25.12.2013 Views

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

While bioenergy feedstock is a less demanding product than pulp wood chip in terms <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong><br />

chip, many <strong>of</strong> the chip quality issues arising from chipper design and maintenance also impact<br />

directly upon chipper efficiency, and operating the chipper accounts for a significant proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

the diesel used throughout the biomass supply chain (Wu et al, 2008).<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> cut by the chipper also impacts upon bulk density. At the extreme in terms <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

cutting, shredding <strong>of</strong> whole trees is commonly observed to produce a very low density product with a<br />

high proportion <strong>of</strong> long pieces, which also makes material handling more difficult. Within chippers,<br />

disc chippers do not process shrubby material and small whole trees as effectively as drum chippers<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the way in which the knives approach the biomass (whereas disc chipping is the preferred<br />

method in log chipping). Chipper knife-to-anvil clearance is another variable that affects both chip<br />

quality and material handling properties.<br />

2.3.2 Pour Rate<br />

Pour rate is an important performance measure in any harvesting system.<br />

Sugar System<br />

For sugarcane harvesting there are four different pour rate definitions commonly used. These include:<br />

Instantaneous pour rate: Instantaneous pour rate is defined as how fast cane flows through the<br />

machine and is measured in tonnes per hour. Instantaneous pour rate is taken as the product <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

size and harvester forward speed, equating to the average instantaneous processing rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

harvester. Instantaneous pour rate is difficult to measure and only used in research trials. The<br />

maximum instantaneous pour rate <strong>of</strong> a cane harvester is around 400 tonne/hr.<br />

Elevator pour rate: Elevator pour rate is the tonnes per hour delivered <strong>of</strong>f the end <strong>of</strong> the elevator<br />

while the machine is continuously harvesting. The elevator pour rate in the Australian sugar industry<br />

is around 100 to 150 tonne/hr in green cane.<br />

Delivery rate: Delivery rate is the tonnes delivered to the mill delivery point per harvesting hour. A<br />

clear distinction is made between elevator pour rate and delivery rate. Elevator pour rate is the<br />

instantaneous rate at which cane is leaving the elevator while the harvester is continuously cutting<br />

and is not the average delivery rate <strong>of</strong> the machine. For example, a harvester travelling at 7 km/hr in<br />

a 100 tonne/ha crop has an elevator pour rate <strong>of</strong> 105 tonne per harvesting hour. After turning,<br />

waiting and other delay time is accounted for, this operation might deliver cane to the receival point<br />

at 60 tonne per harvesting hour. This is the difference between elevator pour rate and delivery rate.<br />

The typical delivery rate in the Australian sugar industry is around 60-80 tonne/hr in green cane.<br />

Field efficiency: Field efficiency is the time spent harvesting divided by the total time spent on<br />

harvest activities. In the example above, with 105 tonne/hr elevator pour rate and a 60 tonne/hr<br />

delivery rate, field efficiency would be 57%<br />

Engine hour pour rate: Engine hour pour rate is defined as the tonnes processed per harvester<br />

engine operating hour and is not to be confused with instantaneous, elevator or delivery pour rate.<br />

This method <strong>of</strong> measurement does not account for servicing and repair time and other harvest<br />

activities occurring when the harvester is not operating. It is an <strong>of</strong>ten used comparison as engine<br />

hours are easily measured.<br />

A very high degree <strong>of</strong> variability can be expected in the field. Identical harvesters can have<br />

dramatically different harvesting rates under identical field conditions, depending on the operators<br />

priorities, time pressures etc. Figure 2.7 illustrates the delivery rate <strong>of</strong> a sugarcane harvester for<br />

various crop sizes. Even with the same operator and machine, harvesting rate is not solely dependent<br />

on crop size, as a 100 tonne/ha badly lodged cane can have a dramatically lower maximum harvesting<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!