Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A sustainable mallee woody crop industry will require optimised farming and delivery systems. This<br />
may comprise mallee biomass supply on its own, or mallee integrated with other farming systems.<br />
Optimum planting and management arrangements will differ markedly for each scenario. Competition<br />
for soil moisture is important and will depend on local climate and soils. Row layout, tree spacing and<br />
age at harvest will impact harvesting efficiency. Since harvesting and transport will be the major cost<br />
in mallee supply to the processor, designing the layout to maximise harvest efficiency and minimise<br />
cost is <strong>of</strong> critical import.<br />
Considerable capital has already been expended on establishing more than 13 000 Ha <strong>of</strong> mallee in<br />
Western Australia. Many <strong>of</strong> these alley plantings will be too old to harvest economically with a<br />
chipper harvester and alternative systems (e.g. feller-buncher) will be needed to control competition<br />
with existing cereal crops.<br />
It is likely that biomass supply to a processor will comprise block plantings close to the processor,<br />
supplemented by existing feedstock from dispersed alley plantings where appropriate. Block<br />
cultivation may comprise closely spaced alleys (10-30m) on marginal land close to the processor.<br />
Spacing will be site specific and determined by soil moisture competition and yield. Harvest and<br />
transport logistics must be considered in determining layouts. Harvesting efficiency will be improved<br />
when the concentration <strong>of</strong> biomass per metre <strong>of</strong> row is maximised and distance between belts is<br />
minimised.<br />
Where mallee planting is not intended for biomass removal, consideration will need to be given to<br />
protocols for carbon credits.<br />
Mallee planting provides vegetative biodiversity in a wheat monoculture and the collateral benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
this biodiversity and associated environmental dividend needs to be quantified.<br />
Improvements to the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the mallee farming systems will require further<br />
R&D to improve biomass yield, tree presentation for cost effective harvesting and better integration<br />
with other farming systems. Farming systems need to be implemented that not only enhance economic<br />
and environmental performance in the farming sector, but also match value chain requirements for<br />
overall efficiency.<br />
Harvesting Systems<br />
Chapter 2 demonstrated that sugarcane harvesting and transport systems have many similarities with<br />
mallee systems. In particular whole-<strong>of</strong>-crop sugarcane harvesting with all material (cane and trash)<br />
transported to the sugar mill has close synergies with mallee harvesting system.<br />
The sugar industry has shown the importance <strong>of</strong> considering whole-<strong>of</strong>-system performance to ensure<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the supply chain work efficiently as an integrated system. The prototype mallee<br />
harvester provides an opportunity to evaluate machine performance and assess critical parameters<br />
across the supply chain.<br />
The current harvester performs the basic functions <strong>of</strong> gathering, severing stems at ground level,<br />
feeding all the woody and leafy biomass through a chipper system and delivering the chipped product<br />
into infield transport. There is no debarking or separation <strong>of</strong> leafy biomass from woody biomass<br />
during the process. The current system is limited by available power which impacts pour rate, a<br />
critical factor in the delivered biomass cost and future prototypes will need to address this.<br />
Manoeuvrability, mobility and associated soil compaction issues will need to be considered in the<br />
selection <strong>of</strong> the tracked or wheeled configuration harvester.<br />
The prototype harvester, in trials to date, has achieved a pour rate <strong>of</strong> up to 38t/hr for a short period. A<br />
continuous machine pour rate greater than 50 t/hr will be required for a viable harvesting system.<br />
173