Week 2 FAQ - iSites
Week 2 FAQ - iSites
Week 2 FAQ - iSites
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PS10 <strong>Week</strong> 2 <strong>FAQ</strong><br />
Q: What are matter waves? What is a wave? What is an eigenfunction? What is Psi?<br />
A: At the microscopic level, matter does not exist as point-like or well-bounded objects. Matter<br />
is diffuse, and the distribution of matter often looks like it has wavelike properties. We describe<br />
the distribution of matter by its wavefunction, represented by Ψ(x,y,z,t). At each point in space<br />
and time, Ψ is a complex number. If you try to measure the location of a particle, the probability<br />
of finding it at a particular region of space with volume dx dy dz, at time t, is<br />
| Ψ(x,y,z,t)| 2 dx dy dz. Because | Ψ(x,y,z,t)| 2 is a square of a number, it is always positive, as<br />
required for a probability.<br />
The fact that Ψ is a complex number—in particular that it can be either positive or<br />
negative—means that the wavefunction can undergo constructive or destructive interference with<br />
itself. You can take two solutions for Ψ, and they might add, and enhance the probability of<br />
finding a particle at a spot, or they might cancel, and decrease the probability of finding a<br />
particle at that spot.<br />
Eigenfunctions are embodiments of the function Ψ(x,y,z,t) that have some particularly<br />
useful properties. These properties are:<br />
1) Eigenfunctions are states with constant energy. If Ψ for a particle is an eigenfunction<br />
of the system, then you’ll get the same energy for the particle regardless of when you<br />
measure that energy.<br />
2) Eigenfunctions don’t change shape with time. That is, you can write Ψ(x,y,z,t) as a<br />
product of two functions ψ(x,y,z) x F(t). Once you’ve specified the spatial part of an<br />
eigenfunction, ψ(x,y,z), you know its shape for all time. This is analogous to a<br />
simple vibration of a violin string or a drumhead. These vibrations don’t change<br />
shape with time; only their amplitude grows and shrinks periodically. For<br />
eigenfunctions of the Schrodinger equation, the time part is always F(t) = e -i ω t , where<br />
h ω = E n , and E n is the energy of the eigenstate.<br />
3) For any geometry, there will be a series of eigenfunctions (like the harmonics on a<br />
violin string). Eigenfunctions with more zero-crossings (i.e. more wiggles), tend to<br />
be higher in energy.<br />
4) Any wavefunction Ψ(x,y,z,t) can be represented as a sum of eigenfunctions. This is<br />
analogous to music or speech, where any pattern of sounds can be broken down into a<br />
sum of pure tones.<br />
The shape and energies of the eigenfunctions depend on the environment of the particle. A<br />
particle in a square box has one set of eigenfunctions and energies; a particle in a round box has<br />
a different set; a particle bound by an electrostatic attraction (e.g. an atom) has another set of<br />
eigenfunctions; a particle bound by a spring has a different set. This is just like musical<br />
instruments: a double bass plays one set of notes, a violin plays a different set of notes.<br />
Much of the work in quantum mechanics involves trying to identify the eigenfunctions in<br />
a particular geometry. We won’t do this quantitatively in class, but we’ll discuss qualitatively<br />
the eigenfunctions you find in atoms and molecules.<br />
Q: I understand that light must have sufficient energy to excite an electron in a molecule.<br />
But if a photon has more energy than needed, why won’t that photon be absorbed?
A: Light only gets absorbed when its energy matches the energy difference between an occupied<br />
and an unoccupied level. In principle, if the photon had extra energy, the excess could go into<br />
producing a low energy photon, but this is a very improbably process. Here is an intuitive<br />
explanation. If you think of the radiation as an oscillating electromagnetic field, absorption<br />
occurs when the frequency of oscillation of the field matches an intrinsic resonance frequency of<br />
electrons in the atom or molecule. The electrons are set oscillating by the field, and this sucks<br />
energy out of the field. If the oscillations of the field are either too high frequency or too low<br />
frequency, they will not resonate with the electrons. It's like pushing a swing: to get the swing<br />
going you have to push it at just the right frequency.<br />
Q: So if the energy of the light must precisely match the energy difference between an<br />
excited and a ground state electron, why aren’t all spectral lines infinitesimally narrow?<br />
A: We only considered the role of electronic excitation in determining an absorption spectrum.<br />
There’s a bit more to the story. As we’ll see soon, molecules can vibrate, and the vibrational<br />
energies are quantized too. However, the spacing of the vibrational energy levels is much closer<br />
together than the spacing of the electronic energy levels. Each electronic state has associated<br />
with it many vibrational states, all of slightly different energies. The molecule has so many<br />
closely spaced energy transitions that we see them as a broadly distributed continuum.<br />
Atoms have no vibrations, so spectral lines of atomic vapors tend to be narrow. However,<br />
atomic lines are still broadened by the Doppler effect: in a vapor, some atoms are moving<br />
towards the source, and some are moving away. So each atom “sees” a slightly different<br />
frequency of the incident light. This broadens the absorption spectrum of the vapor. In gases at<br />
very low temperatures and pressures, spectral lines can become exceedingly narrow. This occurs<br />
in interstellar space and in some specialized physics experiments.<br />
Q: What is the probability of finding a particle with energy intermediate between the<br />
energies of two eigenstates (i.e. during a transition)?<br />
A: Zero! If you measure the energy of a particle, then you will *always* get the energy of one<br />
of the eigenstates. If the wavefunction of a particle is described by a linear combination of<br />
eigenstates, e.g. c 1 psi 1 + c 2 psi 2 , then the probability of getting energy E 1 associated with state 1<br />
is |c 1 | 2 and the probability of getting energy E 2 associated with state 2 is |c 2 | 2 . So if you repeat<br />
the experiment many times, the average energy might lie between E 1 and E 2 . But each<br />
measurement will only yield outcomes E 1 or E 2 .