican Unity. UNICEF was active<br />
in providing food and medical supplies and air transport to both sides.<br />
FA0 authorized an emergency food allocation.<br />
Organization of Af'rican Unity<br />
The general position and attitude of the Organization of African Unity is<br />
to oppose any act of secession within an African country. In September of<br />
1967, the Heads of State of the OAU set up a Consultative Cornnittee composed<br />
of Ethiopia, Ghana, Congo (K), Niger, the Cameroon, and Liberia with a<br />
mandate to try to resolve the conf'lict within the framework of one Nigeria.<br />
This decision by the OAU was accepted by the Federal Government, and the<br />
Camittee met in Lagos in November. At that time General Ankrah of Ghana<br />
was delegated to try to bring the two sides together. He was unsuccessful,<br />
and for some time the OAU Camittee was inactive despite a nmber of efforts<br />
to stimulate new initiatives. During the course of these negotiations at<br />
Wala, Niamey, Addis Ababa, and Monrovia, the FMG made a nunber of proposals<br />
aimed at assuring the Ibos of their security witWn a united Nigeria.<br />
It proposed an international observer force to participate in overseeing<br />
the reintegration of the Ibos into Nigeria; a qualified amnesty; an Ibo<br />
police force to undertake a large part of the security responsibility in<br />
the Ibo heartland; non-discriminatory recWtment of Ibos into the Nigerian<br />
army and Federal civil service; and an Ibo Military Governor for the Ib<br />
populated East Central State with Ibo members on his Executive Council.<br />
These proposals were not acceptable to Biafra, which continued to insist<br />
that only through recognition of its sovereignty could the survival of its<br />
people be assured. While generally opposed to acceptance of an independent<br />
BiafYa, the OAU continues to seek a solution that might be acceptable to<br />
both sides.<br />
Af'rican Countries Sm~ortirw Biafra<br />
Of the forty members of the OAU, four, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Tanzania, and<br />
Zambia, recognize Biafran independence.