Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

incorporate harvested mallee as a feedstock will be important pre-cursors for the technologies for a larger scale industry. As the Industry expands, the most significant potential markets will probably involve emerging technologies such as liquid fuels via pyrolysis. On the basis of current information, this market is seen as offering good returns, with the technology being appropriate for major regional centres, thus managing transport costs. Initial processing and oil extraction would be undertaken at nodal points, with value added product forwarded to the major centres. Whilst co-firing of coal fired power stations with mallee is potentially a very large market which could nominally consume the entire projected annual harvest, the location of coal fired power stations relative to mallee production areas means that co-firing will not be a major market for the bulk of the projected industry, because of transport costs. Products such as metallurgical charcoal and bio-char are potentially significant products, but of lower value, and unlikely to drive major industry expansion unless costs of harvest and transport were significantly reduced relative to projected levels. The development of a long term viable project can be driven by actively targeting small but potentially highly profitable niche markets in the short term and supporting these to further develop the technology envisaged for a larger scale industry. Apart from local thermal and electricity, higher value uses of mallee will require significant transport and some storage. The leaf and twig material are of lower density and deteriorate more rapidly than chipped wood material. They are of some potential value for oil extraction and after oil extraction this material is of similar value to woodchip for many potential uses. A high level of extraction of leaf material is desirable to maximise the value of woodchip for a number of potential uses. Using current or envisaged technology, the product off the harvester would not meet envisaged standards for many applications because of the mix of components. A potential strategy for expanding the industry could comprise: • Harvest the mallee trees utilising short haul transport concepts to transport the product 20-30 km from farms to nodal processing sites. • The nodal processing sites would have the appropriate re-locatable or semi-mobile equipment to separate leaf, twig and bark material from the chipped wood. • The woodchip would be transported directly via rail or road to appropriate processing facilities such as synthetic diesel production. • Mallee oil would be extracted utilising relatively low technology steam extraction at the nodal processing site. The extracted leaf could be sun-dried utilising low tech strategies such as shallow bed drying. The dried leaf could then be utilised for a number of potential uses, including baling for lower cost of transport to higher value potential uses and local use for local thermal or electricity production. Preliminary analysis of potential mallee products, including the feedstock component, product value and extraction costs, suggests that fresh weight values in the order of $100/green tonne could be achievable for large scale oil extraction combined with metallurgical charcoal and synthesised diesel. Similarly for a limited local industry comprising oil extraction combined with local electricity and thermal heat, fresh weight tree value could be in the order of $185/green tonne. These costs do not include a processing profit margin. 177

This can be compared with harvest and haul costs (excluding contractor profits) of around $45/green tonne (based on small scale production of 15,000 tonnes/yr, low harvester performance, pour rates of 30tonnes/hr, and a 100km haul) and $28/green tonne (based on large scale production (145,000tonnes/yr and high harvester performance, pour rate of 50tonnes/hr, and a 100km haul). Stumpage charges for the grower to recover biomass production cost would need to be added and could vary from $15-$30/green tonne. Apart from continuing development of harvesting technology, the components in a model of a full scale industry must be further developed. This will involve further analysis of potential product streams and the opportunities for maximising the synergies from the production of different products. Whilst further development of the overall industry model is required, a number of enabling technologies will almost certainly be required to be developed and optimised. It is probable that the technologies will include: • Efficient separation of “ex harvester” product into components, primarily leaf, twig and bark from the woodchip component. • Efficient steam extraction of the leaf and twig components, versus the current strategies of whole tree product. This will be essential to reduce the energy consumption and cost associated with oil extraction. • Efficient drying and densification of leaf and twig material after oil extraction to maximise transport densities and minimise transport costs. • Automated combustion systems for mallee chip and densified leaf product. In addition to these basic components, it is essential that work continue on the “Big Picture” components of the potential industry, including gasification/pyrolysis for the potential production of liquid fuels. Industry and Business Structures Chapter 5 has outlined the various industry and business structures in the sugar industry. Organisational structures and how costs and profits are divided across the mallee biomass supply chain will be crucial to provide incentives for efficiency improvement. Within the sugar industry costs (e.g. harvesting) are generally averaged across participants and individuals are not always aware of their costs or rewarded for efficiency. The sugar industry has recognised that streamlining the value chain is essential to ensure optimal mill throughput and a reliable cane supply, and that sustainability will be improved by identifying and targeting real costs. Other mechanisms to ensure supply reliability have included long term contracts and performance based incentives. Harvest and transport represents 30% of costs within the sugar value chain and there are significant inefficiencies which are principally a result of divided responsibilities between the grower and the miller. The cost of harvesting is the grower’s responsibility while the cost of transport is the responsibility of the mill. Across some regions within the sugar industry a reduction in the number of harvesting operations and optimising existing groups are demonstrating some benefits. Institutional and regulatory arrangements have had a profound impact on development of the sugar supply chain. In particular, development of a cane payment formula that accounts for quality of cane delivered has been significant in improving supply chain performance. Pricing arrangements are now negotiated regionally based on an industry framework. In the mallee industry, particularly when there are multiple products and markets, appropriate payment mechanisms need to be considered. 178

incorporate harvested mallee as a feedstock will be important pre-cursors for the technologies for a<br />

larger scale industry.<br />

As the Industry expands, the most significant potential markets will probably involve emerging<br />

technologies such as liquid fuels via pyrolysis. On the basis <strong>of</strong> current information, this market is seen<br />

as <strong>of</strong>fering good returns, with the technology being appropriate for major regional centres, thus<br />

managing transport costs. Initial processing and oil extraction would be undertaken at nodal points,<br />

with value added product forwarded to the major centres.<br />

Whilst co-firing <strong>of</strong> coal fired power stations with mallee is potentially a very large market which<br />

could nominally consume the entire projected annual harvest, the location <strong>of</strong> coal fired power stations<br />

relative to mallee production areas means that co-firing will not be a major market for the bulk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

projected industry, because <strong>of</strong> transport costs.<br />

Products such as metallurgical charcoal and bio-char are potentially significant products, but <strong>of</strong> lower<br />

value, and unlikely to drive major industry expansion unless costs <strong>of</strong> harvest and transport were<br />

significantly reduced relative to projected levels.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> a long term viable project can be driven by actively targeting small but<br />

potentially highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable niche markets in the short term and supporting these to further develop<br />

the technology envisaged for a larger scale industry.<br />

Apart from local thermal and electricity, higher value uses <strong>of</strong> mallee will require significant transport<br />

and some storage. The leaf and twig material are <strong>of</strong> lower density and deteriorate more rapidly than<br />

chipped wood material. They are <strong>of</strong> some potential value for oil extraction and after oil extraction this<br />

material is <strong>of</strong> similar value to woodchip for many potential uses.<br />

A high level <strong>of</strong> extraction <strong>of</strong> leaf material is desirable to maximise the value <strong>of</strong> woodchip for a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> potential uses. Using current or envisaged technology, the product <strong>of</strong>f the harvester would<br />

not meet envisaged standards for many applications because <strong>of</strong> the mix <strong>of</strong> components.<br />

A potential strategy for expanding the industry could comprise:<br />

• Harvest the mallee trees utilising short haul transport concepts to transport the product 20-30<br />

km from farms to nodal processing sites.<br />

• The nodal processing sites would have the appropriate re-locatable or semi-mobile equipment<br />

to separate leaf, twig and bark material from the chipped wood.<br />

• The woodchip would be transported directly via rail or road to appropriate processing<br />

facilities such as synthetic diesel production.<br />

• Mallee oil would be extracted utilising relatively low technology steam extraction at the nodal<br />

processing site. The extracted leaf could be sun-dried utilising low tech strategies such as<br />

shallow bed drying. The dried leaf could then be utilised for a number <strong>of</strong> potential uses,<br />

including baling for lower cost <strong>of</strong> transport to higher value potential uses and local use for<br />

local thermal or electricity production.<br />

Preliminary analysis <strong>of</strong> potential mallee products, including the feedstock component, product value<br />

and extraction costs, suggests that fresh weight values in the order <strong>of</strong> $100/green tonne could be<br />

achievable for large scale oil extraction combined with metallurgical charcoal and synthesised diesel.<br />

Similarly for a limited local industry comprising oil extraction combined with local electricity and<br />

thermal heat, fresh weight tree value could be in the order <strong>of</strong> $185/green tonne. These costs do not<br />

include a processing pr<strong>of</strong>it margin.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!