Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
47<br />
moderately heritable while carcass length, total fat thickness, lo<strong>in</strong><br />
eye area, grade <strong>in</strong>dex, ham surface area, percent predicted yield <strong>and</strong><br />
adjusted age to market weight were highly heritable.<br />
III.<br />
Phenotypic correlations<br />
Phenotypic correlatíons among the eleven traiLs are<br />
summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 19.<br />
Carcass length \,Jas negatively correlated wíth shoulder fal thickness'<br />
mid-back fât thickness, lo<strong>in</strong> fat thickness, lo<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> ham surface<br />
area' <strong>and</strong> age to market weight, but was positively correlated with carcass<br />
grade. The correlations betr¿een carcass length <strong>and</strong> percent ham<br />
weight <strong>and</strong> predicted yield were negligible.<br />
These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
that longer pigs should have l-ower back fat, smaller lo<strong>in</strong> eye <strong>and</strong> ham<br />
surface, faster growth rate <strong>and</strong> higher carcass grade <strong>in</strong>dex. This<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong> good agreement wíth most reports from previous research.<br />
The relationships among the back fat thickness measurenents were al-l<br />
positive <strong>and</strong> the values ranged from 0.32 to 0.53. similar results<br />
have also been reporred by Smirh et al. (Lg6Z).<br />
Lo<strong>in</strong> eye area !/as negatively correlated with all three back fat<br />
thickness measurements, but was positively correlated wÍth grade, percent<br />
ham weight <strong>and</strong> ham surface area <strong>and</strong> highly positively related to<br />
percent predicted yield.<br />
The association between lo<strong>in</strong> eye area <strong>and</strong><br />
age to market weight was positive but low <strong>in</strong> magnitude. The <strong>phenotypic</strong><br />
correlation coeffÍcients between lo<strong>in</strong> eye area <strong>and</strong> back fat<br />
thickness, percent predicted yield <strong>and</strong> age to market weight reported.<br />
from the present study were fairly<br />
similar to the reports from Smith<br />
et al. (1962), smith <strong>and</strong> Ross (1965), Jensen er ar. (1967), Arganosa