PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania
PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania
PDF (Whole thesis) - UTas ePrints - University of Tasmania
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
,...,.w •-•-• -•-• -- -- .. - ....... -- -• , _ _ _,,_ ,_, ___ ,. __ ....,.., , ,_.,.,_, _ _,_ ,.,, •• -· ·- ,_ .. , _..__,_ . .,.,.., •••- '"'"' ' •"• -•••· ·- · •••- --·<br />
192<br />
pub lic opini9n or more energy, persistence and courage, although his<br />
enemies probably gave it the less kindly name <strong>of</strong> blatant egotism.<br />
It was in this vein that Hall rep lied on December 1, 1857, to<br />
Bedford 's letter <strong>of</strong> August 27 concerning the Orphan Schools, which had<br />
been published in the October number <strong>of</strong> the Australian Medical Journal .<br />
Bedford, restrained and courteous , though surprised and obviously hurt<br />
by Hall's criticisms , contended that the statistics given by Hall<br />
referred to only twQ years and partly a third, instead <strong>of</strong> covering an<br />
extended period like thirteen years .<br />
The high mortality in the years<br />
1854-6, Bedford claimed, was due to two temporary causes, the admission<br />
<strong>of</strong> very young children , which was not customary and was now discontinue d,<br />
and two epidemics .<br />
Moreover , he denied that any widespread<br />
dissatisfaction with the mortality at the Orphan Schools existed, and<br />
declared himself in favour <strong>of</strong> open discussions on the matter.<br />
I am one <strong>of</strong> the last persons to wish that information as to<br />
pub lic institutions should be withheld. I consider the<br />
well doing and safety <strong>of</strong> the inmates depends upon the open<br />
manner in which their operations are conducted; but to form<br />
a correct opinion the public must have the whole facts , not<br />
partial facts and misinformed opinions. I submit the<br />
enclosed tables (thirteen years) to assist anyone who may<br />
wish to know the facts and, if necessary, to ameliorate the<br />
sad conditions Mr Hall says exists.<br />
Contrary to Hall's statements , Bedford insisted that diet and ventilation<br />
were not the cause <strong>of</strong> so many deaths, b u t the easy spread <strong>of</strong> disease<br />
amongst a large numb er <strong>of</strong> children confined closely together. 14<br />
To this , Hall replied scornfully and indignantly that Bedford' s<br />
figures for thirteen years only proved his point the more , that the<br />
.children died at the rate <strong>of</strong> 31 per 1000 .<br />
Why even on an average <strong>of</strong> 15 years in London, - at all<br />
ages , from the moment <strong>of</strong> birth to extreme old age - the<br />
rate has not been quite 25 per 1000 - though cholera,<br />
smallpox, and other diseases unknown here , had prevailed<br />
extensively. Why, heavy as was the mortality at all<br />
ages , within the city <strong>of</strong> Hobart Town , comparatively to<br />
London, in 1856 it only amounted to 28 1 / 2 per 1000 .<br />
What was far worse, the rate <strong>of</strong> mortality <strong>of</strong> Orphan School children ,<br />
compared with country children in <strong>Tasmania</strong> was, on an average <strong>of</strong> thirteen<br />
successive years , S to 7 1 / 2 times greater.<br />
Accusing Bedford <strong>of</strong><br />
''disgraceful parsimony" in doling out milk in tab l espoonfuls to<br />
"perishing children" , Hall called for an immediate enquiry by an<br />
14<br />
A.M.J., October 1857, pp . 306-308 .