25.12.2013 Views

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A sustainable mallee woody crop industry will require optimised farming and delivery systems. This<br />

may comprise mallee biomass supply on its own, or mallee integrated with other farming systems.<br />

Optimum planting and management arrangements will differ markedly for each scenario. Competition<br />

for soil moisture is important and will depend on local climate and soils. Row layout, tree spacing and<br />

age at harvest will impact harvesting efficiency. Since harvesting and transport will be the major cost<br />

in mallee supply to the processor, designing the layout to maximise harvest efficiency and minimise<br />

cost is <strong>of</strong> critical import.<br />

Considerable capital has already been expended on establishing more than 13 000 Ha <strong>of</strong> mallee in<br />

Western Australia. Many <strong>of</strong> these alley plantings will be too old to harvest economically with a<br />

chipper harvester and alternative systems (e.g. feller-buncher) will be needed to control competition<br />

with existing cereal crops.<br />

It is likely that biomass supply to a processor will comprise block plantings close to the processor,<br />

supplemented by existing feedstock from dispersed alley plantings where appropriate. Block<br />

cultivation may comprise closely spaced alleys (10-30m) on marginal land close to the processor.<br />

Spacing will be site specific and determined by soil moisture competition and yield. Harvest and<br />

transport logistics must be considered in determining layouts. Harvesting efficiency will be improved<br />

when the concentration <strong>of</strong> biomass per metre <strong>of</strong> row is maximised and distance between belts is<br />

minimised.<br />

Where mallee planting is not intended for biomass removal, consideration will need to be given to<br />

protocols for carbon credits.<br />

Mallee planting provides vegetative biodiversity in a wheat monoculture and the collateral benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

this biodiversity and associated environmental dividend needs to be quantified.<br />

Improvements to the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the mallee farming systems will require further<br />

R&D to improve biomass yield, tree presentation for cost effective harvesting and better integration<br />

with other farming systems. Farming systems need to be implemented that not only enhance economic<br />

and environmental performance in the farming sector, but also match value chain requirements for<br />

overall efficiency.<br />

Harvesting Systems<br />

Chapter 2 demonstrated that sugarcane harvesting and transport systems have many similarities with<br />

mallee systems. In particular whole-<strong>of</strong>-crop sugarcane harvesting with all material (cane and trash)<br />

transported to the sugar mill has close synergies with mallee harvesting system.<br />

The sugar industry has shown the importance <strong>of</strong> considering whole-<strong>of</strong>-system performance to ensure<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the supply chain work efficiently as an integrated system. The prototype mallee<br />

harvester provides an opportunity to evaluate machine performance and assess critical parameters<br />

across the supply chain.<br />

The current harvester performs the basic functions <strong>of</strong> gathering, severing stems at ground level,<br />

feeding all the woody and leafy biomass through a chipper system and delivering the chipped product<br />

into infield transport. There is no debarking or separation <strong>of</strong> leafy biomass from woody biomass<br />

during the process. The current system is limited by available power which impacts pour rate, a<br />

critical factor in the delivered biomass cost and future prototypes will need to address this.<br />

Manoeuvrability, mobility and associated soil compaction issues will need to be considered in the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> the tracked or wheeled configuration harvester.<br />

The prototype harvester, in trials to date, has achieved a pour rate <strong>of</strong> up to 38t/hr for a short period. A<br />

continuous machine pour rate greater than 50 t/hr will be required for a viable harvesting system.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!