Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

machine components and the crop. This will transfer as much of the sugar standing in the field to the mill, whilst minimising extraneous matter (EM) and dirt in the cane supply. Recent developments in harvester monitoring and performance have seen the mounting on harvesters of various system configurations, which incorporate sensors to allow the status of the machine to be determined. These systems typically monitor elevator on/off and engine on/off and incorporate GPS to allow tracking and harvester ‘state’ to be defined. Mallee System The Claas Xerion has an onboard tractor management system that not only controls implements but can monitor all tractor functions. The on board management system monitors the following: • Full machine monitoring • Area meter • Hour meter • Total fuel consumption • Fuel consumption per field • Fuel consumption per job • Job processing • Engine monitoring Hence, there is existing capability for measuring and monitoring a range of field and other variables affecting machine performance. In the current prototype, Biosystems Engineering has installed data logging capability and transducers to monitor oil pressures, rotational speeds and some oil flows to various components in the harvester head. The feed rate from the saw to the chipper is linked via programmable logic control to ground speed and chipper feed speed is linked to the speed of the chipper drum. It may be feasible in future harvesters to regulate ground speed according to the load on the chipper. Future harvesters and perhaps the haulouts, will be auto steered, to follow tree lines mapped at the time of crop establishment, or mapped by the harvester on first harvest. Continuous mass flow measurement should be possible at a point where the chipped biomass passes at high speed around a curve in the discharge chute, and this capability will assist with infield logistics and lead to yield mapping and improved growth monitoring and modelling. 2.4.3 Field Efficiency Field efficiency of harvesting equipment can be calculated as the percentage of total operating time that the machine is actually harvesting. Sugar System In the case of sugarcane harvesting, the target output is the steady-state operating speed and is primarily determined by crop conditions. The percentage of available time the harvester is achieving its target output is primarily determined by time lost: • turning at end of rows • waiting for haulouts to take the harvested crop from the harvester 57
• waiting for mill delivery of empty bins • servicing and repairs • moving between fields • “cutting in” to new fields where harvesting rate is slow because the harvester tows a reversing haulout directly behind it into the field • choking of material in the harvester Time lost turning obviously relates to both the time taken for the harvester and haulout to turn at the end of the row and achieve correct positioning to allow the harvesting process to re-commence. It is therefore effected by: • maneuverability of the harvester and haulouts • available space for this maneuvering (headland width) • length of row and crop size, therefore affecting the number of turns which must be executed in daily allocated cutting. Row length is outside the control of the harvesting contractor. Short rows decrease the efficiency of a harvesting operation significantly because turn time is fixed. That is, less time is spent cutting cane for each turn when row length is reduced. Time lost waiting for haulouts relates to haulout capacity, speed of travel to the unloading node, unloading time and return time to near the harvester. This is therefore effected by: • haulout speed, loaded and unloaded on both field headlands and formed roads • distance to the delivery point • unloading time at the delivery point Field efficiencies are an important measurement in the analysis of harvest cost and harvest transport systems. The Australian cane industry has developed methodologies for measuring field efficiency. These include electronic systems using on-board electronic measuring equipment, data loggers and GPS systems. The typical field efficiencies for various crop sizes are shown in Table 2.8. These data are aggregated from the Maryborough, Mackay and Burdekin regions. Benchmarking of Australian harvesting operations has been by undertaken by Sandell and Agnew (2002) and Willcox (2004). Table 2.8 shows the percentage of time actually spent cutting cane from the total daily operation from two seasons in the Maryborough, Mackay and Burdekin regions. This shows that on average a little over 50% of the time the machine is actually cutting. Table 2.8 Field efficiency for various crop sizes (Willcox, 2004) Crop Size Crop Size Field Efficiency t/ha t/km row* % 60 10.8 53 80 14.4 52 100 18.0 52 58
Page 1 and 2:
Sustainable Biomass Supply Chain fo
Page 3 and 4:
Foreword This report provides an as
Page 5 and 6:
include business development (new p
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgments The authors would l
Page 9 and 10:
4.1 Product Options and Supply Chai
Page 11 and 12:
Table 4.2 Assessment of current val
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 3.4 Tracked rigid self-prope
Page 15 and 16:
Executive Summary What the report i
Page 17 and 18:
• Biomass production potential of
Page 19 and 20:
• As the Industry expands, the mo
Page 21 and 22:
Harvesting, transport and storage s
Page 23 and 24:
Biomass processing, supply chain pl
Page 25 and 26:
Key barriers to biomass industries
Page 27 and 28:
Crop-Biomass Production Production
Page 29 and 30: Figure 1.1 The cropping and pasture
Page 31 and 32: Table 1.1 Mallee species used for p
Page 33 and 34: 1.1.4 Growth Cycle Mallee System Ma
Page 35 and 36: northern New South Wales (where it
Page 37 and 38: Almost 80% of the industry now cuts
Page 39 and 40: Bark has relatively high ash but as
Page 41 and 42: Carbon sinks Planting of mallees to
Page 43 and 44: Table 1.5(a) State Land area devote
Page 45 and 46: out the fluctuations in farm income
Page 47 and 48: Mallee system Most of the mallee bi
Page 49 and 50: inconclusive result may have been d
Page 51 and 52: For a sustainable woody crop indust
Page 53 and 54: changed significantly since they we
Page 55 and 56: Figure 2.2 Biosystems Engineering p
Page 57 and 58: Whole-of-crop harvesting represents
Page 59 and 60: During the last decade the harvesti
Page 61 and 62: single row, as this would improve t
Page 63 and 64: 2.2.2.2 Weight Sugar System The Aus
Page 65 and 66: Table 2.1 Harvester Comparison Tabl
Page 67 and 68: The quality of cut may be less impo
Page 69 and 70: ate than a 170 tonne/ha crop of sta
Page 71 and 72: Dry Leaf 6.1 - 3.5 17.0 58.9 53.2 T
Page 73 and 74: Bulk density will be a key consider
Page 75 and 76: Table 2.4 EM levels in cane supply
Page 77 and 78: L/T L/T 60 0.97 0.71 80 0.92 0.66 1
Page 79: Total 7.5-26 16.5 Mallee System The
Page 83 and 84: perhaps at 10 - 20 km intervals. Th
Page 85 and 86: transport arrangements, harvest gro
Page 87 and 88: contractors and growers, and the fa
Page 89 and 90: experience of the sugar industry wi
Page 91 and 92: Table 2.11 Alternative harvest paym
Page 93 and 94: onto the harvester. BR+F still send
Page 95 and 96: Repairs and maintenance 2.10 Capita
Page 97 and 98: Figure 2.14 and Table 2.14 describe
Page 99 and 100: Sichter et al. (2005)), harvest and
Page 101 and 102: Transport efficiencies may be possi
Page 103 and 104: 3. Transport and Storage Systems Tr
Page 105 and 106: same time, the potential problems o
Page 107 and 108: Figure 3.3 Articulated self-propell
Page 109 and 110: • The harvester will not have any
Page 111 and 112: Figure 3.7 Gross mass compared with
Page 113 and 114: external factors dramatically impac
Page 115 and 116: Figure 3.11 The effect of haulout t
Page 117 and 118: 3.3 Road Transport 3.3.1 Configurat
Page 119 and 120: Figure 3.15 shows an example of the
Page 121 and 122: Road distance one way < 20 km 70 km
Page 123 and 124: Haul distance is largely outside th
Page 125 and 126: 3.6 Recommendations The nature of t
Page 127 and 128: • The strategy offered lower tota
Page 129 and 130: sugarcane billets are such that wit
Page 131 and 132:
• Transfer the whole tree product
Page 133 and 134:
Figure 4.5(b) Energy balance of con
Page 135 and 136:
2010). Table 4.2 presents a summary
Page 137 and 138:
4.4.2 Activated charcoal Activated
Page 139 and 140:
Nett Product Value ($/t) $475.00 $
Page 141 and 142:
Table 4.9 presents an estimation of
Page 143 and 144:
• Oil from leaf @ $2/kg • Synth
Page 145 and 146:
• The mallee oil would be extract
Page 147 and 148:
5. Industry and Business Structures
Page 149 and 150:
is conducted into tariff levels on
Page 151 and 152:
Bx is % brix in first expressed jui
Page 153 and 154:
Hildebrand (2002) estimated that th
Page 155 and 156:
also has a flow on effect to the sp
Page 157 and 158:
Sugar Industry Illustrative Example
Page 159 and 160:
with super size multi-lift bins ove
Page 161 and 162:
farmer vs. harvester) is the next l
Page 163 and 164:
6. Supply Chain Planning and Manage
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 6.1 Building blocks of the s
Page 167 and 168:
weighed against the costs of operat
Page 169 and 170:
• There is close contact between
Page 171 and 172:
6.4 Planning, Management Tools and
Page 173 and 174:
• Harvest and transport logistics
Page 175 and 176:
interface. The system allows users
Page 177 and 178:
Case Study 6.2 - Model Application
Page 179 and 180:
Relationships between sectors and p
Page 181 and 182:
7. Supply Chain Modelling and Econo
Page 183 and 184:
It was assumed that there was a fif
Page 185 and 186:
Table 7.2 Scenario two capital equi
Page 187 and 188:
Table 7.4 Fuel burn rates harvester
Page 189 and 190:
Figure 7.5 Effect of capital equipm
Page 191 and 192:
Figure 7.7 Effect of annual tonnes
Page 193 and 194:
30 1.8 7.0 12.3 17.5 50 1.1 4.3 7.6
Page 195 and 196:
8. Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 197 and 198:
Biomass bulk density has a large im
Page 199 and 200:
Vehicles used for infield haulout w
Page 201 and 202:
This can be compared with harvest a
Page 203 and 204:
While diversification can add value
Page 205 and 206:
Appendix 1: Comparative Assessment
Page 207 and 208:
and transport conditions. Billet le
Page 209 and 210:
that cane production is the most pr
Page 211 and 212:
on sugar only, other proceeds (mola
Page 213 and 214:
References Agnew, J 2002. A Partici
Page 215 and 216:
Enecon 2001. Integrated Tree Proces
Page 217 and 218:
Keating, BA, Antony, G, Brennan, LE
Page 219 and 220:
Ridge, DR and Linedale, AL, 1997. T
Page 221:
Willcox, T, Hussey, B, Chapple, D a
show all

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?