25.12.2013 Views

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

199<br />

Yet, Hal l's article cone luded on a note <strong>of</strong> optimism and rej oi d ng ;<br />

found that the Zymo tic class <strong>of</strong> diseases , which was that most influenced<br />

by atmospheric and local impurit ies, had gradually but considerab ly<br />

diminished in Hobarton since 1853, when there were 123 deaths in this<br />

group, to 100 in 1856 , and only 84 in 1857.<br />

he<br />

This was an encouraging<br />

result for Municipal authorities and should spur them on to increased<br />

exertions in the sanitation <strong>of</strong> the city.<br />

In April, 1858, the Australian Medical Journal pub lished the<br />

fourth and concludi_ng part <strong>of</strong> Hall's artie 1 e 110n the Medical Topography<br />

and Vital Statistics <strong>of</strong> Hobarton, <strong>Tasmania</strong>, and its southern Sub -Districts<br />

for 1855."<br />

Although in this section Hall primarily wished to discuss<br />

the diseases prevalent in <strong>Tasmania</strong> in 1855, as he had previously intimated<br />

in Part · III , he, nevertheless, devoted the first half to refuting<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionally Bedford 's letter in the Aus tralian Medical Journal .<br />

Angrily, indignantly, but precisely, Hall attacked one by one Bedford's<br />

conunents and obj ections , excusing himself on the grounds that the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the subject , his own honour, and the position <strong>of</strong> the<br />

objector demanded that he do so.<br />

Actually, it was a devastating attack<br />

on the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism <strong>of</strong> a man who obvious ly had little acquaintance<br />

with the subt leties <strong>of</strong> statistical argument and their implications with<br />

respect to acceptab le standards <strong>of</strong> health and mortality.<br />

Dr Bedford seems to be quite unconscious that, when g1v1ng<br />

from his own selected thirteen years calculations , an<br />

annual mean rate <strong>of</strong> mortality for the Orphan School, <strong>of</strong><br />

rather above three per cent (31 per thousand) for children ,<br />

who for five years out <strong>of</strong> the thirteen were all upwards <strong>of</strong><br />

three years old; for the other/five, all above two years<br />

old; and for the last three . a rs , with one solitary<br />

exception 1 all more than one ' year old, that the rate is<br />

enormous , when compared with that which usually prevai ls in<br />

Europe, in children <strong>of</strong> a corresponding age, and still more<br />

disproportionate when compared with the ratio <strong>of</strong> mortality<br />

in children in <strong>Tasmania</strong>.<br />

According to his own analysis <strong>of</strong> deaths at the Orphan School, taken from<br />

the Hobart Town Registry, 271 children had died from 1841-1857 inclusive,<br />

on an average daily strength <strong>of</strong> 400 children, wpich is 4 per cent or<br />

40 per 1000<br />

a rate which I venture to point out is without para llel in<br />

any we ll conducted estab lishment in Europe.<br />

Even th is, Hall considered too favourab le a view, considering the ages<br />

<strong>of</strong> the children.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!