novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

and ruminating and, as results from preliminary trials show (see Chapter 4), mounting behaviour was not inhibited. 5.2.3 Experimental Design Figure 5.1 describes the general experimental design of the proof of concept trials. On day 0 six cows were synchronised with CIDRs. Milk sampling and activity monitoring also commenced on day 0, throughout UWB recording and continuing until 5 days after, to ensure collection of data before, during and after oestrus. On the morning of day 6 UWB recording began and the 6 cows to be synchronised were injected with Estrumate. On day 7 CIDRs were removed, and then during days 8, 9 and 10 cows displayed oestrus. UWB recording ended on the morning of day 13 (for POC 2 and 3; ended prematurely at day 11 for POC 1) after recording UWB data for 24 hours for 7 days. Visual observation and CCTV recording occurred simultaneously with UWB data collection (Figure 5.1). CIDR insertion Estrumate i.m. injection CIDR removal Figure 5.1 A diagram to show the experimental design of proof of concept trials per day. Cows were synchronised with CIDRs at day 0. Milk sampling and activity data collection also began at day 0 through to the end of the trials at day 17. Estrumate injection was administered intramuscularly at day 6, with UWB recording also beginning in the morning of day 6. On day 7 CIDRs were removed which allowed for oestrus to take place on the following days. UWB recording ended on the morning of day 13 recording continuously for 24 hours over 7 days (in POC 2 and 3). UWB recording during POC 1 ended prematurely on day 11. 5.2.4 Synchronisation Six cows were selected for synchronisation and approved for use on trial by the Named Veterinary Surgeon. On day 0 one Eazi-Breed CIDR device (InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand; Cockburn Veterinary Group, Leics, UK) was inserted per vagina of each cow. The CIDR (controlled internal drug releasing) device is an intra-vaginal pessary containing 1.38g progesterone 106

in elastic silicone moulded over a nylon spine, used to synchronise oestrus in ruminants. Insertion was carried out using an applicator disinfected in Savlon solution (Novartis Consumer Health, Horsham, UK; 1:100 dilution). The CIDR was loaded into the applicator and lubricant applied (Vet Lubigel; Dechra Veterinary Practice, Shropshire, UK) to the protruding end of the device. The vagina of the cow was cleaned immediately prior to device insertion and the loaded applicator inserted with a slight upward orientation into the vagina and the CIDR expelled by depressing the end of the applicator. The applicator was withdrawn and disinfected. Following insertion the animal’s blood progesterone reached maximum concentration within an hour of insertion and was maintained until removal. On day 6 2.0ml Estrumate (Cloprostenol sodium; Cockburns Veterinary Group, Leics, UK) was administered to each cow intramuscularly. Estrumate is a synthetic prostaglandin analogue structurally related to PGF 2α , which facilitated regression of the CL if present. At day 7 CIDRs were removed causing progesterone concentration to decline, which allowed oestradiol concentrations to increase due to increased LH pulses (see Chapter 1). Devices were removed by gently pulling on the exposed removal tag. This resulted in oestrus approximately 48 hours later. 5.2.5 Data Collection 5.2.5.1 Ultra-wide Band (UWB) Recording The UWB network was set up (as described in section 4.2.2) with 8 base units (BUs) forming a network to cover the 2 locations in which cows from these studies were housed. All BUs were in direct line of sight to one BU nominated as the master unit, set up in optimal positions to reflect accurate positioning coordinates of the MUs assigned to each cow. Each cow was equipped with 1 MU, the number of each UWB unit recorded against cow number, and one battery. The UWB MUs were set to sample at 2Hz, twice per second, and send their position to the control unit connected to the computer where data was recorded and stored. UWB data recording began on the morning of day 6 and was scheduled to end on the morning of day 13 thus recording cow position by UWB continually for 7 days. Battery changes were scheduled at intervals throughout the trials in order to maintain continuity of data collection. Unfortunately in POC 1 failing battery power and recharging batteries became too frequent and the decision was made to end the trial prematurely at day 11. During POC 2 three different batteries were used to ensure power failure was avoided, 107

<strong>in</strong> elastic silicone moulded over a nylon sp<strong>in</strong>e, used <strong>to</strong> synchronise <strong>oestrus</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> rum<strong>in</strong>ants. Insertion was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g an applica<strong>to</strong>r dis<strong>in</strong>fected <strong>in</strong><br />

Savlon solution (Novartis Consumer Health, Horsham, UK; 1:100 dilution).<br />

The CIDR was loaded <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the applica<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> lubricant applied (Vet Lubigel;<br />

Dechra Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Practice, Shropshire, UK) <strong>to</strong> the protrud<strong>in</strong>g end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

device. The vag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>of</strong> the cow was cleaned immediately prior <strong>to</strong> device<br />

<strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>and</strong> the loaded applica<strong>to</strong>r <strong>in</strong>serted with a slight upward<br />

orientation <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the vag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> the CIDR expelled by depress<strong>in</strong>g the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the applica<strong>to</strong>r. The applica<strong>to</strong>r was withdrawn <strong>and</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>fected. Follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>sertion the animal’s blood progesterone reached maximum concentration<br />

with<strong>in</strong> an hour <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>and</strong> was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed until removal. On day 6<br />

2.0ml Estrumate (Cloprostenol sodium; Cockburns Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Group, Leics,<br />

UK) was adm<strong>in</strong>istered <strong>to</strong> each cow <strong>in</strong>tramuscularly. Estrumate is a<br />

synthetic prostagl<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong> analogue structurally related <strong>to</strong> PGF 2α , which<br />

facilitated regression <strong>of</strong> the CL if present. At day 7 CIDRs were removed<br />

caus<strong>in</strong>g progesterone concentration <strong>to</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e, which allowed oestradiol<br />

concentrations <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease due <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased LH pulses (see Chapter 1).<br />

Devices were removed by gently pull<strong>in</strong>g on the exposed removal tag. This<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> approximately 48 hours later.<br />

5.2.5 Data Collection<br />

5.2.5.1 Ultra-wide B<strong>and</strong> (UWB) Record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The UWB network was set up (as described <strong>in</strong> section 4.2.2) with 8 base<br />

units (BUs) form<strong>in</strong>g a network <strong>to</strong> cover the 2 locations <strong>in</strong> which <strong>cows</strong> from<br />

these studies were housed. All BUs were <strong>in</strong> direct l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> sight <strong>to</strong> one BU<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>ated as the master unit, set up <strong>in</strong> optimal positions <strong>to</strong> reflect<br />

accurate position<strong>in</strong>g coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>of</strong> the MUs assigned <strong>to</strong> each cow. Each<br />

cow was equipped with 1 MU, the number <strong>of</strong> each UWB unit recorded<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st cow number, <strong>and</strong> one battery. The UWB MUs were set <strong>to</strong> sample at<br />

2Hz, twice per second, <strong>and</strong> send their position <strong>to</strong> the control unit connected<br />

<strong>to</strong> the computer where data was recorded <strong>and</strong> s<strong>to</strong>red. UWB data record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

began on the morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> day 6 <strong>and</strong> was scheduled <strong>to</strong> end on the morn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> day 13 thus record<strong>in</strong>g cow position by UWB cont<strong>in</strong>ually for 7 days.<br />

Battery changes were scheduled at <strong>in</strong>tervals throughout the trials <strong>in</strong> order<br />

<strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> data collection. Unfortunately <strong>in</strong> POC 1 fail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

battery power <strong>and</strong> recharg<strong>in</strong>g batteries became <strong>to</strong>o frequent <strong>and</strong> the<br />

decision was made <strong>to</strong> end the trial prematurely at day 11. Dur<strong>in</strong>g POC 2<br />

three different batteries were used <strong>to</strong> ensure power failure was avoided,<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!