25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

applicable <strong>to</strong> every production system such as tie stall <strong>cows</strong>; <strong>detection</strong> rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> only 14-20% (Firk et al., 2002), or when <strong>cows</strong> do not display any<br />

activity <strong>in</strong>crease for various reasons; ill health, lameness or when the<br />

threshold for <strong>in</strong>creased activity is not reached (Roel<strong>of</strong>s et al., 2005).<br />

1.5.3.2 Electronic Heat Mount Detec<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Electronic heat mount detec<strong>to</strong>rs such as HeatWatch are similar <strong>to</strong> pressure<br />

activated heat mount detec<strong>to</strong>rs (see Section 1.5.1.5) without the need for<br />

visual observation. These radio telemetric devices measure the pressure<br />

from st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g activity; which is def<strong>in</strong>ed as 3 st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g events <strong>in</strong> 4 hours.<br />

When activated a radio signal is emitted which is picked up by a receiver/<br />

repeater, relayed <strong>to</strong> a buffer then ultimately <strong>to</strong> a computer where the<br />

important <strong>in</strong>formation for the herdsman is s<strong>to</strong>red. The identity <strong>of</strong> the cow,<br />

time <strong>of</strong> mount, date <strong>and</strong> duration are all recorded, <strong>and</strong> from this tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

heat onset <strong>and</strong> time for AI can be estimated. Different lists are also<br />

generated: <strong>oestrus</strong>, suspected <strong>oestrus</strong>, non return (no mounts <strong>in</strong> 25 days),<br />

brief cycle (13 day cycles) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>active list (At-Taras <strong>and</strong> Spahr, 2001).<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>detection</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g electronic heat mount detec<strong>to</strong>rs is reported as<br />

86.8%, which was similar <strong>to</strong> record<strong>in</strong>gs from activity moni<strong>to</strong>rs when<br />

compared (At-Taras <strong>and</strong> Spahr, 2001) with a low error rate <strong>of</strong> 2% (Rorie et<br />

al., 2002). However when compared <strong>to</strong> visual <strong>detection</strong> electronic heat<br />

mount detec<strong>to</strong>rs were more efficient, 91% compared <strong>to</strong> 51%, respectively,<br />

due <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> quick identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>cows</strong> not show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>oestrus</strong>. Peralta et al. (2005), however, reported different efficiencies when<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>detection</strong> methods under compromised conditions. Visual<br />

<strong>detection</strong> <strong>and</strong> HeatWatch had similar efficiency; 49.3% <strong>and</strong> 48% <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong><br />

periods detected, respectively, with lower efficiency for activity moni<strong>to</strong>rs;<br />

37.2%. Moreover, <strong>in</strong> this study the conception rate for <strong>cows</strong> detected by<br />

HeatWatch was much greater than that <strong>of</strong> visual <strong>detection</strong>, 17.3 vs 6.2%<br />

respectively.<br />

Therefore, electronic heat mount detec<strong>to</strong>rs are efficient at detect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>oestrus</strong> as they moni<strong>to</strong>r cont<strong>in</strong>uously. However they only detect st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

behaviour <strong>and</strong> do not take <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account secondary signs <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> which<br />

are important as not all <strong>cows</strong> st<strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> be mounted (Dobson et al., 2008).<br />

Although their accuracy is compromised by generat<strong>in</strong>g a number <strong>of</strong> false<br />

negative diagnoses thought <strong>to</strong> be caused by uncoord<strong>in</strong>ated mounts not<br />

trigger<strong>in</strong>g the pressure sensitive device <strong>and</strong> through several false positives<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!