Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters in a closed ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7<br />
r^/ith the number <strong>of</strong> pigs born alive <strong>and</strong> the litter weíght at birth. The<br />
<strong>genetic</strong> correlation betr¿een number <strong>of</strong> pigs born alive <strong>and</strong> 1ítter weight<br />
at birth was also hígh1y positive.<br />
Young eË al. (1978) anaryzeð. data from 2,095 girts <strong>and</strong> reporred<br />
<strong>phenotypic</strong> correlations between litter size <strong>and</strong> total litter weight at<br />
birth <strong>and</strong> at 42 days to be high <strong>and</strong> positive.<br />
In <strong>genetic</strong> correlations,<br />
pig birth weight was positively correlated with total number born (O .37),<br />
number born alive (0.35) <strong>and</strong> nuuber rueaned (0,04).<br />
The <strong>genetic</strong> correlations<br />
between pig wean<strong>in</strong>g weight <strong>and</strong> lítter<br />
size at birth (total<br />
number born <strong>and</strong> number born alive) were negligible, while a moderately<br />
negative correlation Ítas found between pig wean<strong>in</strong>g weight <strong>and</strong> number<br />
weaned.<br />
B. Carcass measurernents <strong>and</strong> age to ma¡]¡s¡ weight<br />
I. HerÍtabílity estimates<br />
The suntmary <strong>of</strong> heritability<br />
estímates <strong>of</strong> carcass measurements <strong>and</strong>.<br />
age to markeË weight reported frorn different researchers is presented <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 2. rt is clear that the majority <strong>of</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>e carcass traits are<br />
moderately or highly heritable. HerítabilÍty <strong>of</strong> carcass length reported<br />
<strong>in</strong> the lÍterature ranged froro 0.46 to 0.87 <strong>and</strong> averaged 0.63. Backfat<br />
thickness <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>divídual shoulder, rnÍd-back <strong>and</strong> lo<strong>in</strong> fat thickness<br />
measurement, <strong>and</strong> the mean frorn ,two or three fat thickness measurements,<br />
ranged from a 1ow <strong>of</strong> 0.25 to a high <strong>of</strong> 0.74 <strong>and</strong> averaged 0.50. Lo<strong>in</strong> eye<br />
area ranged from 0.35 to 0.70 <strong>and</strong> averaged at 0.50. Dress<strong>in</strong>g percentage<br />
was moderately heritable <strong>and</strong> ranged from 0.26 to 0.40 with an average <strong>of</strong><br />
0.32. HeritabÍlity <strong>of</strong> age to market weight (approx. 90 kg) \^¡as reported