25.12.2013 Views

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

293<br />

Petition as "very sensible" , the discussion that fol lowed its presentation<br />

as very "creditab le" , and Whyte 1 s opening speech as "worthy <strong>of</strong> the House<br />

<strong>of</strong> Commons 11 The periodical , however, ad vi sed against being too<br />

•<br />

fastidious about properly educated vaccinators .<br />

The principles <strong>of</strong> good vaccination are now condensed into<br />

one or two points such as the following :- choose a healthy<br />

child, vaccinate from arm to arm or at any rate with recent<br />

moist lymph , and make four distinct insertions <strong>of</strong> lymph.<br />

Any properly educated medical man is quite competent to carry<br />

out these principles , and it is not good policy, especially<br />

in a colony, to create a class <strong>of</strong> experts over a matter so<br />

simple. One good inspector will make the who le pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

in <strong>Tasmania</strong> efficient vaccinators.26<br />

As Hall pub licly denied on October 2, 1869 , that the certificates for<br />

competency in vaccination which were given by Crowther to certain students<br />

at the Hospital Medical School had any value in ensuring their emp loyment<br />

as pub lic vaccinators judged by Eng lish standards,2 7 the Lancet 's opinion<br />

revealed a new, modified, relaxed attitude at variance with Hall's,<br />

·proving that he laboured under immense difficulties in attempti?g to keep<br />

abreast <strong>of</strong> scientific and medical developments in Britain. Although his<br />

"Petition" was well received and an address to the Governor emb odying the<br />

main points carried by the House, nothing came <strong>of</strong> it. At the next<br />

session in September 1870, he tried again, still on his own , this time in<br />

the Legislative Council , insisting that, since the panic in the early part<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1869 had died away, vaccination, either by pub lic provision or by<br />

private Medical Practitioners, had almost ceased, not a single vaccination<br />

having been performed at the Hobarton, Launceston and Campb ell Town<br />

hospitals since July 1, 1869; moreover, as far as he knew1 only a single<br />

one. had been performed by a private practitioner in the who le colony;<br />

consequent ly, vaccine lymph was pract ically unprocurab le; in addition,<br />

since July 1, 1869, the population <strong>of</strong> 27,000 unvaccinated persons in the<br />

island had been increased by at least 3,000 more children, so that at<br />

least one-third <strong>of</strong> the population was unprepared against smallpox; <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the adj acent colonies , <strong>Tasmania</strong> alone did not emp loy paid pub lic<br />

vaccinators . 28<br />

2 7<br />

L:C.J ., 1870/48 .<br />

· ..<br />

However, his warning was disregarded. On May 1, 1871, and<br />

July 27, 1872, he repeated it in lo_ng articles to the Mercury , in which he<br />

26<br />

2 8<br />

Lancet, 1870, Vol . 1, p. 98.<br />

Mercury, Oct . 4, 1869.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!