26.12.2013 Views

Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...

Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...

Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

47<br />

moderately heritable while carcass length, total fat thickness, lo<strong>in</strong><br />

eye area, grade <strong>in</strong>dex, ham surface area, percent predicted yield <strong>and</strong><br />

adjusted age to market weight were highly heritable.<br />

III.<br />

Phenotypic correlations<br />

Phenotypic correlatíons among the eleven traiLs are<br />

summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 19.<br />

Carcass length \,Jas negatively correlated wíth shoulder fal thickness'<br />

mid-back fât thickness, lo<strong>in</strong> fat thickness, lo<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> ham surface<br />

area' <strong>and</strong> age to market weight, but was positively correlated with carcass<br />

grade. The correlations betr¿een carcass length <strong>and</strong> percent ham<br />

weight <strong>and</strong> predicted yield were negligible.<br />

These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

that longer pigs should have l-ower back fat, smaller lo<strong>in</strong> eye <strong>and</strong> ham<br />

surface, faster growth rate <strong>and</strong> higher carcass grade <strong>in</strong>dex. This<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong> good agreement wíth most reports from previous research.<br />

The relationships among the back fat thickness measurenents were al-l<br />

positive <strong>and</strong> the values ranged from 0.32 to 0.53. similar results<br />

have also been reporred by Smirh et al. (Lg6Z).<br />

Lo<strong>in</strong> eye area !/as negatively correlated with all three back fat<br />

thickness measurements, but was positively correlated wÍth grade, percent<br />

ham weight <strong>and</strong> ham surface area <strong>and</strong> highly positively related to<br />

percent predicted yield.<br />

The association between lo<strong>in</strong> eye area <strong>and</strong><br />

age to market weight was positive but low <strong>in</strong> magnitude. The <strong>phenotypic</strong><br />

correlation coeffÍcients between lo<strong>in</strong> eye area <strong>and</strong> back fat<br />

thickness, percent predicted yield <strong>and</strong> age to market weight reported.<br />

from the present study were fairly<br />

similar to the reports from Smith<br />

et al. (1962), smith <strong>and</strong> Ross (1965), Jensen er ar. (1967), Arganosa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!