25.12.2013 Views

AN ASSESSMENT OF WOREDA CAPACITY: THE CASE OF ...

AN ASSESSMENT OF WOREDA CAPACITY: THE CASE OF ...

AN ASSESSMENT OF WOREDA CAPACITY: THE CASE OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ewards for performance and of sanctions for non-performance are factors that deteriorates<br />

capacity building efforts (OECD, 2006; Farrell, 2007; World Bank, 2005; UNDP, 1997).<br />

2.2.2.5 Availability and Management of Resources<br />

A society‘s capacity to meet the needs of its members depends on the resources available to it,<br />

and largely on to how best those resources are utilized. Developing capacity with inadequate<br />

financial resources and physical infrastructure results in trained people and organizations without<br />

the budget and facilities to do their job. Available and coordinated resources for managing<br />

change, developing capacities, capital investment and recurrent costs are critical (UNDP, 1997).<br />

The resources available to the society are wide ranging and more or less tangible in nature.<br />

Accordingly, there are two types of resources that serve as an input to capacity development or<br />

capacity building.<br />

Tangible resources are mostly found at the bottom of organizational hierarchy, they are<br />

measurable, quantifiable, and visible and they can easily be grasped and worked with that<br />

comprises of material and financial resources, skills, organizational structures and systems,<br />

physical assets such as infrastructure, plant and machinery and natural resources. These may also<br />

include resources that can be described in structural terms or as tangible forms of information<br />

and analysis. Examples of this are organizational structures and systems, legal frameworks and<br />

policies, books, reports and the like (Lavergne and Saxby, 2001; Kaplan, 2000).<br />

Besides, there are wide ranges of less tangible but not less important dimensions of capacity that<br />

belongs to the top of organizational hierarchy and is invisible. They are observable only through<br />

the effects they have to the organizations and to the practitioners. They are ephemeral, transitory,<br />

not easily assessed or weighed. They constitutes skills, experience and creativity; social cohesion<br />

and social capital; values and motivations; habits and traditions; institutional culture and etc.<br />

These intangible dimensions of capacity are crucial as they determine how well the society uses<br />

the other resources at its disposal (Lavergne and Saxby, 2001; Kaplan, 2000).Hence, capacity<br />

development needs to embed both types of resources as they are equally important in developing<br />

capacity.<br />

Therefore, building effective local governance places a high emphasis on the prevailing<br />

environment, local ownership with political leadership and the prevailing political and<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!