25.12.2013 Views

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

283<br />

appointment ; that he should have felt compelled to write such a pleading<br />

letter to the Executive was a revealing reflection on the judgment and<br />

partisanship <strong>of</strong> that body; that he was overlooked on August 3 in favour<br />

<strong>of</strong> Benson, formerly Medical Superintendent <strong>of</strong> the Orphan Asylum, who had<br />

little interest in or knowledge <strong>of</strong> Pub lic Health, was even more so.<br />

Actually , Hal l was not the only one to recognize the need for<br />

quick , purposeful action. As nothing had been done <strong>of</strong>ficially by the<br />

Hobart Hospital Board, the House Surgeon , or other Honorary Medical Officers ,<br />

Crowther, 'very· praiseworthily 1 6 in the Mercury' s opinion , directed two <strong>of</strong><br />

his medical students, E.L. Crowther and G. Stokell, to attend the hospital<br />

daily from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. to vaccinate all and sundry. Vaccinations<br />

began on July 15 with lymph supplied from a private patient; on the same<br />

day, the Hospital Board authorized Turnley, the Resident Medical Officer ,<br />

to advertise that vaccinations would be performed daily at the hospital,<br />

although , oddly enough, no special provisions were made by him to carry them<br />

out. For the first two weeks the demand for vaccination by the students<br />

\vas not great , but after the Gazette announcement , it became enormous ;<br />

hmtlever, they contrived to keep a register, referring all doubtful cases<br />

to the House Surgeon for consideration.<br />

Meanwhile, on August 5 the Vaccination Bill was read in<br />

Parliament for the second time. As house to house visitation did,<br />

indeed, prove unpopular, the matter was referred to a Select Committee<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> Officer, Knight, Sharland, M. Miller and the Colonial Treasurer ;<br />

Doctors Smart , Crowther, Turnley, Agnew , Carns , Doughty and Hall gave<br />

evidence . On September 3 Miller brought up the Committee's report which<br />

concluded that the present law was altogether unsatisfactory, useless and<br />

inoperative; that a large and most dangerous proportion <strong>of</strong> the chi ldren<br />

in the colony was unprotected, and that no measure short <strong>of</strong> houṡe to<br />

house visitation could effectually secure the community from smallpox.<br />

In fact, the Committee <strong>of</strong> Enquiry, basing its report solely on the evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> medical men, entirely agreed with Hall, whose own evidence was , by far,<br />

the longest and most detailed, and constituted a concise survey <strong>of</strong><br />

vaccination in Britain, in Europe and in <strong>Tasmania</strong>.<br />

However, Hall's task to ensure the proper vaccination <strong>of</strong> all<br />

persons in the colony was not an easy one: in the community, even amongst<br />

the medical fraternity itself, there was , naturally enough , a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

knmvledge and misunderstanding . Hall, therefore , was obliged continuously<br />

6<br />

Mercury, Sept. 18 & Oct. 19, 1863 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!