26.12.2013 Views

How business, doctors and journalists prey on your food anxieties I

How business, doctors and journalists prey on your food anxieties I

How business, doctors and journalists prey on your food anxieties I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hcalth scare<br />

I<br />

Expect more such n<strong>on</strong>sense,<br />

because of the inherent<br />

limitari<strong>on</strong>s in the<br />

cpidemiologv of n<strong>on</strong>infectious<br />

disease . Scientists<br />

could desise an expcriment<br />

that would realk<br />

proNe whethcr loodoses<br />

of sec<strong>on</strong>dh<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> smoke<br />

hurt children, but the experimentwould<br />

be unethical<br />

. To really I:now<br />

whether exercise makes<br />

people live l<strong>on</strong>ger, c .pcrimenters<br />

would have to<br />

r<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>omly select 1,000<br />

subjects <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> regiment<br />

their evero waking moment<br />

for decades .<br />

In default of such serious<br />

studies, distrust most<br />

sweeping c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

linking diet <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> health .<br />

Yes, cou can proN e statisticallv<br />

that people who esercise Gve l<strong>on</strong>ger . But the corv.dusi<strong>on</strong>-that<br />

exercise is good for you-mav put tJte cart<br />

before the horse . Think about it . Are people healdty<br />

because tluv esercisei Or do thev exercise because they arc<br />

healthv? The barc correlati<strong>on</strong> proves nothing . Pltysiological<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> other e\ ;dence leads mariv <str<strong>on</strong>g>doctors</str<strong>on</strong>g> to c<strong>on</strong>clude<br />

exercise helps . But even here, there's no clear proof<br />

The mass media punev health scare stories breath-<br />

!ess[v, treating each new paper in isolati<strong>on</strong> t}om the <strong>on</strong>es<br />

that came betixe . E%en if the researchers c<strong>on</strong>cede that<br />

there are limitati<strong>on</strong>s to the validity of the study, the media<br />

usuallv bury the caveat . "You reporters take at face value<br />

eVerything the scientists tell vou-something y'ou would<br />

ne~er think of doing if the<br />

source «-ere industrv<br />

or the government,"<br />

grouses <strong>on</strong>e prominent<br />

cpidemiologist .<br />

There's too much at<br />

stake for the health scare<br />

industry to admit to the<br />

shortcomings ofepidemiology<br />

. The Berkeley, Har-<br />

% ard, Johns Hopkins,<br />

Tutis <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> L'niversit • of<br />

Texas medical schools are<br />

raising m<strong>on</strong>ev by publishing<br />

health tip nct%,slettcrs<br />

for the general puhlic-<br />

The Journal of the American<br />

Medical Associati<strong>on</strong><br />

takes in S1, milli<strong>on</strong> in<br />

adsetZising a aenr . Jane<br />

Br ndv's Good Fod Book :<br />

Lirialt the HiAh Crtr6oht .-<br />

drnte SVav( 1985 ) is in its<br />

tenth printing . Sales of<br />

preparcd fr>ods ntaking<br />

health claims ("lo%c-tat,"<br />

"no sugar added," '9o r<br />

sodium") account ;or<br />

S23 billi<strong>on</strong> a vear .<br />

Let's go back to the<br />

butter/margarine argumcnt.<br />

In 1993 a group at<br />

Harvard linked trans-fatty<br />

acids to heart disease,<br />

adding, a year latcr, that<br />

the synthetic fats may be<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sible for an estra<br />

30,000 deaths a vear in<br />

the U .S . Margarine, of<br />

course, is fu':l of regetable<br />

oil hardened by a process<br />

called hydrogemati<strong>on</strong>tishich<br />

produces trans-fat-<br />

R, acids . The next year,<br />

murgarine sales dropped<br />

8 .2% by volumc, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> butter<br />

sales rose 1-4% .<br />

Take eggs. "You'd<br />

think there were half a dozen studies saring to avoid eggs ; "<br />

sa~s Walter C Willett of the Han, ard School oF Public<br />

Health . "Guess how manv there n°erc? When we started<br />

looking at this questi<strong>on</strong>, zero . Now there's still ven little<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> . No <strong>on</strong>e's cven slto~~n it in ut observati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

study [<strong>on</strong>e where eou compare people who say they cat<br />

eggs with people who sac they d<strong>on</strong>'t] . The recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

was based <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>ing that cholesterol in diet<br />

affects blood cholesterol, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> that eggs havc cholesterol ."<br />

Tell that to the chicken farmers . Thcr've watched dtolesterol-spooked<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumers cut their egg c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> from<br />

a pc-ik of 402 eggs per capita in 1945 to 238 todac .<br />

The old eggs-are-bad theory was built <strong>on</strong> a pretty sseak<br />

c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>, that cholesterol<br />

in <strong>food</strong>s affects<br />

blood cholesterol . But the<br />

fact is that gcnctic ntakeup<br />

is far more important<br />

than c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> ofcholesterol<br />

in determining<br />

blood cholesterol Ieels .<br />

Mavncltile, milli<strong>on</strong>s of<br />

children who could benetit<br />

from the cheap protein<br />

in eggs are being shooed<br />

awav tr<strong>on</strong>i it .<br />

Then there's the outrageous<br />

canipaign against<br />

"passivc" smoking . Some<br />

stndies 11,10 e purported to<br />

show that people exposed<br />

to other pcoplc's smokc<br />

arc more pr<strong>on</strong>e to lung<br />

caneer than the general<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> . The statistics<br />

are dubious . So-called<br />

passi~e smokers often<br />

1?2<br />

Porues . Au,ua 14 . 1995<br />

http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/agf97d00/pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!