Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
45<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the heritabilities<br />
derived from the dam components Ìùere<br />
higher than those from the sire components. The hígher heritabílity<br />
estimaËes from dem components are possibly due to maternal effects.<br />
The heritability estim¡¡s for carcass length was hÍgh at 0.62<br />
2<br />
(hi*o) <strong>and</strong> fel1 with<strong>in</strong><br />
The herÍtabÍlities<br />
the range reported from other researchers.<br />
for three <strong>in</strong>dividual fat thickness measuremenËs<br />
<strong>and</strong> total back fat thickness were íntermediate <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> good agreement<br />
with values reported by Flock (1970), siers et al. (L912) <strong>and</strong><br />
Roy et a1. (1968) but were considerably lower than the reports from<br />
SnÍth et al. (L962), Jensen er al. (L967), Anganosa er al. (f969),<br />
Enfield <strong>and</strong> Whatley (1961) <strong>and</strong> Fahmy er at. (f970).<br />
The heritability<br />
<strong>of</strong> io<strong>in</strong> eye \"ras .53 <strong>and</strong> was ín close agreement<br />
r¿ith the estimates reported by Flock (1970), Jensen et al. (L967),<br />
Arganosa et al. (1969), smith <strong>and</strong> Ross (1965), Enfield <strong>and</strong> LÏhatley<br />
(1961), Fahmy et al. (1970) <strong>and</strong> Roy er al. (1968) bur was higher rhan<br />
the estimete <strong>of</strong> 0.35 by srníth et al. (1962) <strong>and</strong> r^ras lower than the<br />
estimate reported by Siers eË al. (L972).<br />
The percent ham weight <strong>of</strong> c.arcass side weight rnras moderately<br />
heritable <strong>and</strong> the value estim¡lsd from the presenË study was <strong>in</strong> agreement<br />
wíth other reports.<br />
The herj-tability<br />
<strong>of</strong> ham surface area, percent predicted yield <strong>and</strong><br />
age to market weight were 0.41, 0.56 <strong>and</strong> 0.59, respectively.<br />
The<br />
estimatiorsfor these Ëraits were slightly higher than the values reported<br />
<strong>in</strong> the literature.<br />
In conclusion, Ëhe traits <strong>of</strong> carcass shoulder fat Èhickness, midback<br />
fat thickness, lo<strong>in</strong> fat thickness <strong>and</strong> the percenË ham weight were