Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mallee System<br />
Pour rate is a key performance indicator in the development <strong>of</strong> a mallee chipper harvester. System<br />
analysis (McCormack et al. 2009) indicates that the most efficient instantaneous pour rate for reliably<br />
harvesting mallee should exceed 50 green tonnes /hr.<br />
The FFI CRC project, with the current harvester, has a target instantaneous pour rate <strong>of</strong> more than 20<br />
green tonnes/hr. The target beyond the current project is between 60 to 80 green tonnes /hr with a<br />
subsequent prototype harvester. The prototype harvester in trials to date has achieved a maximum<br />
continuous pour rate <strong>of</strong> 35 green tonnes/hr in a mallee crop yielding about 12 green tonnes/km <strong>of</strong> row<br />
(about 35 green tonnes/ha). Performance in heavier crops demonstrated a similar decline to that<br />
illustrated in Figure 2.7 due primarily to the heavier trees overloading the chipper (due to lack <strong>of</strong><br />
power) and reducing the continuous performance <strong>of</strong> the harvester.<br />
In principle, higher pour rates would result in lower per tonne costs but with the restriction <strong>of</strong> a<br />
relatively low harvester speed, at some point the mallees will need to be so big that the over-the-row<br />
chipper harvesting method may become impractical. At this stage it is not possible to identify the<br />
limit <strong>of</strong> performance.<br />
2.3.3 Product bulk density<br />
The bulk density <strong>of</strong> the product produced is an important performance consideration for efficient<br />
transport.<br />
Sugar System<br />
The most critical crop factors affecting bulk density <strong>of</strong> the cane-trash mixture are stalk density, leaf<br />
and trash to cane ratios and leaf and trash characteristics.<br />
The ratio <strong>of</strong> trash and leaf to cane is generally accepted to be affected by variety, growing conditions<br />
and final crop yield. A given variety can display significantly different characteristics, depending on<br />
the environment in which it is grown.<br />
In an assessment <strong>of</strong> the transport logistics, the breakdown <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the total biomass is<br />
<strong>of</strong> critical importance, i.e. extraneous matter (EM) levels alone are <strong>of</strong> limited value unless the<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the EM are known. Extraneous matter is defined as any material other than clean<br />
billets that occurs within the homogenous mixture <strong>of</strong> harvested biomass that is processed at the mill.<br />
Available data on the composition <strong>of</strong> residues, with respect to fresh moisture content, are summarised<br />
in Table 2.2.<br />
Table 2.2 Cane supply composition (wet and dry matter basis)<br />
Component % by weight % by moisture % DM <strong>of</strong> total EM<br />
NSWSMC NSWSMC NSWSMC NSWSMC NSWSMC NSWSMC<br />
1999 2000 1999 2000 1999 2000<br />
Cane 80.2 71.5 - - - -<br />
Tops 3.6 - 78.6 84.6 7.7 10.6<br />
Green Leaf 10.1 28.5 66.9 67.9 33.4 36.2<br />
47