3. - usaid
3. - usaid 3. - usaid
mCRIFTION OF ?HE DISASTER Several countries in Africa suffered drought/food emergencies during fiscal year 1969 and are shown on the above map. Some of them requested and received food donations fm the USG. In ?he Gambia the prolonged lack of rain caused failure of maize and rice crops. The drop in rice production of 40-50 percent during 1969 created an acute food shortage. ACTION TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE GAMBIA In November 1968 a request was made by the GCYE for emergency diversion of USG cereals from Catholic Relief Services stocks on hand in the country to feed 75,000 people in Jam, Kiang, Niumi and Central Boddihu Provinces for a t h e mths period. In April 1969 further drought assistance was r+ quested fmm the World Food Program to feed a total .of 180,000 victims during the period of June through August 1969. ASSISTANCE PRCIVIIIED BY THE U. S. GOVERNMENT The USAID Food for Peace Officer met with Catholic Relief Services representative in Bathhurst in November of 1968 to discuss the food emergency with the GCYE. Catholic Relief Services indicated its willingness to use grains k.an its on-going programs, if the USG would later replace these gains. Approval was given by AID for diversion of 3,637,000 pounds of P. L. 480, Title 11, sorghum with an estimated market value of . . . $94,925 In April of 1969, the World Food Program approved a contribution to The Gambia of 4,320 metric tons of sorghum. It requested that the USG donate 3,240 metric tons of this amount, which was approved by AID. Estimted market value of the sorghum plus ocean freight was . . . . . . . . $324 000 TrieZ5 ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY U. S. VOLUNTARY AGENCDE Experienced Catholic Relief Services staff coordinated and assisted h the distribution of above USG P. L. 480 food. ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY OTHER NATIONS AND INIERNATIQNAL ORGANIZATIONS World Food h.oeram In addition to obtaining 3,240 metric tms of sorghum fmm the USG as a donation, the WFP purchased 1,080 metric tans of sorghum in France. Estimated market value - $66,310.
GHANA CHARA-TICS EYEN'I': Floods OF THE DISASTER DATGTlME : July-October , 1968 LOCATION: Volta, Western Central, Brong-Ahafo, Ashanti and Eastern Regions DISASTER No. Killed Number Evacuated VICTIMS: None 25,000 ESTIMATED PROPERTY DAMAGE: Dollar Damage 4,000 homes destroyed $ 1,400,000 Flood damage to roads and bridges 7,000,000 Foreign exchange loss due to severe damage to cocoa crop Other crop losses - maize, rice, 50,000,000 * guinea corn, millet, cassava, plantain 16,300 000 * vqmm * Represents value of loss f'rom comparison with 1967 output and prices. The econamic effect in the form of inflation and a higher cost of living was considerable. Also, Ghana was forced to utilize foreign exchange in 1969 to import food. DESCFUrnON OF THE DISASTER: The Ghana flood emergency was called a "creeping disaster." This was because the rains fell in unusual amounts for the entire rainy season. The slow rising floods occurred from July to October 1968, first jn one region and then in another. Roads and crops were washed out in one area; homes were destroyed in others. The disaster-was never a compact problem where it was easy to identify the persons affected, the assistance they required or the extent of the
- Page 2 and 3: ............................. .....
- Page 4 and 5: 4.5 million other vlctims. The case
- Page 6 and 7: has been undertaken by Ghana, Nepal
- Page 8 and 9: QUICK FACTS AND COMPAlusoNs Wer of
- Page 10 and 11: FISCAL YEAR 1969 ClMJLA'I'rUE DISAS
- Page 12 and 13: * Inccanplete or not reported. X un
- Page 16 and 17: damage. The 25,000 persons reported
- Page 18 and 19: "We believe that the limited funds
- Page 20 and 21: MALAGASY EVENT: DATE-TIME: Cyclone
- Page 22 and 23: Overflow of Ikopa River on Tananari
- Page 24 and 25: for this nso gesture of wendship wh
- Page 26 and 27: 3,500 pounds of oats, estimated ma.
- Page 28 and 29: Estimated m et value of 15,000 metr
- Page 30 and 31: gatherings were prohibited until mi
- Page 32 and 33: MOROCCO CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DISA
- Page 34 and 35: established for the fire victims by
- Page 36 and 37: P. L. 480, Title 11, sorghum, value
- Page 38 and 39: Large amounts of publicity and pmpa
- Page 40 and 41: As this reporting period closes, th
- Page 42 and 43: oth sides. This was acknowledged by
- Page 44 and 45: The Resident Comnissioners were res
- Page 46 and 47: Ambassador Ferguson in Biafra June
- Page 48 and 49: The work of the kwashiorkor sickbay
- Page 50 and 51: Since the beginning of the program
- Page 52 and 53: Even though the end of the conflict
- Page 54 and 55: donated by them wNch in most instan
- Page 56 and 57: Ambassador Ferguson and his staff p
- Page 58 and 59: Soon there were ever increasing num
- Page 60 and 61: themselves to relief cargoes, but t
- Page 62 and 63: Stockpile at Santa Isabel received
GHANA<br />
CHARA-TICS<br />
EYEN'I':<br />
Floods<br />
OF THE DISASTER<br />
DATGTlME : July-October , 1968<br />
LOCATION:<br />
Volta, Western Central, Brong-Ahafo, Ashanti and Eastern<br />
Regions<br />
DISASTER No. Killed Number Evacuated<br />
VICTIMS: None 25,000<br />
ESTIMATED PROPERTY DAMAGE:<br />
Dollar Damage<br />
4,000 homes destroyed $ 1,400,000<br />
Flood damage to roads and bridges 7,000,000<br />
Foreign exchange loss due to severe<br />
damage to cocoa crop<br />
Other crop losses - maize, rice,<br />
50,000,000 *<br />
guinea corn, millet, cassava,<br />
plantain 16,300 000 *<br />
vqmm<br />
* Represents value of loss f'rom comparison with<br />
1967 output and prices. The econamic effect in<br />
the form of inflation and a higher cost of living<br />
was considerable. Also, Ghana<br />
was forced to utilize foreign<br />
exchange in 1969 to import food.<br />
DESCFUrnON OF THE DISASTER:<br />
The Ghana flood emergency was called a "creeping<br />
disaster." This was because the rains fell<br />
in unusual amounts for the entire rainy season.<br />
The slow rising floods occurred from July to<br />
October 1968, first jn one region and then in<br />
another. Roads and crops were washed out in<br />
one area; homes were destroyed in others. The<br />
disaster-was never a compact problem where it<br />
was easy to identify the persons affected, the<br />
assistance they required or the extent of the