Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Analysis <strong>of</strong> work-to-rest periods in U-19 Australia male <strong>rugby</strong> <strong>players</strong> showed that forwards<br />
(1:1.4) maintained a higher work-to-rest ratio than backs (1:2.7) with the loose forwards<br />
(1:1.2) working more continuously than inside backs (1:3.6 ) (Deutsch et al., 1998). Similarly,<br />
McLean (1992) reported that most work-to-rest ratios during international match-play were in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 1:1 to 1:9 for backs and forwards combined which is the same with U-19<br />
Australian <strong>players</strong> when positions are combined. These are considerably higher than the<br />
estimated mean work-to-rest ratios <strong>of</strong> 1:7.4 and 1:21.8 reported for New Zealand Super 12<br />
forwards and backs respectively (Deutsch et al., 2007). The prolonged rest periods at the<br />
senior <strong>elite</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>rugby</strong> <strong>union</strong> reflects the increase number <strong>of</strong> stoppages due to injuries, goal<br />
kicking and stringent refereeing. This in contrast, to the junior level, in which rest periods are<br />
short and work rates are higher (Deutsch et al., 1998), which suggests a less structured,<br />
continuous style <strong>of</strong> <strong>rugby</strong> in U-19 level compared to senior level.<br />
2.3.3 Distance C<strong>over</strong>ed and Velocity<br />
Estimation on the distance c<strong>over</strong>ed during the course <strong>of</strong> a match indicates that backs c<strong>over</strong><br />
more distance than forwards (Deutsch et al., 1998; Roberts et al., 2008). The total distance<br />
c<strong>over</strong>ed by both forwards (5581m) and backs (6127m) during a 80 minute <strong>rugby</strong> match at the<br />
<strong>elite</strong> level (Roberts et al., 2008) is in line with U19 age group level <strong>of</strong> forwards (4240m) and<br />
backs (5640m) during a 70 min match (Deutsch et al., 1998). The difference in total distance<br />
traveled by backs and forwards is attributed to a greater walking distance by backs (2351 vs.<br />
1928 m) and as result <strong>of</strong> high intensity running (448 vs. 298m) (Roberts et al., 2008).<br />
Sprinting data show that outside backs (280 ± 185 m) sprint significantly greater total<br />
distances than inside backs (124 ± 78 m), tight forwards (144 ± 189 m ) and loose forwards<br />
21