Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.4.2 Stature<br />
There is a clear distinction in stature (standing height) between male forwards and backs at<br />
junior (Durandt et al., 2006) and pr<strong>of</strong>essional level (Duthie et al., 2003). Interestingly, a data<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> New Zealand Rugby Players between 1972 and 2004 shows, that forwards have<br />
become slightly shorter whereas backline <strong>players</strong> have become taller (Quarrie & Hopkins,<br />
2007). It has been speculated that the decrease in stature <strong>of</strong> the forwards coincides with the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> the law permitting lineout jumpers to be supported in the lineout as this law<br />
allows good lifters to <strong>over</strong>come slight disadvantages in the stature <strong>of</strong> the jumper.<br />
In contrast to male <strong>players</strong>, numerous studies have demonstrated that senior and school girl’s<br />
forwards and backs have similar stature (Table II) (Kirby & Reilly, 1993; Quarrie et al., 1995;<br />
Sedlock, Fitzgerald, & Knowlton, 1988). Recent literature has shown that both <strong>elite</strong> women’s<br />
<strong>rugby</strong> <strong>union</strong> forwards are significantly taller than backs (Schick et al., 2008). It would appear<br />
that <strong>players</strong> in the forwards need to be tall to contest aerial possession <strong>of</strong> the ball in line-outs.<br />
2.4.3 Sum <strong>of</strong> Skinfolds<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> anthropometric assessments <strong>of</strong> <strong>rugby</strong> <strong>players</strong> have involved quantifying the<br />
body fat levels (Duthie et al., 2003). The calculation <strong>of</strong> percentage body fat is problematic,<br />
due to limitations in establishing percentage body from estimates <strong>of</strong> body density and skinfold<br />
measurements (Martin, Ross, Drinkwater, & Clarys, 1985) and the measurement error <strong>of</strong><br />
different methods and prediction equations (Duthie et al., 2006a). Given these concerns, it is<br />
24