novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

season of attainment of puberty can influence age at puberty in heifers (Schillo et al., 1983). Seasonal changes in peripheral concentrations of gonadotrophins have been reported (Critser et al., 1987), which could explain the influence of season and photoperiodic variations in activity levels at oestrus. An increase in LH release in cows has been reported in summer compared to winter (Hansen et al 1982), perhaps related to the effects of oestradiol, as described for the sheep (Legan et al., 1977). This might explain how photoperiod can affect reproductive behaviour, especially oestrous expression. 2.4.2 Effect of Milk Yield on Increase in Activity There was an association between increasing milk yield and declining activity and oestrous expression. This trend follows the widely recognised change in cattle reproductive physiology recorded over the past 50+ years, coupled with rapidly increasing milk production since the 1950s (Lucy, 2001). The average increase in yield from 2010/11 to 2011/12 is 241 litres per cow with the average yield at 7617 litres per cow per annum (provisional 2012 data; DairyCo, 2012a). However poor conception rates still persist (Royal et al., 2000a;Butler, 2003). High milk yields have been reported to affect oestrous expression. Harrison et al., (1990) reported that low yielders showed stronger oestrous expression than high yielders. When comparing the duration of oestrus in high and low yielders, low yielders had a longer duration of oestrus, 10.9 vs. 6.2 hours. Total standing events was also increased, 8.8 vs. 6.3, as was total standing time, 28.2 vs. 21.7 seconds (Lopez et al., 2004). Studies of activity also concur with the results of the current study where there was a clear pattern between high milk production and lower activity at oestrus (Yániz et al., 2006). Lopez-Gatius et al. (2005) also reported that for each 1kg increase in milk yield walking activity at oestrus decreased by 1.6%. Possible explanation for the effects of milk yield on reduced activity at oestrus is through the interlinking reproductive and somatotropic axes which can be influenced by metabolite levels and influence hormone production (Chagas et al., 2007). High yielding animals require a high plane of nutrition, which increases the rate of metabolic clearance by the liver, rapidly removing steroid hormones, oestradiol and progesterone from 64

the blood (Sangsritavong et al., 2002). This results in lower circulating oestradiol and a reduced duration in the system (Lopez et al., 2004), which could impact on oestrous expression. Furthermore NEBAL related to high producing cows (discussed in Section 2.4.1.1) can affect the level of oestrous expression. NEBAL attenuates LH pulse frequency which inhibits oestradiol secretion which in turn prevents ovulation. Low energy status coupled with supressing LH pulses also seems to reduce the responsiveness of the ovary to LH, again inhibiting the production of oestradiol (Butler, 2003) with subsequent impacts upon oestrous expression. Furthermore NEBAL is strongly associated with low levels of blood glucose, insulin and IGF-1 post partum which can limit oestradiol production by the dominant follicle. Metabolic demand causes a reduction in levels of glucose, insulin ang IGF-1. Glucose and insulin are associated with the upregulation of LH receptors in the ovary. Indeed insulin and IGF-1 are linked as IGF-1 production is affected by circulating insulin concentrations. IGF-1 levels are also directly related to energy levels are correlate with oestradiol concentrations. This results in an alteration of the sensitivity of the response of the pituitary gland to GnRH, affecting LH pulses, influencing ovarian follicular development and the capability of the follicles to produce oestradiol (Butler, 2003). Milk yield is also affected by season and photoperiod thought to be associated with the effects of increasing IGF-1 related to long day photoperiod increasing milk yield (Dahl et al., 2000). Therefore oestrous expression may be affected through increased yield and the effects of IGF- 1 influencing oestradiol production. 2.4.3 Activity Increase and Conception Rate In the current study when activity was increased, the probability of conception occurring increased although this results was not significant (P=0.064). Out of 773 inseminations at observed oestrus only 243 resulted in pregnancy. It has been reported that the probability of conception occurring increases with increasing oestrous number (Darwash et al., 1997b). Also the chance of a cow conceiving is increased with greater oestradiol levels (Lopes et al., 2007;Perry et al., 1991). Pre-ovulatory follicle size has been directly related to oestradiol concentration on the day of AI (P

season <strong>of</strong> atta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> puberty can <strong>in</strong>fluence age at puberty <strong>in</strong> heifers<br />

(Schillo et al., 1983).<br />

Seasonal changes <strong>in</strong> peripheral concentrations <strong>of</strong> gonadotroph<strong>in</strong>s have<br />

been reported (Critser et al., 1987), which could expla<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong><br />

season <strong>and</strong> pho<strong>to</strong>periodic variations <strong>in</strong> activity levels at <strong>oestrus</strong>. An<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> LH release <strong>in</strong> <strong>cows</strong> has been reported <strong>in</strong> summer compared <strong>to</strong><br />

w<strong>in</strong>ter (Hansen et al 1982), perhaps related <strong>to</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> oestradiol, as<br />

described for the sheep (Legan et al., 1977). This might expla<strong>in</strong> how<br />

pho<strong>to</strong>period can affect reproductive behaviour, especially oestrous<br />

<strong>expression</strong>.<br />

2.4.2 Effect <strong>of</strong> Milk Yield on Increase <strong>in</strong> Activity<br />

There was an association between <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g milk yield <strong>and</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

activity <strong>and</strong> oestrous <strong>expression</strong>. This trend follows the widely recognised<br />

change <strong>in</strong> cattle reproductive physiology recorded over the past 50+ years,<br />

coupled with rapidly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g milk production s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1950s (Lucy,<br />

2001). The average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> yield from 2010/11 <strong>to</strong> 2011/12 is 241 litres<br />

per cow with the average yield at 7617 litres per cow per annum<br />

(provisional 2012 data; DairyCo, 2012a). However poor conception rates<br />

still persist (Royal et al., 2000a;Butler, 2003).<br />

High milk yields have been reported <strong>to</strong> affect oestrous <strong>expression</strong>. Harrison<br />

et al., (1990) reported that low yielders showed stronger oestrous<br />

<strong>expression</strong> than high yielders. When compar<strong>in</strong>g the duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

high <strong>and</strong> low yielders, low yielders had a longer duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong>, 10.9<br />

vs. 6.2 hours. Total st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g events was also <strong>in</strong>creased, 8.8 vs. 6.3, as was<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g time, 28.2 vs. 21.7 seconds (Lopez et al., 2004). Studies <strong>of</strong><br />

activity also concur with the results <strong>of</strong> the current study where there was a<br />

clear pattern between high milk production <strong>and</strong> lower activity at <strong>oestrus</strong><br />

(Yániz et al., 2006). Lopez-Gatius et al. (2005) also reported that for each<br />

1kg <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> milk yield walk<strong>in</strong>g activity at <strong>oestrus</strong> decreased by 1.6%.<br />

Possible explanation for the effects <strong>of</strong> milk yield on reduced activity at<br />

<strong>oestrus</strong> is through the <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g reproductive <strong>and</strong> soma<strong>to</strong>tropic axes<br />

which can be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by metabolite levels <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence hormone<br />

production (Chagas et al., 2007). High yield<strong>in</strong>g animals require a high<br />

plane <strong>of</strong> nutrition, which <strong>in</strong>creases the rate <strong>of</strong> metabolic clearance by the<br />

liver, rapidly remov<strong>in</strong>g steroid hormones, oestradiol <strong>and</strong> progesterone from<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!