Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Almost 80% <strong>of</strong> the industry now cuts green. There has also been significant move towards minimum<br />
tillage and controlled traffic to reduce compaction caused by traffic associated with harvester and<br />
haulout machinery. A major problem with compaction in the sugarcane cropping system has been due<br />
to mismatched row and wheel spacings. Traditionally the sugarcane crop has been grown on 1.5 m<br />
rows whereas harvesting and haulout equipment has a standard 1.85 m wheel spacing resulting in<br />
encroachment on cropped areas causing compaction (see Section 2.2.1).<br />
A key part <strong>of</strong> the farming system has been growing rotation crops such as legumes which is harvested<br />
or left unharvested. Residue is then mulched into the soil or sugarcane planted into the residue. This<br />
cropping system provides better-balanced biology and control <strong>of</strong> root pathogens, helps biologically<br />
fix nitrogen, reduces the need for fertilizer nitrogen and improves soil organic matter and cane yield.<br />
Sugar cane systems all rely on GPS guidance for precision planting and subsequent land management<br />
and harvesting. The planting machine leaves the field in a furrowed condition, the sett being in the<br />
bottom <strong>of</strong> the furrows covered by 50 to 100 mm <strong>of</strong> soil. Subsequent cultivation is designed to destroy<br />
young weeds and grass growth and gradually fill in the furrow as the cane stools develop so that by<br />
harvest time a flat surface or slight ridge along the length <strong>of</strong> the cane row facilitates harvesting.<br />
Block sizes are driven by field width and also equipment considerations such as boomspray and<br />
planting rigs, but also irrigation logistics<br />
1.2 Crop Components and Uses<br />
1.2.1 Crop Components<br />
Mallee System<br />
The conceptual biomass harvest and supply chain is based on principles described by Giles and<br />
Harris (2003) and the current development <strong>of</strong> a prototype harvester by the Future Farm Industries<br />
CRC and Biosystems Engineering is turning the concept into reality. The harvester is self-propelled,<br />
straddles a single row when operating and moves continuously along the row. All above ground<br />
biomass is collected and chipped by the harvester and delivered continuously into tractor drawn<br />
haulout bins and the haulouts transport the chipped biomass out <strong>of</strong> the paddock to a roadside landing.<br />
A short-term surge buffer at the landing, between the infield operations and the road transport stage,<br />
will not permit any sorting <strong>of</strong> the material, so the delivered product at the processing facility will be<br />
the green mixed whole-tree biomass.<br />
The chipped biomass in its unsorted state is a mixture <strong>of</strong> wood chip, leaf, and residues <strong>of</strong> assorted<br />
fines, bark and small twigs. The mixed material in chipped form is liable to decompose significantly<br />
over a period <strong>of</strong> about a week. It is preferable to sort the leaf and residues from the wood chip if the<br />
biomass is to be stored for more than a few days because clean chip can be stockpiled relatively<br />
easily in its ex-harvester form, whereas the foliage and finer materials must be dried prior to longterm<br />
storage. Decomposition <strong>of</strong> finer material will degrade the product, fungal spores from the<br />
decomposing material represent an OSH issue, and spontaneous combustion <strong>of</strong> stacks is also a<br />
significant risk.<br />
The proportions <strong>of</strong> wood, leaf and residues is about one third each but these values vary widely<br />
according to tree species and age at harvest. Biomass composition is more complex than for sugar<br />
cane as mallees may be harvested over a wide range <strong>of</strong> ages, or over a wide range <strong>of</strong> mallee sizes.<br />
Size (above ground biomass per mallee) is likely to be more important for harvest scheduling than<br />
14