novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows
novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows
accuracy, a 360° prism was used attached to a pole, along with a UWB MU and tracked by a surveyor’s total station (TCA2003, Leica Geosystems, Switzerland). The total station is a machine that measures the position of the prism by making angle and distance measurements using reflections of infrared light, to calculate the exact position coordinates of the prism. The position of the prism recorded via the total station, defining a ‘groundtruth’ position, was compared with the position recorded from the MU in reference to the BU network and relayed back to the computer in order to test the horizontal accuracy of static and kinematic positioning. Figure 4.5 shows the static test results and Figure 4.6 demonstrates the kinematic test results. Due to the different sampling rate between the two measurements (total station and UWB), these points cannot match each other one-to-one, but these figures demonstrate that the position calculated by the total station compares well with the UWB position in the horizontal, X and Y axis. The total station provides millimetre level accuracy which is treated as the true position, therefore when comparing the UWB position against the total station position; UWB achieved 2 to 3cm accuracy in the horizontal dimension. Figure 4.3 UWB mobile unit set up, connected to a 12 Volt battery Figure 4.4 Mobile unit and battery set up in backpack monitoring cow movement 86
Therefore this demonstrates that X and Y positioning is precise with few erroneous signals, and is more precise than Z positioning. Z is the most difficult axis to achieve accuracy due to the geometry of the BU transmitters. Therefore vertical positional accuracy of UWB was tested by equipping cows with backpacks and MUs (see Figure 4.4) and monitoring their behaviour, movement and position within a small network of BUs. Three cows were monitored in a controlled environment in a series of short tests lasting approximately 10 minutes with records made of the cows’ behaviour to compare with the UWB results. Legend Total Station UWB MU Test 1 UWB MU Test 2 Stationary Total Station Stationary UWB MU 3cm 3cm 27m Figure 4.5 Static test to compare UWB precision in horizontal axes 29m Figure 4.6 Kinematic tests to compare UWB precision in horizontal axes 87
- Page 51 and 52: indication for the optimal time to
- Page 53 and 54: calving), 3) pre-breeding heat date
- Page 55 and 56: 1.5.2 Physiological Changes Physiol
- Page 57 and 58: 1.5.2.3 Body and Milk Temperature T
- Page 59 and 60: physical activity and stage of the
- Page 61 and 62: caused by the general environment t
- Page 63 and 64: may be gained. This is because data
- Page 65 and 66: In summary the objective was to for
- Page 67 and 68: diet, with concentrates at milking.
- Page 69 and 70: oestrus was defined as 3 consecutiv
- Page 71 and 72: The interaction between parity and
- Page 73 and 74: individual oestrus was not signific
- Page 75 and 76: Table 2.4 The effects of the intera
- Page 77 and 78: (361 vs. 578 points, respectively,
- Page 79 and 80: oestrous expression with increasing
- Page 81 and 82: the blood (Sangsritavong et al., 20
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 3 - Single Nucleotide Polym
- Page 85 and 86: population owing to previous select
- Page 87 and 88: Table 3.1 Cont. Follicle Stimulatin
- Page 89 and 90: 3.2.4 Sequencing of DNA in the Labo
- Page 91 and 92: was achieved. PCR products were rem
- Page 93 and 94: 3.4 DISCUSSION The objectives of th
- Page 95 and 96: fertility and oestrous expression.
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 4 - Development of a Novel
- Page 99 and 100: In summary UWB seems a good option
- Page 101: Initial tests were carried out to i
- Page 105 and 106: which is most important for achievi
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.9 Horizontal - Vertical Di
- Page 109 and 110: that UWB is matching the ‘truth
- Page 111 and 112: mounting cow. For example height ch
- Page 113 and 114: Backpack 1 st put on in AI stalls E
- Page 115 and 116: Cows’ behaviour was assessed at 5
- Page 117 and 118: or that the cows were in an area of
- Page 119 and 120: plane, but mostly in achieving high
- Page 121 and 122: Develop techniques for analysis of
- Page 123 and 124: in elastic silicone moulded over a
- Page 125 and 126: and time of mount, duration of moun
- Page 127 and 128: observed matched with increases in
- Page 129 and 130: 5.3 RESULTS Results demonstrate pos
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 5.2 Graph showing mounting b
- Page 133 and 134: Table 5.1 Results from POC 2 showin
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5.3 Efficiency and accuracy o
- Page 137 and 138: oestrus and oestrus it is clear to
- Page 139 and 140: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 141 and 142: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 143 and 144: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 145 and 146: P4 Concentration, ng/ml P4 Concentr
- Page 147 and 148: Activity Activity Activity Activity
- Page 149 and 150: Activity Activity Activity Activity
- Page 151 and 152: Activity Activity Activity Activity
accuracy, a 360° prism was used attached <strong>to</strong> a pole, along with a UWB MU<br />
<strong>and</strong> tracked by a surveyor’s <strong>to</strong>tal station (TCA2003, Leica Geosystems,<br />
Switzerl<strong>and</strong>). The <strong>to</strong>tal station is a mach<strong>in</strong>e that measures the position <strong>of</strong><br />
the prism by mak<strong>in</strong>g angle <strong>and</strong> distance measurements us<strong>in</strong>g reflections <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>frared light, <strong>to</strong> calculate the exact position coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>of</strong> the prism. The<br />
position <strong>of</strong> the prism recorded via the <strong>to</strong>tal station, def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a ‘groundtruth’<br />
position, was compared with the position recorded from the MU <strong>in</strong><br />
reference <strong>to</strong> the BU network <strong>and</strong> relayed back <strong>to</strong> the computer <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong><br />
test the horizontal accuracy <strong>of</strong> static <strong>and</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ematic position<strong>in</strong>g. Figure 4.5<br />
shows the static test results <strong>and</strong> Figure 4.6 demonstrates the k<strong>in</strong>ematic<br />
test results. Due <strong>to</strong> the different sampl<strong>in</strong>g rate between the two<br />
measurements (<strong>to</strong>tal station <strong>and</strong> UWB), these po<strong>in</strong>ts cannot match each<br />
other one-<strong>to</strong>-one, but these figures demonstrate that the position<br />
calculated by the <strong>to</strong>tal station compares well with the UWB position <strong>in</strong> the<br />
horizontal, X <strong>and</strong> Y axis. The <strong>to</strong>tal station provides millimetre level<br />
accuracy which is treated as the true position, therefore when compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the UWB position aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>to</strong>tal station position; UWB achieved 2 <strong>to</strong> 3cm<br />
accuracy <strong>in</strong> the horizontal dimension.<br />
Figure 4.3 UWB mobile unit set up,<br />
connected <strong>to</strong> a 12 Volt battery<br />
Figure 4.4 Mobile unit <strong>and</strong> battery<br />
set up <strong>in</strong> backpack moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g cow<br />
movement<br />
86