in partial fulfil]ment of the - MSpace - University of Manitoba
in partial fulfil]ment of the - MSpace - University of Manitoba
in partial fulfil]ment of the - MSpace - University of Manitoba
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 "2 EXPERIMENT iI: APPLICATION OF THE<br />
ADULT SUBJECTS.<br />
MUTTIPLE DECISION PROCEDURE<br />
93<br />
iN<br />
Experi<strong>ment</strong> II was designed to determ<strong>in</strong>e: 1. whe<strong>the</strong>r or not t,here was<br />
a fluctuation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purk<strong>in</strong>je shift; 2. whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
response <strong>of</strong> subjects to <strong>the</strong> purk<strong>in</strong>je shift <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rapid Dark Adaptation<br />
Test (Thornton, 1977 ) had a cyclical nature.<br />
Subjects for this experi<strong>ment</strong> were <strong>the</strong> same adult subjects <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
<strong>in</strong><br />
experi<strong>ment</strong> I. The test used was <strong>the</strong> MuItiple Decision Procedure and<br />
<strong>the</strong><br />
test<strong>in</strong>g procedure is described under Methods.<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> experi<strong>ment</strong> II are given <strong>in</strong> Table 23 and 24. À11 subjects,<br />
except one (subject 2), successfully completed <strong>the</strong> test over <strong>the</strong> entire<br />
test<strong>in</strong>g days. Subject 2 tailed to complete <strong>the</strong> test <strong>in</strong> less than 10<br />
m<strong>in</strong>utes dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first two days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test. Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test times<br />
recorded for subject 2 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last three days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test were<br />
higher than that recorded for any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r subjects on any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
five test<strong>in</strong>g days. The mean test times for subject 2, <strong>in</strong> Thornton's<br />
Rapid Dark Adaptation Test (nxperi<strong>ment</strong> I), was also observed to be<br />
higher than that recorded for any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 4 subjects. The mean<br />
times for Trials II and III for 4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 5 subjecLs for completion <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Multiple Decision Procedure on days I,II,III,IV,and V were 300,<br />
208.6, '188.6' 189,and 173.5 secondsrrespectively. The mean test time<br />
for <strong>the</strong> four subjecLs over <strong>the</strong> five days was 207.9 seconds. A mean time<br />
<strong>of</strong>. 173.2 seconds rvas reported for 5 subjecLs for 4 tests (Sevenhuysen,<br />
1984). Sources <strong>of</strong> variability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Multiple Decision procedure are<br />
given <strong>in</strong> Table 24. Significant subject-effect (p