Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
120 21.6 52<br />
140 25.2 51<br />
*Assume 1.8m row width<br />
Table 2.9 shows the average breakdown <strong>of</strong> operations across a 14-hour harvesting day from eight<br />
harvesters in the Mackay region. These data show that on turning at the end <strong>of</strong> rows and waiting for<br />
the mill to supply bins can consume nearly as much time as actual cutting time.<br />
Table 2.9 Field efficiency for Australian harvesting (Sandell and Agnew, 2002)<br />
Operation Time % <strong>of</strong> Time<br />
(Hours:minutes)<br />
Cutting 6:15 45<br />
Turning 2:50 20<br />
Waiting for bins 2:42 20<br />
Rest 0:59 7<br />
Other Downtime 0:52 6<br />
Servicing 0:22 3<br />
Mallee System<br />
The dispersed nature <strong>of</strong> the crop will have a significant impact on field efficiency. The yields per km<br />
<strong>of</strong> row will be about 20 to 40 green tonnes. However, because the mallees are in narrow dispersed<br />
belts, the yield per paddock hectare will be less than 5 green tonne per hectare, and typically around 1<br />
green tonne per hectare. Therefore, the haul distance will vary from hundreds <strong>of</strong> metres to several<br />
kilometres, which will make the logistics <strong>of</strong> harvesting and infield transport critical to minimising the<br />
time lost by both harvesters and haulouts.<br />
Modelling as part <strong>of</strong> this project has illustrated that because the rows <strong>of</strong> mallees are typically long,<br />
and the harvester’s speed will be low, the 20% <strong>of</strong> time spent turning in sugar cane will be reduced to<br />
about 5% (see Section 7.3). With close coordination between the harvester and the haulouts to<br />
minimise waiting for bins, it appears possible that harvester utilisation in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> 70% - 80%<br />
may be achievable.<br />
It is a challenging objective to achieve such high levels <strong>of</strong> utilisation in the mallee crop configuration,<br />
with the dispersed crop and capital intensive harvesters and haulouts. One option under consideration<br />
is to use infield transport for short hauls (up to about 2 km) to short-term landings in the corner <strong>of</strong> the<br />
paddock, and maintain the ratio <strong>of</strong> two haulouts per harvester. This will ensure that all three machines<br />
are as fully utilised as possible, with the emphasis upon maintaining harvester utilisation.<br />
The paddock corner landings will in many cases not be accessible by conventional road transport<br />
prime movers, and it is proposed to establish road transport landings widely spaced across a district,<br />
59