26.12.2013 Views

ÇUKUROVA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED ...

ÇUKUROVA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED ...

ÇUKUROVA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. SIMULATION RESULTS <strong>AND</strong> CASE STUDIES Mustafa İNCİ<br />

Table 5.7. Sag inception and finish time for three methods<br />

Voltage Sag (Phase A) Inception Finish Result<br />

EPLL 0.3028 s 0.4046 s Medium<br />

SRF 0.3012 s 0.4019 s Fast<br />

SogiPLL 0.3039 s 0.4055 s Slow<br />

It is shown Table 5.7, SRF is the best way to detect voltage sag and swell<br />

compared to EPLL and SOGIPLL. Although EPLL and SogiPLL extract the phase<br />

information compared to SRF, SRF is more superior than EPLL and SOGIPLL due<br />

to its speed and accuracy. However, It is clear that EPLL and SOGIPLL have more<br />

oscillatory than SRF as shown in Figure 5.2 (c).<br />

Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 show injected voltages and load-side voltages by<br />

using three sag detection methods.<br />

Figure 5.3. Injected voltages by using three sag detection methods<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!