26.12.2013 Views

il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...

il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...

il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lc. Retinoic acid receptors<br />

Three weeks after <strong>the</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment, protein levels <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual RAR and<br />

RXR receptors (a, p, 1) were examined in <strong>the</strong> hearts <strong>of</strong> ADR" ADR+PROB, PROB and<br />

CONT groups (Fig. 8). The administr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> adriamycin in ADR group animals caused<br />

84o/o increase in <strong>the</strong> RAR c¿ receptor protein levels, while <strong>the</strong> same group exhibited 14%<br />

decrease in RAR y and a 510á decrease in RXR þ (51%) when compared to CONT group<br />

(Fig. S). The expression <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r retinoic acid receptors in <strong>the</strong> ADR group was not found<br />

to be significantly different from <strong>the</strong> CONT group (Fig. 8). ADR group hearts also<br />

exhibited some increase in <strong>the</strong> total RAR receptors. The total RXR levels did not differ<br />

from control (Fig. 9). The RAR/RXR r<strong>at</strong>io in <strong>the</strong> ADR group was increased by 60%<br />

when compared to control (Fig. 10).<br />

The tre<strong>at</strong>ment with probucol in <strong>the</strong> PROB group hearts resulted in an increased<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual RAR and RXR receptors when compared to CONT<br />

group (RAR a: 104Yo, RAR B: 44%,RAR y: 45Yo, RXR cr: 58%, RXR g'. 50% and RXR<br />

y. 53%) (Fig.8). The PROB group exhibited a significant increase in <strong>the</strong> combined RAR<br />

and RXR receptor levels when compared to CONT (64% and 54Yo) (Fig.9), but no<br />

significant increase in <strong>the</strong> RAR/RXR r<strong>at</strong>io (Fig.10).<br />

Tre<strong>at</strong>ment with antioxidant probucol in <strong>the</strong> ADR+PROB group caused a<br />

significant increase in all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual RAR and RXR receptors when compared to<br />

control (RAR u.:30Yo, RAR B: 46%, RAR y:45o/o, RXR c¿: 29yo,RÆ.þ: 48% and RAR<br />

y. l4%) (Fig.8). ADR+PROB group showed a significant increase in <strong>the</strong> RAR P, RAR y,<br />

RXR c¿ and RXR B expression when compared to ADR group (37yo,38Yo, I3Yo and<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!