25.12.2013 Views

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transport arrangements, harvest groups base daily loadings and harvesting schedules. Changes in farm<br />

estimates during the season <strong>of</strong>ten occur and will therefore affect many <strong>of</strong> those facets identified<br />

above.<br />

Traditionally, mills used a proportional re-estimating program to determine the amount <strong>of</strong> change in<br />

farm estimates. In its simplest form, this is the calculation <strong>of</strong> a ratio comparing the actual yield for an<br />

area <strong>of</strong> harvested cane against the original estimate for that same area and applying the calculated<br />

ratio to the remaining crop estimates for each farm.<br />

The sugar industry has been using GPS as a management tool to keep records <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong><br />

various vehicles for a number <strong>of</strong> years. The first commercial GPS vehicle tracking system developed<br />

in Australia was the GEOSTAT locomotive tracking system developed by Tully Sugar Limited and<br />

GS Corporation in 1993 (Fuelling and Wright 1997).<br />

Developments in harvest management systems have seen the mounting <strong>of</strong> GPS on harvesters to<br />

monitor where harvesters have worked. Various harvester monitoring systems are currently in use<br />

with the main components comprising data logger, GPS and modem.<br />

Mackay Sugar developed a harvester monitoring system during the 2005 and 2006 seasons. MTData<br />

tracking and data logging units form the basis for the harvester performance and tracking system. A<br />

GPS tracking device records the position <strong>of</strong> the harvester and stores it in a data logger awaiting<br />

transfer to a central web site. The MTData units include elevator on/<strong>of</strong>f and engine on/<strong>of</strong>f digital<br />

inputs to allow the status <strong>of</strong> the machine to be determined.<br />

Crossley and Dines (2004) undertook trials to integrate harvester tracking with a mill-based spatial<br />

harvest recording system during the 2002 and 2003 seasons in the NSW mills. The hardware was a<br />

dedicated system assembled by Transcom, and consisted <strong>of</strong> a data logger, GPS and a CDMA modem.<br />

The data recorded by these units consisted <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> positions <strong>of</strong> the harvester, and machine<br />

status at those times.<br />

Harvesters monitoring data was stored on the harvester for the day and uploaded to a central server<br />

each night. A customised GIS s<strong>of</strong>tware application called CHOMP (Centralised Harvest Operations<br />

Management Program) was used to interpret the areas cut and maintain the paddock harvest status<br />

from a map interface (Beattie and Crossley 2006). Figure 2.10 illustrates GPS harvester tracking in a<br />

NSW harvested field.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!