novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

CHAPTER 2 – Effect of Cow Factors on Oestrous Expression 2.1 INTRODUCTION A main contributory factor to poor fertility in the dairy cow (Royal et al., 2000a;Butler, 2003) is poor oestrous expression; only 50% of cows are reported to show signs of standing to be mounted, the definite sign that a cow is in oestrus (Van Eerdenburg et al., 2002). Other measures of oestrus suggest that duration and intensity of oestrus has also decreased; only 8.5 standing events at oestrus and duration only lasting on average 7 hours in Holsteins (Dransfield et al., 1998). Associations have been found between parity (Macmillan et al., 1996) (Garnsworthy et al., 2008), seasonal variations (Critser et al., 1987) and milk yield (Royal et al., 2000a) and their effects on fertility. Previous work has recognised that oestrous expression can be influenced by cow factors, focussing on duration and intensity, and standing events (Van Eerdenburg et al., 1996;Peralta et al., 2005), but there have been few investigations into the effects of cow factors and their associations with activity at oestrus, measured by activity monitors. Emphasis should be placed on identifying cows at risk of poor oestrous expression. It is important to identify factors that affect oestrous expression in order to implement management systems for improvement of oestrous detection. This study investigated the effects of parity, time period of oestrus, oestrous number, days post partum and milk yield for their effects on activity. Associations between the activity increase on day of oestrus and probability of conception were also investigated. The aims of this study were to identify the effects of measurable cow factors on activity increases at oestrus. 2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.2.1 Animals Animals used in this study were 205 Holstein Friesian dairy cows housed at Nottingham University Dairy Centre. The lactating cows were kept indoors in groups of approximately 40. Housing consisted of a purpose built shed with 4 pens, which was well ventilated, with rubber matting, cubicles and shavings for comfort whilst lying. All cows were fed the same silage based 50

diet, with concentrates at milking. Cows were milked by 4 robotic milkers (Lely Astronaut A3 AMS units) voluntarily; visiting from 2 to 6 times per day. Oestrous detection was measured by activity monitors with data downloaded by infrared sensors, and by visual observation. Three full time staff were employed to work at the dairy unit, of which 2 were working at any one time. Cows were checked for signs of oestrus by the herdsperson first thing in the morning, at approximately 6am, and again in the evening, between 8pm and 10pm. However, this left a long period of time in which the cows were not monitored and could exhibit oestrous behaviour which could go undetected, if visual observation was the only method of detection. 2.2.2 Data Collection and Analyses Activity monitors were worn around the cows’ necks (Figure 2.1), measuring daily activity and identified increases which signalled that a cow was in oestrus. The cows wore Lely Qwes-HR Activity Tags which measured cow movement and movement intensity through a 3 dimensional accelerometer sensor which was expressed as a general activity index. Activity was expressed as counts from an instrument specific algorithm within the activity monitor, which is patented and undisclosed by the manufacturers. Data was recorded by a microprocessor and stored in the memory. Activity data were downloaded at milking from the cows’ transponder, which was read on entry to the robotic milker, but could also be downloaded from infrared identification units which were mounted in the barn. Activity data were downloaded at intervals throughout the day and split into activity units per 2 hour intervals. Figure 2.1 Example of a cow wearing a Lely-HR Tag activity monitor around her neck Activity data spanning 2 years (16.03.2008-11.02.2010) were collated from 205 cows, including 930 individual oestruses across different lactations and different stages of lactation. Activity data was analysed by plotting activity 51

CHAPTER 2 – Effect <strong>of</strong> Cow Fac<strong>to</strong>rs on Oestrous<br />

Expression<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

A ma<strong>in</strong> contribu<strong>to</strong>ry fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> poor fertility <strong>in</strong> the <strong>dairy</strong> cow (Royal et al.,<br />

2000a;Butler, 2003) is poor oestrous <strong>expression</strong>; only 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>cows</strong> are<br />

reported <strong>to</strong> show signs <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> be mounted, the def<strong>in</strong>ite sign that a<br />

cow is <strong>in</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> (Van Eerdenburg et al., 2002). Other measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong><br />

suggest that duration <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> has also decreased; only 8.5<br />

st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g events at <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>and</strong> duration only last<strong>in</strong>g on average 7 hours <strong>in</strong><br />

Holste<strong>in</strong>s (Dransfield et al., 1998).<br />

Associations have been found between parity (Macmillan et al., 1996)<br />

(Garnsworthy et al., 2008), seasonal variations (Critser et al., 1987) <strong>and</strong><br />

milk yield (Royal et al., 2000a) <strong>and</strong> their effects on fertility. Previous work<br />

has recognised that oestrous <strong>expression</strong> can be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by cow fac<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

focuss<strong>in</strong>g on duration <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity, <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g events (Van Eerdenburg<br />

et al., 1996;Peralta et al., 2005), but there have been few <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> cow fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> their associations with activity at<br />

<strong>oestrus</strong>, measured by activity moni<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

Emphasis should be placed on identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cows</strong> at risk <strong>of</strong> poor oestrous<br />

<strong>expression</strong>. It is important <strong>to</strong> identify fac<strong>to</strong>rs that affect oestrous<br />

<strong>expression</strong> <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> implement management systems for improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

oestrous <strong>detection</strong>. This study <strong>in</strong>vestigated the effects <strong>of</strong> parity, time<br />

period <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong>, oestrous number, days post partum <strong>and</strong> milk yield for<br />

their effects on activity. Associations between the activity <strong>in</strong>crease on day<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>and</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> conception were also <strong>in</strong>vestigated. The aims <strong>of</strong><br />

this study were <strong>to</strong> identify the effects <strong>of</strong> measurable cow fac<strong>to</strong>rs on activity<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases at <strong>oestrus</strong>.<br />

2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

2.2.1 Animals<br />

Animals used <strong>in</strong> this study were 205 Holste<strong>in</strong> Friesian <strong>dairy</strong> <strong>cows</strong> housed at<br />

Nott<strong>in</strong>gham University Dairy Centre. The lactat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cows</strong> were kept <strong>in</strong>doors<br />

<strong>in</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> approximately 40. Hous<strong>in</strong>g consisted <strong>of</strong> a purpose built shed<br />

with 4 pens, which was well ventilated, with rubber matt<strong>in</strong>g, cubicles <strong>and</strong><br />

shav<strong>in</strong>gs for comfort whilst ly<strong>in</strong>g. All <strong>cows</strong> were fed the same silage based<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!