ÇUKUROVA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED ...
ÇUKUROVA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED ... ÇUKUROVA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED ...
4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa İNCİ according to (4.47) and (4.48). The coefficient γ in (4.47) is 1 when V presag cosϑ > V cosϑ ; otherwise, it is “-1”(Ajaei et al.,2011) presag S S V inj 2 ( V cosϑ −V cosϑ ) − ( V sinϑ −V sinϑ ) ) 2 = γ × (4.49) presag presag S S presag presag S S ϑ inj ⎛ ⎞ − Vpresag sinϑpresag −VS sinϑS = tan 1 ⎜ ⎟ (4.50) ⎝Vpresag cosϑpresag −VS cosϑS ⎠ Figure 4.18. Phasor subtraction 73
- Page 42 and 43: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 44 and 45: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 46: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 49 and 50: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 51 and 52: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 53 and 54: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 55 and 56: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 58: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 61 and 62: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 63: 3. FUNDAMENTALS OF DVR Mustafa İNC
- Page 66 and 67: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 68 and 69: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 70 and 71: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 72 and 73: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 74 and 75: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 76 and 77: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 78 and 79: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 81 and 82: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 83 and 84: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 85 and 86: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 88 and 89: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 90 and 91: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 94 and 95: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 96 and 97: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 98: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 101 and 102: 4. MODELING OF PROPOSED DVR Mustafa
- Page 103 and 104: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 105 and 106: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 107 and 108: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 109 and 110: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 111 and 112: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 113 and 114: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 115 and 116: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 117 and 118: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 119 and 120: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 121 and 122: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 123 and 124: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 125 and 126: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 127 and 128: 5. SIMULATION RESULTS AND CASE STUD
- Page 129 and 130: 6. CONCLUSION Mustafa İNCİ The in
- Page 131 and 132: REFERENCES ACAR, Ç., 2002. The Ana
- Page 133 and 134: IEEE Standard 519-1992, Recommended
- Page 135 and 136: LI, B.H., CHOI, S.S., and VILATHGAM
- Page 137 and 138: RAMASAMY, M., THANGAVEL, S., 2011.
- Page 139 and 140: WU, Z., ZOU, Y., DING, K., 2005. An
- Page 141 and 142: 122
4. MODELING <strong>OF</strong> PROPOSED DVR Mustafa İNCİ<br />
according to (4.47) and (4.48). The coefficient γ in (4.47) is 1 when<br />
V<br />
presag<br />
cosϑ > V cosϑ<br />
; otherwise, it is “-1”(Ajaei et al.,2011)<br />
presag<br />
S<br />
S<br />
V<br />
inj<br />
2<br />
( V cosϑ<br />
−V<br />
cosϑ<br />
) − ( V sinϑ<br />
−V<br />
sinϑ<br />
) )<br />
2<br />
= γ ×<br />
(4.49)<br />
presag<br />
presag<br />
S<br />
S<br />
presag<br />
presag<br />
S<br />
S<br />
ϑ<br />
inj<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
−<br />
Vpresag<br />
sinϑpresag<br />
−VS<br />
sinϑS<br />
= tan 1 ⎜<br />
⎟<br />
(4.50)<br />
⎝Vpresag<br />
cosϑpresag<br />
−VS<br />
cosϑS<br />
⎠<br />
Figure 4.18. Phasor subtraction<br />
73
Change language