Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ... Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Ratio scaled bench press (kg/kg) 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Pre-season * * Mid-season Post-season Forwards Backs * significant at p < 0.01 Figure 11: Mean ratio scaled Bench Press by position over the three test sessions 72
Pull ups 10 8 6 4 2 * * Forwards Backs 0 Pre-season Mid-season Post-season * significant at p < 0.01 Figure 12: Mean number of pull-ups by position over the three test sessions 73
- Page 33 and 34: Analysis of work-to-rest periods in
- Page 35 and 36: 2.4.1 Body Mass There has been a ma
- Page 37 and 38: Table I: Body Mass (kg) of female r
- Page 39 and 40: Table II: Stature (cm) of female ru
- Page 41 and 42: Table III: Comparison of 10m and 40
- Page 43 and 44: etween age groups (Durandt et al.,
- Page 45 and 46: Durandt et al., (2006) indicate tha
- Page 47 and 48: Table IV: Comparison of Vertical Ju
- Page 49 and 50: to allow accurate comparison (Duthi
- Page 51 and 52: 1988; Ueno, Watai, & Ishii, 1988).
- Page 53 and 54: staff with regards to selection and
- Page 55 and 56: male rugby players may be associate
- Page 57 and 58: Union. The players were sub-divided
- Page 59 and 60: Body mass Skinfolds (biceps, tricep
- Page 61 and 62: held at 90 degrees to the surface o
- Page 63 and 64: knees extended (straight), and bare
- Page 65 and 66: controlled manner to the center of
- Page 67 and 68: withdraw from the test if they are
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 4.1 INTRODUCTI
- Page 71 and 72: the descriptive analysis indicated
- Page 73 and 74: Sum of skinfolds (mm) 200 180 160 1
- Page 75 and 76: Percentage Body Fat (%) 40 35 30 25
- Page 77 and 78: Within forwards, there was a small
- Page 79 and 80: 10m speed (sec) 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6
- Page 81 and 82: 40m speed (sec) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 * * *
- Page 83: No difference was apparent within p
- Page 87 and 88: 50 40 * * * Forwards Backs Push-ups
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AN
- Page 91 and 92: Cup (Schick et al., 2006). Attentio
- Page 93 and 94: skinfold thickness throughout the s
- Page 95 and 96: likelihood of injury during a train
- Page 97 and 98: can be possibly attributed to a gre
- Page 99 and 100: provide a good measure of the upper
- Page 101 and 102: mid-season, which performed 12 and
- Page 103 and 104: A reasonably high aerobic fitness l
- Page 105 and 106: these two broad positional groups h
- Page 107 and 108: physical fitness, it may also be ac
- Page 109 and 110: The current study has described the
- Page 111 and 112: Baker, D. and Nance, S. (1999). The
- Page 113 and 114: Crewther, B.T., Gill, N., Weatherby
- Page 115 and 116: Ellis, L., Gastin, P., Lawrence, S.
- Page 117 and 118: Hrysomallis, C. (2010). Upper body
- Page 119 and 120: Maud, P.J. (1983). Physiological an
- Page 121 and 122: Rienzi, E., Reilly, T., and Malkin,
- Page 123 and 124: Spencer, M., Bishop, D., Dawson, B.
- Page 125 and 126: APPENDIX A PARTICIPATION INFORMATIO
- Page 127 and 128: APPENDIX B CONSENT FORM Faculty of
- Page 129 and 130: 3.SPEED AND ACCELARATION 10 m (sec)
- Page 131 and 132: Forwards Backs Vertical Jump (cm) T
Pull ups<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Forwards<br />
Backs<br />
0<br />
Pre-season<br />
Mid-season<br />
Post-season<br />
* significant at p < 0.01<br />
Figure 12: Mean number <strong>of</strong> pull-ups by position <strong>over</strong> the three test sessions<br />
73
Change language