26.12.2013 Views

Excavations at Wallingford, 1974 - Oxoniensia

Excavations at Wallingford, 1974 - Oxoniensia

Excavations at Wallingford, 1974 - Oxoniensia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206 T. J. WEARE<br />

(3 x 4'5 m. irutially, l<strong>at</strong>er extended) on the south side of the site. A system of metric<br />

coordin<strong>at</strong>ion was used to record positions in plan. Levels recorded in both trenches<br />

were referred to the same d<strong>at</strong>um, a fixed point outside the site. This d<strong>at</strong>um was<br />

reduced to Ordnance D<strong>at</strong>um through a permanent bench mark.<br />

To maintain as much control as possible each trench was divided into quadrants<br />

and excav<strong>at</strong>ion altern<strong>at</strong>ed between diagonal pairs of quadrants until a fe<strong>at</strong>ure or<br />

layer was identified.<br />

NEW ROAD<br />

18/111<br />

SCALE<br />

i.Fili I I<br />

0 2 1 ~ 5 6 7 8 9 10 Metres<br />

Tronch I<br />

....<br />

'"<br />

Q:<br />

....<br />

V}<br />

21/105<br />

Trench 1<br />

I--<br />

N<br />

\<br />

l-<br />

r<br />

V}<br />

'" l:<br />

...<br />

:to<br />

....<br />

20/100<br />

I--<br />

b~se line<br />

'0(100<br />

FtG. !2<br />

Plan of site showing position of trenches, base line, etc.<br />

Period 1.' Pre-burial phase (?twelfth/thirteenth century A.D.)<br />

Trench I. Two pits were found, each approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 1'5 m. diameter, I m. deep<br />

(one = 26 on FIG. 3).<br />

Trench II. A chalk, mortar and flint layer (230 in FIG. 4) in the south-west corner<br />

was cut by an articul<strong>at</strong>ed inhum<strong>at</strong>ion and by the Period 2 bell-pit described below.<br />

Little can be said about the trench I pits, as they were in the north·east and south-west<br />

corners of the trench and could only be partly excav<strong>at</strong>ed. It is unlikely th<strong>at</strong> they were<br />

rubbish pits because they contained very little debris, and they may have been dug to<br />

extract gravel. They pre-d<strong>at</strong>ed use of the site for burials as there were inhum<strong>at</strong>ions above<br />

them.<br />

The layer of chalk etc. in trench II is thought to have been a spread of building<br />

debris although no evidence of footings or of a robber trench was found.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!