Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...
Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...
Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.6 On polarization and interference<br />
2.5.2 Transmission geometry<br />
While the samples for backscattering experiments are usually thick, transmission experiments<br />
require rather thin samples, which resemble an infinite slab of thickness L. Still, if the samples<br />
are not too thin, transmission experiments can be fully described by diffusion as all photon<br />
paths have at least the length of the sample thickness.<br />
As a consequence, the exact depth of the conversion between plane wave and diffusive transport<br />
plays only a subordinate role. One can therefore assume that the conversion happens at<br />
a single depth l ∗ .<br />
An important experimental quantity is the distribution of photon flight times (which is equivalent<br />
to the path length distribution) of the transmitted light<br />
∫<br />
j trans (t) ∝<br />
rear surface<br />
δ (z A − l ∗ ) · δ ( z B − (L ′ −l ∗ ) ) · ρ(A → B, t) 2 surfaces d⃗r ⊥ =<br />
= e− τ<br />
t ∞<br />
√<br />
4πDt<br />
∑ e − (2mL′ +(L ′ −l ∗ )−l ∗ ) 2<br />
4Dt − e − (2mL′ −(L ′ −l ∗ )−l ∗ ) 2<br />
4Dt<br />
m=−∞<br />
Using Poisson’s sum formula ∑ ∞ n=−∞ f (n) = ∑ ∞ m=−∞<br />
∫ ∞<br />
−∞ e−2πima f (a) da this can be turned<br />
into [38]<br />
j trans (t) ∝ 2e− τ<br />
t ∞ (<br />
L ∑ ′ e − n2 π 2<br />
L ′2 Dt nπ<br />
( nπ<br />
)<br />
sin<br />
L<br />
n=1<br />
′ l∗) sin<br />
L ′ (L′ − l ∗ )<br />
Obviously, it is l∗<br />
L<br />
′ 0, so that the sine can be replaced by its argument. Likewise, it is<br />
1. Here we can replace the sine by (−1)<br />
n+1 nπ<br />
l ∗ , yielding<br />
L ′ −l ∗<br />
L ′<br />
j trans (t) ∝ −2e − t τ<br />
∞<br />
∑<br />
n=1<br />
( (−1) n e − n2 π 2<br />
L ′2 Dt nπ<br />
L ′<br />
) 2 l<br />
∗2<br />
L ′ L ′ (2.12)<br />
2.6 On polarization and interference<br />
With the introduction of the models ‘random walk’ and ‘diffusion’ an important property<br />
of the scattered light has been lost: Despite of the vectorial nature of electromagnetic waves<br />
both models describe the scattering of scalar waves. To find a correct description of multiple<br />
scattering of vector waves we have to go back to single scattering once more.<br />
Fig. 2.3 shows that the polarization of light scattered by a spherical particle depends strongly<br />
on the scattering angle and the polarization of the incoming wave with respect to the scattering<br />
plane. The result is that after a few scattering events in a multiple scattering sample the<br />
photons will have completely lost the memory of their initial polarization. Multiply scattered<br />
light is therefore unpolarized.<br />
17