25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>oestrus</strong> was def<strong>in</strong>ed as 3 consecutive periods <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased activity<br />

compared with the basel<strong>in</strong>e before the onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased activity. The<br />

smallest threshold for activity <strong>in</strong>crease was 30% from basel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Herd fertility records provided <strong>in</strong>formation on each <strong>oestrus</strong>, <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

<strong>and</strong> whether this resulted <strong>in</strong> pregnancy. General <strong>in</strong>formation about each<br />

cow, such as milk yield, was downloaded <strong>to</strong> the system dur<strong>in</strong>g milk<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

All data were compiled <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a database <strong>to</strong> identify associations between<br />

activity data for oestrous <strong>expression</strong> <strong>and</strong> cow fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as age, stage <strong>of</strong><br />

lactation, milk production <strong>and</strong> time <strong>of</strong> year when <strong>oestrus</strong> occurred, <strong>and</strong><br />

whether conception was successful after AI. The data collected are<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 2.1.<br />

2.2.3 Statistical Analyses<br />

Statistical analysis was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g Genstat 15th edition (VSN<br />

International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK). Activity data were analysed as<br />

generalized l<strong>in</strong>ear mixed models (GLMM) us<strong>in</strong>g the residual maximum<br />

likelihood (REML) procedure, with Poisson distribution <strong>and</strong> logarithmic l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

function. The model fitted fixed effects for days <strong>in</strong> milk (DIM), milk yield<br />

(all def<strong>in</strong>itions; Table 2.1), parity (classified accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> lactation number<br />

as 1, 2 <strong>and</strong> ≥3), oestrous number <strong>and</strong> time <strong>of</strong> year (classified as Jan-Mar,<br />

1; Apr-Jun, 2; Jul-Sept, 3; Oct-Dec, 4), <strong>in</strong>dividually. For the r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the model, <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>cows</strong> represented subjects <strong>to</strong> allow for<br />

multiple <strong>oestrus</strong>es per cow. The significance <strong>of</strong> fixed effects was assessed<br />

by Wald tests. The result<strong>in</strong>g model was:<br />

Y ij = µ + V i + C j + ε ij<br />

where Y ij is activity at <strong>oestrus</strong>,<br />

the fixed part <strong>of</strong> the model consists <strong>of</strong><br />

µ the overall mean,<br />

V i the effect <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual variable (Table 2.1),<br />

C j the r<strong>and</strong>om effect <strong>of</strong> Cow, <strong>and</strong><br />

ε ij the residual error.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!