Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e able to choose.<br />
Sugar Industry Mallee Woody Crop Differences/Contrasts Key Issues and Recommendations<br />
Processing, Planning, Economic and Market Considerations<br />
1. Strong commercial focus on<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable sugarcane production and<br />
sugar extraction.<br />
2. Pr<strong>of</strong>itability through sugar<br />
production is the key driver for all<br />
stakeholders<br />
3. Primary market is sugar production.<br />
More recent focus on alternative<br />
products and by-products has been on<br />
the back <strong>of</strong> an already viable sugar<br />
product base.<br />
4. Sugar price is determined by<br />
processor (miller and refiner) and<br />
apportioned to producer after transport<br />
costs paid. Price affected by domestic<br />
and international price (80% export)<br />
and exchange rate.<br />
5. Sugarcane is the only feedstock for<br />
sugar production in Australia.<br />
6. Sugar industry and company pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />
are directly linked to an assured cane<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> suitable quality and quantity.<br />
7. Fundamental research into<br />
sugarcane harvesting and transport<br />
systems has dwindled in recent years.<br />
Much innovation occurs within the mill<br />
area and producers/contractors. Formal<br />
research is increasingly focused on<br />
systems approach<br />
8. Cane payment is based on sugar<br />
price and recoverable sugar content.<br />
Based on aggregate production for mill<br />
area.<br />
Traditionally there has been a split<br />
between miller 1/3 and grower 2/3 - a<br />
relative payment system is in place to<br />
account for quality changes through<br />
season. Payment to the grower is based<br />
1. Focus on pr<strong>of</strong>itable wheat production.<br />
Mallee has generally been seen as an<br />
environmental service that must pay its<br />
way. More recently there has been<br />
increased emphasis upon the commercial<br />
value <strong>of</strong> biomass.<br />
2. Primary market is biomass for energy<br />
markets including pyrolysis bio-oil<br />
(precursor to transport fuel), fuel pellets,<br />
co-firing with coal, thermal energy (boiler<br />
fuel) and other products such as charcoal<br />
and eucalyptus oil.<br />
3. Biomass prices for electricity<br />
generation driven by renewable energy<br />
targets (20% by 2020), network power<br />
charges, competing technologies and<br />
renewable energy certificate rates.<br />
Uncertainty in future policy and pricing <strong>of</strong><br />
REC’s is a key issue.<br />
4. Energy Producers such as Verve Energy<br />
are actively developing renewable energy<br />
opportunities, especially wind and solar.<br />
5. Coal is the primary feedstock for<br />
electricity generation in Australia. The<br />
established infrastructure <strong>of</strong> coal-fired<br />
power stations and the economies <strong>of</strong> a<br />
large scale concentrated fuel resource<br />
gives coal a significant economic<br />
advantage over biomass. Demand for<br />
biomass for electricity generation is driven<br />
more by regulatory mechanisms and<br />
policies (REC’s) which are immature and<br />
subject to policy change. Biomass<br />
complements the energy company’s<br />
portfolio <strong>of</strong> renewable energy sources<br />
(wind, solar, geothermal) given that it is a<br />
base load generation system.<br />
6. Typically mallee will have the following<br />
1. The sugar industry has evolved to<br />
maximize pr<strong>of</strong>itability and sustainability<br />
from sugarcane production. Mallee plantings<br />
were initiated to control salinity.<br />
2. Sugar mills have developed sophisticated<br />
sugar extraction processing capability over<br />
many years. New by-products processing<br />
requirements are in many cases<br />
complementary to sugar extraction<br />
technologies. Sugar refineries focus on<br />
adding value to the product by preparing<br />
and packaging sugar for different market<br />
sectors. Electricity generators are not well<br />
suited to developing new market<br />
opportunities for Mallee. They are more akin<br />
to a sugar refinery that is single product (ie<br />
sugar) focused.<br />
3. The sugar value chain is well developed<br />
and has committed stakeholders who are<br />
fully dependent on one another.<br />
4. The bioenergy value chain is less<br />
developed and has competing supply<br />
products.<br />
5. The sugar industry processor (miller) and<br />
the bioenergy producer have power over the<br />
supply chain. The sugar miller has arguably a<br />
better understanding <strong>of</strong> the producer’s<br />
needs. Many sugar millers also have<br />
sugarcane growing operations which are<br />
used to manage supply risk.<br />
6. Energy markets will generally see the<br />
biomass supply as a commodity and have no<br />
interest in becoming involved in supply<br />
chain planning and management.<br />
7. In sugar industry the growing sector has<br />
some influence on price paid for cane<br />
(through their representing bodies<br />
(Canegrowers)) and in some regions (eg<br />
1. Greater incentive in sugar to integrate<br />
supply chain with key driver being enterprise<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Returns from Mallee production<br />
seen as secondary to core business <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
production and marginal so less incentive to<br />
optimize.<br />
2. Energy markets are less likely to be<br />
proactive in developing alternative resource<br />
streams to their existing sources. New<br />
businesses will need to develop to take up<br />
these other energy market opportunities.<br />
There are no other players in this space which<br />
are analogous to the sugar miller, with the<br />
possible exception <strong>of</strong> Delta Energy.<br />
3. Key barriers to biomass markets likely to<br />
include marginal economics under current<br />
policy settings; inadequate volumes in biomass<br />
production; lack <strong>of</strong> integrated supply chain;<br />
uncertainty in volume <strong>of</strong> resource available;<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> established market for mallee biomass;<br />
limited interest in biomass supply within<br />
agricultural sector and electricity generating<br />
sector.<br />
4. The economic viability <strong>of</strong> Mallee for<br />
bioenergy production better suited to thermal<br />
energy production and less to electricity<br />
generation given processing efficiencies.<br />
Consideration to be given to local markets at a<br />
local level, for example thermal energy for<br />
heating at abattoirs, hospitals and other<br />
demand points (replacement <strong>of</strong> LPG).<br />
5. New markets will be required for Mallee<br />
biomass. This could involve a business who<br />
pre-processes the biomass (analogous to a<br />
sugar mill) separating the various components<br />
(eg trash, leaves, chips) for separate<br />
processing <strong>of</strong> oil, charcoal, bio-oil, electricity<br />
generation (analogous to the sugar refinery).<br />
187