novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

loss of body condition, due to energy balance regulation, which has been related to poor oestrous expression (Mayne et al., 2002). NEBAL and loss of body condition has been related to attenuation of LH pulse frequency and low levels of blood glucose, insulin and IGF-1 which together impair the production of oestradiol by the dominant follicle (Butler, 2003). However, Macmillan et al., (1996) also found that the effect of milk yield and stage of lactation was not an absolute indicator of NEBAL. Lower yielding cows could also have lower feed intake and thus have a more severe energy deficit which could affect oestrus. However NEBAL is highly correlated with genetic improvement for milk yield (Veerkamp and Beerda, 2007). A further possibility is that as cows get older their activity decreases due to age (Lovendahl and Chagunda, 2009). It is also possible that cows are culled for infertility and only fertile cows survive to the next lactation; so a larger proportion of the cows in later lactations display oestrous behaviour and oestrus is more easily detected. 2.4.1.2 Oestrous Number As oestrous cycles progressed without conception the activity at each oestrus decreased post partum. Typically the first oestrus post partum is silent (Ferguson, 1996) and it is possible that the first oestrus was removed from analysis in this study. All oestruses before 25 days post partum were removed, due to increased activity levels because of re-entry of cows into the herd after solitary calving, due to increased activity associated with the establishment of hierarchies. The current results demonstrate that activity is greater at the 2 nd oestrus, although there was no significant difference between activity at 1 st and 2 nd oestrus. Therefore activity at oestrus decreased from the 3 rd oestrus onwards. Previous reports have suggested a similar pattern, that oestrous expression increases up to the third oestrous cycle post partum (Ferguson, 1996;Thatcher and Wilcox, 1973). Peralta et al., (2005) reported a significant increase in number of standing events in cows less than 79 days in milk, compared to those more than 80 days in milk, where there was also a larger proportion of problem cows (Peralta et al., 2005). This is in agreement with results of the current study and provides an explanation for increased activity in the first oestrous cycles after calving. Another possible explanation for the decrease in 62

oestrous expression with increasing lactation is that a greater cumulative yield of milk has been produced. However these cows are moving into positive EBAL so it is less likely that the effects of lactation yield are seen on oestrous expression at this stage. Lower activity levels in later lactation could be related to the larger proportion of problem cows more than 80 days in milk (Peralta et al., 2005). In conclusion there may be many underlying causes for decreased oestrous expression and it is possible that problem cows do not survive to get in calf due to culling for infertility. 2.4.1.3 Time of Year There was a larger increase in activity at oestrus, in periods 2 and 3 compared to periods 1 and 4. Periods 2 and 3 are normally associated with hotter temperatures, and it is suggested that heat stress and factors associated with heat stress, affecting follicle development and steroidogenesis, can influence oestrous expression (Roche, 2006). Reports in this area are inconsistent; some authors report increased expression of oestrus in the hotter, summer months (Peralta et al., 2005); others report the opposite, with increased expression in the colder, winter months (Nebel et al., 1997). However, the patterns associated with temperature are mostly from outside the UK, and few reports from studies in the UK have found any association between temperature and oestrous expression. This relationship applies more to countries with hot climates with large fluctuations in temperature. Some components of the reproductive system are susceptible to extreme temperatures compromising the steroidogenic capabilities of the theca and granulosa cells (Wolfenson et al., 2000;De Rensis and Scaramuzzi, 2003). The results of the current study, however were recorded in the UK temperate climate and therefore could be affected by other causal effects of seasonal variation on reproduction; day length, photoperiod, humidity, level of nutrition, management or combinations of these factors (Critser et al., 1987). Cattle are not seasonal breeders in the strictest sense, as they now breed and cycle all year round, but seasonal influences can have an effect. This is more subtle than in the sheep, in which reproduction can only occur at certain times of year and is strictly controlled by photoperiod influencing the ability of oestrogens to inhibit LH (Legan et al., 1977). The influence of season on cattle reproduction has been linked to a number of events associated with reproduction; return to cyclicity is longer if calving is in winter compared to summer (Hansen, 1985) and season of birth and 63

loss <strong>of</strong> body condition, due <strong>to</strong> energy balance regulation, which has been<br />

related <strong>to</strong> poor oestrous <strong>expression</strong> (Mayne et al., 2002). NEBAL <strong>and</strong> loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> body condition has been related <strong>to</strong> attenuation <strong>of</strong> LH pulse frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> low levels <strong>of</strong> blood glucose, <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> IGF-1 which <strong>to</strong>gether impair<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> oestradiol by the dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle (Butler, 2003).<br />

However, Macmillan et al., (1996) also found that the effect <strong>of</strong> milk yield<br />

<strong>and</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> lactation was not an absolute <strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> NEBAL. Lower<br />

yield<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cows</strong> could also have lower feed <strong>in</strong>take <strong>and</strong> thus have a more<br />

severe energy deficit which could affect <strong>oestrus</strong>. However NEBAL is highly<br />

correlated with genetic improvement for milk yield (Veerkamp <strong>and</strong> Beerda,<br />

2007).<br />

A further possibility is that as <strong>cows</strong> get older their activity decreases due <strong>to</strong><br />

age (Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Chagunda, 2009). It is also possible that <strong>cows</strong> are<br />

culled for <strong>in</strong>fertility <strong>and</strong> only fertile <strong>cows</strong> survive <strong>to</strong> the next lactation; so a<br />

larger proportion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>cows</strong> <strong>in</strong> later lactations display oestrous behaviour<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> is more easily detected.<br />

2.4.1.2 Oestrous Number<br />

As oestrous cycles progressed without conception the activity at each<br />

<strong>oestrus</strong> decreased post partum. Typically the first <strong>oestrus</strong> post partum is<br />

silent (Ferguson, 1996) <strong>and</strong> it is possible that the first <strong>oestrus</strong> was<br />

removed from analysis <strong>in</strong> this study. All <strong>oestrus</strong>es before 25 days post<br />

partum were removed, due <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased activity levels because <strong>of</strong> re-entry<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>cows</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the herd after solitary calv<strong>in</strong>g, due <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased activity<br />

associated with the establishment <strong>of</strong> hierarchies. The current results<br />

demonstrate that activity is greater at the 2 nd <strong>oestrus</strong>, although there was<br />

no significant difference between activity at 1 st <strong>and</strong> 2 nd <strong>oestrus</strong>. Therefore<br />

activity at <strong>oestrus</strong> decreased from the 3 rd <strong>oestrus</strong> onwards. Previous<br />

reports have suggested a similar pattern, that oestrous <strong>expression</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creases up <strong>to</strong> the third oestrous cycle post partum (Ferguson,<br />

1996;Thatcher <strong>and</strong> Wilcox, 1973).<br />

Peralta et al., (2005) reported a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> number <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

events <strong>in</strong> <strong>cows</strong> less than 79 days <strong>in</strong> milk, compared <strong>to</strong> those more than 80<br />

days <strong>in</strong> milk, where there was also a larger proportion <strong>of</strong> problem <strong>cows</strong><br />

(Peralta et al., 2005). This is <strong>in</strong> agreement with results <strong>of</strong> the current study<br />

<strong>and</strong> provides an explanation for <strong>in</strong>creased activity <strong>in</strong> the first oestrous<br />

cycles after calv<strong>in</strong>g. Another possible explanation for the decrease <strong>in</strong><br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!