Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• There is close contact between nurseries/planters and farmers, however the increasing numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> mallee being bulldozed out in WA indicates disengagement by farmers.<br />
• Harvesting contractors don’t exist yet however harvesting technologies are rapidly developing<br />
and will require an appropriate business model.<br />
• Road transport operators are not engaged as yet, however failure to vertically integrate<br />
harvesters and road transport will impact pr<strong>of</strong>it margins.<br />
• The concept <strong>of</strong> preliminary biomass processing, or upgrading, has little currency as yet. Most<br />
people see a large biomass conversion industry (eg power generator) being the sole processor.<br />
Such large industries have an expectation that supply will be just in time, externally managed<br />
with minimal stockpile requirements for the processor. There is a perception that preliminary<br />
processors would impose a risk for large scale processors, because if farmers extend their<br />
influence into the preliminary processing they will be in a position to sell partially upgraded<br />
material to other markets.<br />
• Large energy processors are currently the most prominent biomass conversion industries. They<br />
are large organisations and are generally reluctant to get too involved with farmers and supply<br />
chains.<br />
• It is debatable whether the scale at which groups 1-5 are able to operate now or in the near<br />
future is compatible with the minimum scale at which large biomass processing corporations<br />
can function. Consideration has to be given to build capacity in groups 1-5 by developing new<br />
small industries in 6, and so developing the capacity to underpin large industries like electricity<br />
generators in the longer term.<br />
• Consumers range between people connected to the electricity grid to a variety <strong>of</strong> potential<br />
customers who are probably largely unaware <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> mallees. The most significant<br />
role here is possibly through political routes and recent successes in raising the awareness <strong>of</strong><br />
bioenergy options.<br />
• There is a range <strong>of</strong> small R&D organisations, public and private, investigating new harvesting<br />
technologies, farming systems and near-commercial biomass conversion processes, such as<br />
various forms <strong>of</strong> pyrolysis to produce syngas or bio-oil. These groups are likely to become<br />
dominant in uses and markets for biomass within 10-15 years, though some talk <strong>of</strong> being ready<br />
for commercialisation now.<br />
• Private sector industry groups are showing an interest in developing and operating components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the supply chain and recognise opportunity for pr<strong>of</strong>itable ventures as the market develops.<br />
There is at this point very little collective vision, trust and planning in the mallee biomass industry<br />
and the linkages described above are generally extended only as far as each group chooses to serve<br />
their own immediate needs. This is inevitable as there is no overarching responsible entity, from<br />
which might develop a collective vision in the absence <strong>of</strong> an actual industry.<br />
146