26.12.2013 Views

ARAb StAtES diSMAyEd At WESt'S cOMPlAcENcy - Kuwait Times

ARAb StAtES diSMAyEd At WESt'S cOMPlAcENcy - Kuwait Times

ARAb StAtES diSMAyEd At WESt'S cOMPlAcENcy - Kuwait Times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SATURDAY, MAY 4, 2013<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Clean technology investors shift focus to drilling<br />

NEW YORK: A decade ago, large investors in so-called<br />

clean technology had a straightforward goal: finance<br />

companies that would help eliminate the world’s<br />

dependence on oil, natural gas and coal. But as profits<br />

from wind, solar, biofuels and other alternatives consistently<br />

fell short of expectations - and as the fossil fuel<br />

business boomed - things got complicated. Venture<br />

capitalists and other investment funds started stretching<br />

the definition of clean technology almost beyond recognition<br />

in an effort to make money while clinging to their<br />

environmental ideals.<br />

Today, clean technology investment funds are not<br />

trying to replace the fossil fuel industry, they’re trying to<br />

help it by financing companies that can make mining<br />

and drilling less dirty. The people running these funds<br />

acknowledge the apparent hypocrisy, but defend a<br />

more liberal definition of clean technology. “Oil and gas<br />

will be with us for a long time. If we can clean that up we<br />

will do the world a great service,” says Wal van Lierop,<br />

CEO of Chrysalix, a Vancouver, Canada-based venture<br />

capital firm founded in 2001.<br />

Chrysalix still backs companies that fit the more traditional<br />

definition of clean energy - including Bridgelux,<br />

which makes more efficient light bulbs, and Agilyx,<br />

which turns plastic waste into fuel. But the firm, whose<br />

website boasts that it is “100 percent focused on clean<br />

energy” is a backer of MineSense, which helps miners<br />

operate more efficiently by assessing the quality of ore<br />

as it is being scooped. It also supports GlassPoint, which<br />

helps drillers extract more oil by using steam generated<br />

with solar power.<br />

Environmentalists have mixed feelings. They welcome<br />

technologies that reduce the environmental footprint<br />

of oil and gas development. But they worry the<br />

newfound abundance of oil and natural gas - and all the<br />

money that can be made helping drillers - has distracted<br />

clean technology backers from what once seemed to be<br />

their main goal: to make oil and gas a thing of the past.<br />

Mark Brownstein, who runs the energy and climate program<br />

at the Environmental Defense Fund, says “some<br />

don’t have the stomach for that and are simply going<br />

with the flow.”<br />

The shift has made even those who are helping to<br />

drive it squirm. “We’ve wrestled with it,” says Alan<br />

Salzman, managing partner of VantagePoint Capital<br />

Partners, one of Silicon Valley’s most prominent venture<br />

firms focused on clean technology. “If someone comes<br />

up with a more benign way of (exploiting fossil fuels), is<br />

that a good thing or a bad thing?” If fossil fuels become<br />

more palatable to society, Salzman says, we may end up<br />

burning more of them.<br />

Ten years ago it seemed as if the world was running<br />

out of oil, and what was left of it was in the Middle East.<br />

Oil and natural gas prices spiked to alarming highs. And<br />

scientists showed that fossil fuels were causing troubling<br />

changes to the climate. Pushing for an end of the<br />

fossil age made sense for economic, political and environmental<br />

reasons. This had Silicon Valley venture capitalists<br />

drooling. “Cleantech” as they called it, would be<br />

the next big thing. And it was going to be very, very big.<br />

These firms saw a chance to profit from what many<br />

thought would be the biggest economic shift in history -<br />

from fossil energy to renewable energy.<br />

But the new energy technologies proved much harder<br />

to master than predicted. And oil and gas drillers,<br />

using technology advances of their own, learned how to<br />

unlock enormous new reserves of fossil fuels. Dozens of<br />

solar, biofuels and battery companies failed, unable to<br />

show enough promise to go public or attract the attention<br />

of bigger companies. “Investors are still waiting for<br />

their cleantech investments to produce returns,” says<br />

Dallas Kachan, who runs the San Francisco clean technology<br />

consulting firm Kachan & Co. “Nobody’s seen the<br />

stellar home runs they were hoping for 5 years ago.”<br />

Even when clean energy companies have gone public,<br />

they haven’t fared well. An index of clean energy<br />

companies is down 69 percent since it began in 2005. A<br />

similar index of traditional energy companies is up 75<br />

percent over the same period. The value of global clean<br />

technology deals fell 29 percent last year to $7 billion,<br />

from a record $9.9 billion in 2011, according to the<br />

Cleantech Group. But the portion of that sum focused<br />

on conventional fossil fuels nearly tripled, to a record<br />

$556 million.<br />

A few clean technology investors have stayed away<br />

from oil and gas despite the temptation. Khosla<br />

Ventures, for example, has been a major backer of<br />

advanced biofuels even as most of these companies<br />

have failed to live up to their promise. The firm does not<br />

invest in companies that support fossil fuels. But the<br />

drilling boom has led to countless investments in this<br />

gray area between clean and dirty. Axine, which is<br />

backed by Chrysalix and Royal Dutch Shell, wants to<br />

make the drilling process known as fracking less dangerous<br />

by treating wastewater produced during drilling<br />

without chemicals.—AP<br />

Mobile ads<br />

lift Facebook<br />

NEW YORK: A year ago, Facebook was just testing the<br />

waters of mobile advertising, causing plenty of headaches<br />

for investors ahead of its massive initial public offering. It<br />

has since eased those worries. On Wednesday the world’s<br />

biggest social networking company said nearly a third of its<br />

advertising revenue came from mobile in the first three<br />

months of the year, helping to push total revenue up 38<br />

percent to surpass Wall Street’s expectations.<br />

“They are making the transition to mobile faster than<br />

anyone anticipated,” said Sterne Agee analyst Arvind Bhatia.<br />

“It seems like they are delivering.” Facebook Inc said<br />

Wednesday that its net income was $219 million, or 9 cents<br />

per share, in the January-March period. That’s up from $205<br />

million, or 9 cents per share, in the same period a year ago,<br />

when it was still private. Revenue grew to $1.46 billion from<br />

$1.06 billion, above analysts’ expectations of $1.44 billion.<br />

Excluding special items, mainly related to stock compensation<br />

expenses, Facebook earned 12 cents per share,<br />

matching the average of analyst expectations, according to<br />

FactSet. Menlo Park, Calif.-based Facebook said that its<br />

mobile advertising revenue was 30 percent of its total ad<br />

revenue in the first quarter, amounting to $375 million.<br />

That’s up from 23 percent, or $306 million, in the fourth<br />

quarter. In the third quarter - the first time it disclosed such<br />

figures - the company generated 14 percent, or $153 million,<br />

of its advertising revenue from mobile.<br />

Investors had been worried about Facebook’s ability to<br />

grow mobile revenue since before its initial public offering<br />

in May 2012. That’s because although the number of people<br />

who access Facebook on smartphones and tablet computers<br />

has been growing quickly, Facebook didn’t begin showing<br />

ads to those users until last year. David Ebersman,<br />

Facebook’s chief financial officer, said most advertisers did<br />

not specify that their ads be shown only on desktop computers<br />

or only on mobile devices, “rather they put their ads<br />

into our system and allow us to show the ads on whatever<br />

device where the ads will perform best.”<br />

Bhatia thinks Facebook will fare even better on mobile<br />

devices once Zuckerberg firms up its plan to make money<br />

from the growing audience checking into Instagram, a photo-sharing<br />

service that the company bought last year for<br />

$521 million. The analyst believes Instagram will play a bigger<br />

role in Facebook’s business next year.—AP<br />

WCup host Brazil promises<br />

fast Internet connections<br />

Fans may use 3G wireless network<br />

BRASILIA: Soccer fans attending next year’s World Cup in Brazil<br />

will have no problem going online from stadiums, but they<br />

might want to use a local cellphone chip to keep their charges<br />

low, Brazilian Communications Minister Paulo Bernardo said on<br />

Thursday. Each of the 12 stadiums hosting the 32-nation soccer<br />

tournament will have two separate 50-gigabyte networks connected<br />

to Brazil’s fiber optic backbone, he told reporters.<br />

“I doubt that the stadiums will use one third of the capacity<br />

that we are installing,” Bernardo said. “Not even Mr Jerome<br />

Valcke will use up all that capacity, though he could if he makes<br />

a lot of explosive statements,” the minister said in reference to<br />

the general secretary of FIFA, the governing body of global soccer.<br />

Valcke was briefly declared persona non grata by the<br />

Brazilian government last year for saying Brazil needed a “kick<br />

up the backside” to speed up preparations for the World Cup.<br />

Though relations between Brazil and Valcke have improved<br />

since, FIFA remains concerned about construction delays for the<br />

stadiums that will host the games. It has also expressed worries<br />

about the readiness of hotel, transport and communications<br />

facilities. Brazil has yet to officially open two of the six stadiums<br />

that will be used for the Confederations Cup, a dress rehearsal<br />

for the 2014 tournament. The smaller contest kicks off on June<br />

15 with Japan facing the host country in the capital, Brasilia.<br />

More than half a million soccer fans are expected to travel to<br />

Brazil next year for the World Cup. Many will be emailing and<br />

posting photos on social networks during the games, congesting<br />

local wireless networks. Brazil officially launched the latest<br />

fourth generation (4G) wireless technology this week, and the<br />

service will be available at the stadiums and in the host cities for<br />

the Confederations Cup. But the majority of foreign fans will not<br />

be able to use it. That is because most smartphones in the<br />

United States and Europe use the 700 MHz frequency, while<br />

Brazil’s 4G network uses 2.5 GHz. “Whoever has a 700 MHz cellphone<br />

will not be able to use 4G, they will have to use 3G,”<br />

Bernardo said.<br />

The minister recommended that fans leave their cellphones<br />

at home to avoid paying “scorching” international roaming fees,<br />

and instead get a local chip on arrival in Brazil. Brazil’s wireless<br />

infrastructure is among FIFA’s top concerns ahead of the World<br />

Cup. FIFA spokesman Walter de Gregorio said last month Brazil<br />

BRASILIA: Brazilian Minister of Communications, Paulo<br />

Bernardo offers an interview to the Foreign Correspondents<br />

Association at the Ministry in Brasilia. Bernardo talked about<br />

the advances of the telecommunications in the country and<br />

the preparations ahead of FIFA’s Confederations Cup in 2013<br />

and World Cup in 2014. — AFP<br />

should maybe fix its 3G network before jumping to 4G. The<br />

number of 3G users in Brazil has grown “explosively” to 70 million<br />

since the technology was introduced in 2008, and is expected<br />

to grow to 130 million by the end of 2014, Bernardo said.<br />

Brazilians complain the service provided by local cellphone<br />

companies is poor, with connections dropping regularly and<br />

signals congesting at crowded events such as music festivals.<br />

Paying for access to Wi-Fi may be the best means of communications<br />

at the World Cup for those wanting to capture the<br />

excitement of the games and post it on social networks.<br />

Ample high-speed Wi-Fi access will be good news for the<br />

heaviest users of broadband at any major sporting event: the<br />

media, who rely on the Internet to send out pictures and video<br />

images. — Reuters

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!