novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows
novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows
The supernatant, following centrifugation with Protein Precipitation Solution, was removed into a 15ml tube containing 3ml isopropanol 100% and inverted approximately 50 times. The DNA was precipitated out of solution using isopropanol. After centrifuging (DuPont Sorvall RC5C) for 10 minutes a small white pellet remained. If no pellet was present then the sample was stored at -21˚C overnight and re-centrifuged. The supernatant was pipetted off carefully avoiding the pellet and surrounding area. The supernatant was then washed with 2ml 70% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), inverted several times and centrifuged for 10 minutes. After centrifugation the DNA pellet was air dried and rehydrated with 250µl DNA Hydration Solution (supplied with the kit) and incubated at 65˚C for 1 hour (Techne DRI-BLOCK DB.3A). Concentrations were measured by nanodrop prior to PCR. 3.2.4.2 PCR 100ng genomic DNA (gDNA) was then amplified by PCR using primers specific for the GnRH-R. Primers were designed using the DNA sequence obtained from the NCBI Genbank for locus AF034950 Bos taurus GnRH-R. The sequence for the forward primer was 5’ GGTTTTTTTTTTAGAAAAC 3’ and the sequence for the reverse primer was 5’ GAACAGTGGTTTTCATTCTG 3’. Purified primers were obtained (HPSF; high purity salt free) from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK). PCR reactions were assembled as described in Table 3.2 and performed using the Eppendorf Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Stevenage, UK), with the following thermal cycling conditions: 95˚C for 30 seconds, 30 cycles of 95˚C for 30 seconds, 59˚C for 30 seconds, 68˚C for 30 seconds and final extension of 68˚C for 5 minutes. Table 3.2 PCR reaction reagents Reagent Volume (μl) Quick-Load Taq 2X Master Mix 25 MgCl 2 (25mM) 1 Forward Primer (10μM) 2 Reverse Primer (10μM) 2 Water To top up to 50μl 3.2.4.3 DNA Clean Up PCR products were mixed with loading dye and run on 1% agarose gel in TAE buffer with ethidium bromide slowly at 65V until sufficient separation 74
was achieved. PCR products were removed from the gel using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Sussex, UK). The DNA band was excised using a scalpel under a UV light machine and dissolved at 50˚C on a heat block (Techne DRI-BLOCK DB.3A) in 3 volumes of Buffer QG (supplied with the kit) to bind the DNA. Samples in solution were added to a QIAquick spin column in a 2ml collection tube (both supplied with the kit), and samples centrifuged (MiniSpin, Eppendorf, Stevenage, UK) at 10000rpm for 1 minute. 700µl of Buffer PE (supplied with the kit) was then added to the column, centrifuged at 10000rpm for 1 minute, and the process repeated to wash the DNA. The empty column and collecting tube were then centrifuged for 1 minute to remove the residual alcohol, before eluting the DNA with 30µl of 2mM Tris solution, pH 7.0-8.5 and centrifuging for 1 minute to collect the purified PCR product. 3.2.4.4 DNA Sequencing Samples were sent for sequencing (Beckman CEQ8000 Sequencer) with the PCR primers detailed in section 3.2.4.2 for the promoter region of the bovine GnRH receptor gene, which identified the SNPs at positions 966 and 1189. 3.2.5 Statistical Analyses Statistical analysis was carried out using Genstat 14th edition (VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK). Activity data were analysed as generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) using the residual maximum likelihood (REML) procedure, with Poisson distribution and logarithmic link function. The model fitted fixed effects for SNPs (variates; wildtype homozygote, 0; heterozygote, 1; mutant homozygote, 2). For the random effects of the model, individual cows represented subjects to allow for multiple oestruses per cow but only 1 SNP per cow. The significance of fixed effects was assessed by Wald tests. The resulting model was: Y il = µ + S i + C l + ε il Other variables were then included into the statistical model fitted as fixed effects for SNPs (variates; wildtype homozygote, 0; heterozygote, 1; mutant homozygote, 2), parity (classified according to lactation number as 1, 2 and ≥3) and oestrus time period (classified as Jan-Mar, 1; Apr-Jun, 2; Jul-Sept, 3; Oct-Dec, 4). This was to account for the combined effects on activity, eliminating external cow factors and seasonal effects to 75
- Page 39 and 40: engage in more natural behaviours i
- Page 41 and 42: 1983). Exact explanations and mecha
- Page 43 and 44: 2006) and disruption of LH secretio
- Page 45 and 46: 1.4.3.2 Milk Yield and Nutrition Di
- Page 47 and 48: influence the ability of the ovary
- Page 49 and 50: cyclicity can be delayed if dietary
- Page 51 and 52: indication for the optimal time to
- Page 53 and 54: calving), 3) pre-breeding heat date
- Page 55 and 56: 1.5.2 Physiological Changes Physiol
- Page 57 and 58: 1.5.2.3 Body and Milk Temperature T
- Page 59 and 60: physical activity and stage of the
- Page 61 and 62: caused by the general environment t
- Page 63 and 64: may be gained. This is because data
- Page 65 and 66: In summary the objective was to for
- Page 67 and 68: diet, with concentrates at milking.
- Page 69 and 70: oestrus was defined as 3 consecutiv
- Page 71 and 72: The interaction between parity and
- Page 73 and 74: individual oestrus was not signific
- Page 75 and 76: Table 2.4 The effects of the intera
- Page 77 and 78: (361 vs. 578 points, respectively,
- Page 79 and 80: oestrous expression with increasing
- Page 81 and 82: the blood (Sangsritavong et al., 20
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 3 - Single Nucleotide Polym
- Page 85 and 86: population owing to previous select
- Page 87 and 88: Table 3.1 Cont. Follicle Stimulatin
- Page 89: 3.2.4 Sequencing of DNA in the Labo
- Page 93 and 94: 3.4 DISCUSSION The objectives of th
- Page 95 and 96: fertility and oestrous expression.
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 4 - Development of a Novel
- Page 99 and 100: In summary UWB seems a good option
- Page 101 and 102: Initial tests were carried out to i
- Page 103 and 104: Therefore this demonstrates that X
- Page 105 and 106: which is most important for achievi
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.9 Horizontal - Vertical Di
- Page 109 and 110: that UWB is matching the ‘truth
- Page 111 and 112: mounting cow. For example height ch
- Page 113 and 114: Backpack 1 st put on in AI stalls E
- Page 115 and 116: Cows’ behaviour was assessed at 5
- Page 117 and 118: or that the cows were in an area of
- Page 119 and 120: plane, but mostly in achieving high
- Page 121 and 122: Develop techniques for analysis of
- Page 123 and 124: in elastic silicone moulded over a
- Page 125 and 126: and time of mount, duration of moun
- Page 127 and 128: observed matched with increases in
- Page 129 and 130: 5.3 RESULTS Results demonstrate pos
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 5.2 Graph showing mounting b
- Page 133 and 134: Table 5.1 Results from POC 2 showin
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5.3 Efficiency and accuracy o
- Page 137 and 138: oestrus and oestrus it is clear to
- Page 139 and 140: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
was achieved. PCR products were removed from the gel us<strong>in</strong>g the QIAquick<br />
Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Sussex, UK). The DNA b<strong>and</strong> was excised us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
scalpel under a UV light mach<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> dissolved at 50˚C on a heat block<br />
(Techne DRI-BLOCK DB.3A) <strong>in</strong> 3 volumes <strong>of</strong> Buffer QG (supplied with the<br />
kit) <strong>to</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d the DNA. Samples <strong>in</strong> solution were added <strong>to</strong> a QIAquick sp<strong>in</strong><br />
column <strong>in</strong> a 2ml collection tube (both supplied with the kit), <strong>and</strong> samples<br />
centrifuged (M<strong>in</strong>iSp<strong>in</strong>, Eppendorf, Stevenage, UK) at 10000rpm for 1<br />
m<strong>in</strong>ute. 700µl <strong>of</strong> Buffer PE (supplied with the kit) was then added <strong>to</strong> the<br />
column, centrifuged at 10000rpm for 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute, <strong>and</strong> the process repeated<br />
<strong>to</strong> wash the DNA. The empty column <strong>and</strong> collect<strong>in</strong>g tube were then<br />
centrifuged for 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>to</strong> remove the residual alcohol, before elut<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
DNA with 30µl <strong>of</strong> 2mM Tris solution, pH 7.0-8.5 <strong>and</strong> centrifug<strong>in</strong>g for 1<br />
m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>to</strong> collect the purified PCR product.<br />
3.2.4.4 DNA Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Samples were sent for sequenc<strong>in</strong>g (Beckman CEQ8000 Sequencer) with<br />
the PCR primers detailed <strong>in</strong> section 3.2.4.2 for the promoter region <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bov<strong>in</strong>e GnRH recep<strong>to</strong>r gene, which identified the SNPs at positions 966 <strong>and</strong><br />
1189.<br />
3.2.5 Statistical Analyses<br />
Statistical analysis was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g Genstat 14th edition (VSN<br />
International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK). Activity data were analysed as<br />
generalized l<strong>in</strong>ear mixed models (GLMM) us<strong>in</strong>g the residual maximum<br />
likelihood (REML) procedure, with Poisson distribution <strong>and</strong> logarithmic l<strong>in</strong>k<br />
function. The model fitted fixed effects for SNPs (variates; wildtype<br />
homozygote, 0; heterozygote, 1; mutant homozygote, 2). For the r<strong>and</strong>om<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the model, <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>cows</strong> represented subjects <strong>to</strong> allow for<br />
multiple <strong>oestrus</strong>es per cow but only 1 SNP per cow. The significance <strong>of</strong><br />
fixed effects was assessed by Wald tests. The result<strong>in</strong>g model was:<br />
Y il = µ + S i + C l + ε il<br />
Other variables were then <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the statistical model fitted as fixed<br />
effects for SNPs (variates; wildtype homozygote, 0; heterozygote, 1;<br />
mutant homozygote, 2), parity (classified accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> lactation number as<br />
1, 2 <strong>and</strong> ≥3) <strong>and</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> time period (classified as Jan-Mar, 1; Apr-Jun, 2;<br />
Jul-Sept, 3; Oct-Dec, 4). This was <strong>to</strong> account for the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects on<br />
activity, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g external cow fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> seasonal effects <strong>to</strong><br />
75