26.12.2013 Views

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.1 Conservation of energy in coherent backscattering<br />

the photodiodes. For such samples, the angular distribution of the backscattered intensity is<br />

known to be proportional to the diffuson α d (θ) given in eqn. 2.14, as any deviations <strong>from</strong> the<br />

incoherent background (i.e. the backscattering cone and the energy cutback) are too narrow<br />

or too small to be detected by the setup.<br />

The backscattering of the reference is also proportional to the incoming laser power P and<br />

the total fraction of the backscattered intensity, the albedo A. The latter is reduced by energy<br />

losses in the sample, mostly due to absorption of photonic energy, but also because of photon<br />

leakage at the side and the rear surfaces.<br />

For the calibration of the photodiodes only a relative power scale is needed, as one is merely<br />

interested in compensating different gains of the diodes and their electronics. Therefore the<br />

exact value of the albedo is not important, as long as it is independent of the inserted light<br />

power. If however the albedos are known for sample and reference, one can derive an absolute<br />

power scale for the diode signals.<br />

Herein lies the misapprehension of [22, 23, 47], where the reference sample was also used to<br />

determine the intensity level of the diffuson. As the different albedos of sample and reference<br />

were neglected, this approach confuses relative and absolute power scale and therefore yields<br />

slightly wrong results.<br />

The photodiodes are calibrated by a series of measurements of the diode signals d θ at different<br />

incoming light powers P, so that a relation between the diode signals and the light power<br />

scattered in a certain direction θ can be derived. Previously used were relations like d θ ∝<br />

α d (θ) · P [19], d θ ∝ cos θ · P, or even simply d θ ∝ P [22, 23, 47]. The latter however distort both<br />

diffuson and cooperon for angles θ > 0, so that they can be used only if the backscattering<br />

cone is comparatively narrow.<br />

The effect of the different albedos of sample and reference can be incorporated in the calibration<br />

function by the albedo mismatch b ℵ = A reference /A sample :<br />

d θ ∝ α d (θ) · ℵ · P (5.2)<br />

The albedo mismatch rescales the emitted intensity of the reference, so that the backscattering<br />

of reference and sample is directly comparable.<br />

The precision of the experimental result is determined by the precision of the reference measurements.<br />

The order of the fitted polynomial must therefore be chosen such that the errors<br />

are not artificially reduced. Based on the observations on fig. 5.1 we use 3rd order polynomials<br />

to fit the data and obtain the calibration functions for the photodiodes.<br />

5.1.2 Calculating the albedo<br />

The albedo A of a multiple scattering sample is defined as the ratio of the (back-)scattered<br />

light power P out and the inserted power P in . The albedo of a sample without any losses would<br />

[b] ℵ = hebr. aleph<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!