26.12.2013 Views

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.6 On polarization and interference<br />

2.5.2 Transmission geometry<br />

While the samples for backscattering experiments are usually thick, transmission experiments<br />

require rather thin samples, which resemble an infinite slab of thickness L. Still, if the samples<br />

are not too thin, transmission experiments can be fully described by diffusion as all photon<br />

paths have at least the length of the sample thickness.<br />

As a consequence, the exact depth of the conversion between plane wave and diffusive transport<br />

plays only a subordinate role. One can therefore assume that the conversion happens at<br />

a single depth l ∗ .<br />

An important experimental quantity is the distribution of photon flight times (which is equivalent<br />

to the path length distribution) of the transmitted light<br />

∫<br />

j trans (t) ∝<br />

rear surface<br />

δ (z A − l ∗ ) · δ ( z B − (L ′ −l ∗ ) ) · ρ(A → B, t) 2 surfaces d⃗r ⊥ =<br />

= e− τ<br />

t ∞<br />

√<br />

4πDt<br />

∑ e − (2mL′ +(L ′ −l ∗ )−l ∗ ) 2<br />

4Dt − e − (2mL′ −(L ′ −l ∗ )−l ∗ ) 2<br />

4Dt<br />

m=−∞<br />

Using Poisson’s sum formula ∑ ∞ n=−∞ f (n) = ∑ ∞ m=−∞<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞ e−2πima f (a) da this can be turned<br />

into [38]<br />

j trans (t) ∝ 2e− τ<br />

t ∞ (<br />

L ∑ ′ e − n2 π 2<br />

L ′2 Dt nπ<br />

( nπ<br />

)<br />

sin<br />

L<br />

n=1<br />

′ l∗) sin<br />

L ′ (L′ − l ∗ )<br />

Obviously, it is l∗<br />

L<br />

′ 0, so that the sine can be replaced by its argument. Likewise, it is<br />

1. Here we can replace the sine by (−1)<br />

n+1 nπ<br />

l ∗ , yielding<br />

L ′ −l ∗<br />

L ′<br />

j trans (t) ∝ −2e − t τ<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

n=1<br />

( (−1) n e − n2 π 2<br />

L ′2 Dt nπ<br />

L ′<br />

) 2 l<br />

∗2<br />

L ′ L ′ (2.12)<br />

2.6 On polarization and interference<br />

With the introduction of the models ‘random walk’ and ‘diffusion’ an important property<br />

of the scattered light has been lost: Despite of the vectorial nature of electromagnetic waves<br />

both models describe the scattering of scalar waves. To find a correct description of multiple<br />

scattering of vector waves we have to go back to single scattering once more.<br />

Fig. 2.3 shows that the polarization of light scattered by a spherical particle depends strongly<br />

on the scattering angle and the polarization of the incoming wave with respect to the scattering<br />

plane. The result is that after a few scattering events in a multiple scattering sample the<br />

photons will have completely lost the memory of their initial polarization. Multiply scattered<br />

light is therefore unpolarized.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!