26.12.2013 Views

SUMMERS, KAREN CRADY, Ph.D. Reading Incest - The University ...

SUMMERS, KAREN CRADY, Ph.D. Reading Incest - The University ...

SUMMERS, KAREN CRADY, Ph.D. Reading Incest - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18<br />

Richard” (111). <strong>The</strong> dedication of the first version reads, in part, that this is “a bok for<br />

king Richardes sake” 3 , which is changed to “a bok for Engelondes sake / <strong>The</strong> yer<br />

sextenthe of kyng Richard [22 June 1392 to 21 June 1393]” (24-25). Nicholson finds the<br />

inclusion of the exact date significant because it might mean that the rewriting of the<br />

dedication was not because of any political dissatisfaction with Richard, as there would<br />

not have been time for any to develop. On the other hand, the date may simply have been<br />

added years later to “predate” the poem in order to make the dedication to Henry<br />

stronger. If so, this could indicate that “the rewriting might very well have been tied up<br />

with the political events at the end of the decade” (111). Despite this difference in the<br />

versions of the prologue, the individual books and especially the tales themselves are<br />

essentially the same, as is the narrative frame of the seven deadly sins which Gower uses<br />

to build his case.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is in Confessio Amantis the element of instruction manual for kings; tale<br />

upon tale relates the destructive nature of poor kingship. However, the poet must<br />

prudently fictionalize his tales lest by speaking too directly, he insult the king. Relating<br />

stories of kings in antiquity is a way to camouflage direct criticism of one’s own king<br />

while still imparting wisdom. Ferster has demonstrated that like Gower, Chaucer crafted<br />

his narratives carefully to offer such advice while avoiding offense. In the Tale of<br />

Melibee, Chaucer removed a quote because “he knew the tale could have political<br />

reverberations and wanted to control them: He left out the proverb in his French source<br />

3 <strong>The</strong> first dedication in the Prologue was written by 1390; the revision was written c. 1392, which was the<br />

sixteenth century of Richard’s reign; Henry did not succeed to the throne until 1399. See Macaulay, Works<br />

of John Gower, (Oxford, 1901) for details on the revision. But having earlier composed Mirour de l’Omme<br />

and Vox Clamantis, by 1385 Gower was already a well-known poet. Furthermore, Chaucer’s dedication of<br />

Troilus and Cressida (c. 1385) must have added to Gower’s fame.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!