novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows
novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows
and ruminating and, as results from preliminary trials show (see Chapter 4), mounting behaviour was not inhibited. 5.2.3 Experimental Design Figure 5.1 describes the general experimental design of the proof of concept trials. On day 0 six cows were synchronised with CIDRs. Milk sampling and activity monitoring also commenced on day 0, throughout UWB recording and continuing until 5 days after, to ensure collection of data before, during and after oestrus. On the morning of day 6 UWB recording began and the 6 cows to be synchronised were injected with Estrumate. On day 7 CIDRs were removed, and then during days 8, 9 and 10 cows displayed oestrus. UWB recording ended on the morning of day 13 (for POC 2 and 3; ended prematurely at day 11 for POC 1) after recording UWB data for 24 hours for 7 days. Visual observation and CCTV recording occurred simultaneously with UWB data collection (Figure 5.1). CIDR insertion Estrumate i.m. injection CIDR removal Figure 5.1 A diagram to show the experimental design of proof of concept trials per day. Cows were synchronised with CIDRs at day 0. Milk sampling and activity data collection also began at day 0 through to the end of the trials at day 17. Estrumate injection was administered intramuscularly at day 6, with UWB recording also beginning in the morning of day 6. On day 7 CIDRs were removed which allowed for oestrus to take place on the following days. UWB recording ended on the morning of day 13 recording continuously for 24 hours over 7 days (in POC 2 and 3). UWB recording during POC 1 ended prematurely on day 11. 5.2.4 Synchronisation Six cows were selected for synchronisation and approved for use on trial by the Named Veterinary Surgeon. On day 0 one Eazi-Breed CIDR device (InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand; Cockburn Veterinary Group, Leics, UK) was inserted per vagina of each cow. The CIDR (controlled internal drug releasing) device is an intra-vaginal pessary containing 1.38g progesterone 106
in elastic silicone moulded over a nylon spine, used to synchronise oestrus in ruminants. Insertion was carried out using an applicator disinfected in Savlon solution (Novartis Consumer Health, Horsham, UK; 1:100 dilution). The CIDR was loaded into the applicator and lubricant applied (Vet Lubigel; Dechra Veterinary Practice, Shropshire, UK) to the protruding end of the device. The vagina of the cow was cleaned immediately prior to device insertion and the loaded applicator inserted with a slight upward orientation into the vagina and the CIDR expelled by depressing the end of the applicator. The applicator was withdrawn and disinfected. Following insertion the animal’s blood progesterone reached maximum concentration within an hour of insertion and was maintained until removal. On day 6 2.0ml Estrumate (Cloprostenol sodium; Cockburns Veterinary Group, Leics, UK) was administered to each cow intramuscularly. Estrumate is a synthetic prostaglandin analogue structurally related to PGF 2α , which facilitated regression of the CL if present. At day 7 CIDRs were removed causing progesterone concentration to decline, which allowed oestradiol concentrations to increase due to increased LH pulses (see Chapter 1). Devices were removed by gently pulling on the exposed removal tag. This resulted in oestrus approximately 48 hours later. 5.2.5 Data Collection 5.2.5.1 Ultra-wide Band (UWB) Recording The UWB network was set up (as described in section 4.2.2) with 8 base units (BUs) forming a network to cover the 2 locations in which cows from these studies were housed. All BUs were in direct line of sight to one BU nominated as the master unit, set up in optimal positions to reflect accurate positioning coordinates of the MUs assigned to each cow. Each cow was equipped with 1 MU, the number of each UWB unit recorded against cow number, and one battery. The UWB MUs were set to sample at 2Hz, twice per second, and send their position to the control unit connected to the computer where data was recorded and stored. UWB data recording began on the morning of day 6 and was scheduled to end on the morning of day 13 thus recording cow position by UWB continually for 7 days. Battery changes were scheduled at intervals throughout the trials in order to maintain continuity of data collection. Unfortunately in POC 1 failing battery power and recharging batteries became too frequent and the decision was made to end the trial prematurely at day 11. During POC 2 three different batteries were used to ensure power failure was avoided, 107
- Page 71 and 72: The interaction between parity and
- Page 73 and 74: individual oestrus was not signific
- Page 75 and 76: Table 2.4 The effects of the intera
- Page 77 and 78: (361 vs. 578 points, respectively,
- Page 79 and 80: oestrous expression with increasing
- Page 81 and 82: the blood (Sangsritavong et al., 20
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 3 - Single Nucleotide Polym
- Page 85 and 86: population owing to previous select
- Page 87 and 88: Table 3.1 Cont. Follicle Stimulatin
- Page 89 and 90: 3.2.4 Sequencing of DNA in the Labo
- Page 91 and 92: was achieved. PCR products were rem
- Page 93 and 94: 3.4 DISCUSSION The objectives of th
- Page 95 and 96: fertility and oestrous expression.
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 4 - Development of a Novel
- Page 99 and 100: In summary UWB seems a good option
- Page 101 and 102: Initial tests were carried out to i
- Page 103 and 104: Therefore this demonstrates that X
- Page 105 and 106: which is most important for achievi
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.9 Horizontal - Vertical Di
- Page 109 and 110: that UWB is matching the ‘truth
- Page 111 and 112: mounting cow. For example height ch
- Page 113 and 114: Backpack 1 st put on in AI stalls E
- Page 115 and 116: Cows’ behaviour was assessed at 5
- Page 117 and 118: or that the cows were in an area of
- Page 119 and 120: plane, but mostly in achieving high
- Page 121: Develop techniques for analysis of
- Page 125 and 126: and time of mount, duration of moun
- Page 127 and 128: observed matched with increases in
- Page 129 and 130: 5.3 RESULTS Results demonstrate pos
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 5.2 Graph showing mounting b
- Page 133 and 134: Table 5.1 Results from POC 2 showin
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5.3 Efficiency and accuracy o
- Page 137 and 138: oestrus and oestrus it is clear to
- Page 139 and 140: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 141 and 142: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 143 and 144: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 145 and 146: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 147 and 148: Activity Activity Activity Activity
- Page 149 and 150: Activity Activity Activity Activity
- Page 151 and 152: Activity Activity Activity Activity
- Page 153 and 154: 5.4 DISCUSSION The aim of this work
- Page 155 and 156: averaged 70% which was lower than t
- Page 157 and 158: when the cows lie down, especially
- Page 159 and 160: the level of oestrous activity was
- Page 161 and 162: technology larger herds must be mon
- Page 163 and 164: monitoring could also monitor non-l
- Page 165 and 166: antennae which could affect accurac
- Page 167 and 168: predispose cows to illness e.g. met
- Page 169 and 170: CHAPTER 6 - Overall Discussion & Co
- Page 171 and 172: oestrus, h 2 =0.27 (Lovendahl et al
<strong>and</strong> rum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>, as results from prelim<strong>in</strong>ary trials show (see Chapter<br />
4), mount<strong>in</strong>g behaviour was not <strong>in</strong>hibited.<br />
5.2.3 Experimental Design<br />
Figure 5.1 describes the general experimental design <strong>of</strong> the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
concept trials. On day 0 six <strong>cows</strong> were synchronised with CIDRs. Milk<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> activity moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g also commenced on day 0, throughout<br />
UWB record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g until 5 days after, <strong>to</strong> ensure collection <strong>of</strong><br />
data before, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> after <strong>oestrus</strong>. On the morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> day 6 UWB<br />
record<strong>in</strong>g began <strong>and</strong> the 6 <strong>cows</strong> <strong>to</strong> be synchronised were <strong>in</strong>jected with<br />
Estrumate. On day 7 CIDRs were removed, <strong>and</strong> then dur<strong>in</strong>g days 8, 9 <strong>and</strong><br />
10 <strong>cows</strong> displayed <strong>oestrus</strong>. UWB record<strong>in</strong>g ended on the morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> day 13<br />
(for POC 2 <strong>and</strong> 3; ended prematurely at day 11 for POC 1) after record<strong>in</strong>g<br />
UWB data for 24 hours for 7 days. Visual observation <strong>and</strong> CCTV record<strong>in</strong>g<br />
occurred simultaneously with UWB data collection (Figure 5.1).<br />
CIDR<br />
<strong>in</strong>sertion<br />
Estrumate<br />
i.m.<br />
<strong>in</strong>jection<br />
CIDR<br />
removal<br />
Figure 5.1 A diagram <strong>to</strong> show the experimental design <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> concept trials per day. Cows<br />
were synchronised with CIDRs at day 0. Milk sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> activity data collection also began at<br />
day 0 through <strong>to</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the trials at day 17. Estrumate <strong>in</strong>jection was adm<strong>in</strong>istered<br />
<strong>in</strong>tramuscularly at day 6, with UWB record<strong>in</strong>g also beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> day 6. On day 7<br />
CIDRs were removed which allowed for <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>to</strong> take place on the follow<strong>in</strong>g days. UWB<br />
record<strong>in</strong>g ended on the morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> day 13 record<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uously for 24 hours over 7 days (<strong>in</strong><br />
POC 2 <strong>and</strong> 3). UWB record<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g POC 1 ended prematurely on day 11.<br />
5.2.4 Synchronisation<br />
Six <strong>cows</strong> were selected for synchronisation <strong>and</strong> approved for use on trial by<br />
the Named Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Surgeon. On day 0 one Eazi-Breed CIDR device<br />
(InterAg, Hamil<strong>to</strong>n, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>; Cockburn Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Group, Leics, UK)<br />
was <strong>in</strong>serted per vag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>of</strong> each cow. The CIDR (controlled <strong>in</strong>ternal drug<br />
releas<strong>in</strong>g) device is an <strong>in</strong>tra-vag<strong>in</strong>al pessary conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1.38g progesterone<br />
106