Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Because of the extraction of the oil component, an alternative boutique use of leaf and twig could be as feedstock for compost however additional agricultural waste would probably be required to achieve correct component ratios. Some synergies may exist with abattoirs with respect to the production of high value compost however the concentrations of heavy metals in the leaf material and or extracted liquid could be an issue. Table 4.3 presents data on the production of mallee oil. The extraction costs are nominal based on the energy requirement for the extraction process on gas costs only. In an industrial process, energy would be supplied from combustion of used product, with the nominal saving being absorbed by fixed and variable costs associated with the process. Table 4.3 Value of feedstock components for Mallee Oil for boutique and industrial use Oil Value ($/kg) $10 $2 Tree component leaf & twig whole tree leaf & twig whole tree Extraction cost ($/kg) $ 0.84 $ 1.08 $ 0.84 $ 1.08 Product Value ($/kg) $9.16 $8.92 $1.16 $0.92 Product yield (kg/gt) 18.0 10.5 18.0 10.5 Value/gt freshweight at $ 164.81 $ 93.69 $ 20.81 $ 9.69 factory Residual product Wet leaf & twig + separated woodchip Wet leaf & twig & woodchip Wet leaf & twig + separated woodchip Wet leaf & twig & woodchip Residual Product Value * 100% of woodchip * 65% of leaf & twig * 90% of woodchip * 65% of leaf & twig * 100% of woodchip * 65% of leaf & twig * 90% of woodchip * 65% of leaf & twig Table 4.3 indicates that: • For the boutique market with an oil price of $10/kg ex-factory, feedstock value at the factory is in the order of $165/green tonne for leaf and twig components of the tree if pre-separated, or $94/green tonne for the whole tree if the entire harvested product is processes. • The value of leaf and twig based on industrial oil prices are $21/green tonne for leaf and twig if separated prior to the process or $10/green tonne if the whole tree is run through the extraction process. The increased thermal requirement to process the whole tree instead of leaf (and twigs) only equates to approximately $0.24/kg of oil. Whilst this is barely significant in the case of boutique oil, it is highly significant in the economics of industrial oil. These costs indicate that oil extraction for industrial use is not a viable “stand-alone” use of harvested malle in a large scale industry; however oil extraction from the separated leaf and twig material can potentially give an additional income stream. After oil extraction has been undertaken: • If pre-separated, the full value of the woodchip would still be available, however if the woodchip was subjected to steam extraction, some degradation would have occurred, along with an increase in moisture content; • The reduced alkali levels in leaf and twig material can be anticipated to reduce potential problems associated with combustion of these products, thus potentially increasing their value; • Work at Curtin University ( http://asdi.curtin.edu.au/csrp/projects/4c2.html) indicates that after oil extraction, leaf and twig material actually convert into a higher value metallurgical charcoal than wood. • To capitalise on this value, it would be necessary to efficiently re-dry and process the material. The energy required to achieve this would be equivalent to combusting approximately 35% of the material. 113
4.4.2 Activated charcoal Activated charcoal is used for water purification and some minerals processing. It is a high value product, however the market is limited. Typically activated charcoal production equates to approximately 4% of initial feedstock mass. To meet various technical requirements the feedstock must be “clean” woodchip. The process is highly exothermic. A “process cost” of $0.50/kg of final product is assumed for capital and operating costs of the facility required to perform the process, however significant energy is released in the process, with this potentially being captured as thermal energy or chemical energy (syn gas or bio-oil). Table 4.4 indicates that the value of feedstock for the production of activated charcoal would then be in the order of $100/green tonne for clean woodchip or $41/green tonne for chopped whole tree product, which would have to be separated into components prior to use. Table 4.4 Value of feedstock components for activated charcoal. Product Value ($/kg) $ 3.00 Component Used Woodchip Extraction cost ($/kg) $ 0.50 Product Value ($/kg) $2.50 Product yield (% of freshweight) 4.1% Value/t freshweight separated woodchip $ 102.60 Value/t freshweight whole tree $ 41.04 Residual and co-products Heat syngas and bio-crude. Co-Product value App 80% of initial energy content as heat and combustables/feedstock. The production of activated charcoal results in significant heat production and production of syngas and bio-crude, with a significant proportion of the energy in the initial feedstock being liberated in these components. After the production of activated charcoal, significant further value can be extracted from the feedstock. 4.4.3 Metallurgical charcoal Metallurgical Charcoal is used in a number of processes and is formed by stopping the reduction process earlier than for activated charcoal, which is actually produced in a two stage process. The recovered mass of metallurgical charcoal is typically around 21% of woodchip freshweight (at 42% MC), and leaf and twig would be considered to be of limited value, however as noted above the research at Curtin University indicates that extracted leaf and twig material has enhanced value as a feedstock for metallurgical charcoal because of the properties of the charcoal produced. Table 4.5 indicates that at typical industrial prices for metallurgical charcoal of around $200/tonne. It is assumed that the process cost will be in the order of $25/tonne final product. Whilst woodchip is the assumed feedstock, some price premium could possibly also be achieved by the production of block charcoal. 114
- Page 85 and 86: transport arrangements, harvest gro
- Page 87 and 88: contractors and growers, and the fa
- Page 89 and 90: experience of the sugar industry wi
- Page 91 and 92: Table 2.11 Alternative harvest paym
- Page 93 and 94: onto the harvester. BR+F still send
- Page 95 and 96: Repairs and maintenance 2.10 Capita
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 2.14 and Table 2.14 describe
- Page 99 and 100: Sichter et al. (2005)), harvest and
- Page 101 and 102: Transport efficiencies may be possi
- Page 103 and 104: 3. Transport and Storage Systems Tr
- Page 105 and 106: same time, the potential problems o
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 3.3 Articulated self-propell
- Page 109 and 110: • The harvester will not have any
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 3.7 Gross mass compared with
- Page 113 and 114: external factors dramatically impac
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 3.11 The effect of haulout t
- Page 117 and 118: 3.3 Road Transport 3.3.1 Configurat
- Page 119 and 120: Figure 3.15 shows an example of the
- Page 121 and 122: Road distance one way < 20 km 70 km
- Page 123 and 124: Haul distance is largely outside th
- Page 125 and 126: 3.6 Recommendations The nature of t
- Page 127 and 128: • The strategy offered lower tota
- Page 129 and 130: sugarcane billets are such that wit
- Page 131 and 132: • Transfer the whole tree product
- Page 133 and 134: Figure 4.5(b) Energy balance of con
- Page 135: 2010). Table 4.2 presents a summary
- Page 139 and 140: Nett Product Value ($/t) $475.00 $
- Page 141 and 142: Table 4.9 presents an estimation of
- Page 143 and 144: • Oil from leaf @ $2/kg • Synth
- Page 145 and 146: • The mallee oil would be extract
- Page 147 and 148: 5. Industry and Business Structures
- Page 149 and 150: is conducted into tariff levels on
- Page 151 and 152: Bx is % brix in first expressed jui
- Page 153 and 154: Hildebrand (2002) estimated that th
- Page 155 and 156: also has a flow on effect to the sp
- Page 157 and 158: Sugar Industry Illustrative Example
- Page 159 and 160: with super size multi-lift bins ove
- Page 161 and 162: farmer vs. harvester) is the next l
- Page 163 and 164: 6. Supply Chain Planning and Manage
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 6.1 Building blocks of the s
- Page 167 and 168: weighed against the costs of operat
- Page 169 and 170: • There is close contact between
- Page 171 and 172: 6.4 Planning, Management Tools and
- Page 173 and 174: • Harvest and transport logistics
- Page 175 and 176: interface. The system allows users
- Page 177 and 178: Case Study 6.2 - Model Application
- Page 179 and 180: Relationships between sectors and p
- Page 181 and 182: 7. Supply Chain Modelling and Econo
- Page 183 and 184: It was assumed that there was a fif
- Page 185 and 186: Table 7.2 Scenario two capital equi
Because <strong>of</strong> the extraction <strong>of</strong> the oil component, an alternative boutique use <strong>of</strong> leaf and twig could be<br />
as feedstock for compost however additional agricultural waste would probably be required to achieve<br />
correct component ratios. Some synergies may exist with abattoirs with respect to the production <strong>of</strong><br />
high value compost however the concentrations <strong>of</strong> heavy metals in the leaf material and or extracted<br />
liquid could be an issue.<br />
Table 4.3 presents data on the production <strong>of</strong> mallee oil. The extraction costs are nominal based on the<br />
energy requirement for the extraction process on gas costs only. In an industrial process, energy would<br />
be supplied from combustion <strong>of</strong> used product, with the nominal saving being absorbed by fixed and<br />
variable costs associated with the process.<br />
Table 4.3 Value <strong>of</strong> feedstock components for Mallee Oil for boutique and industrial use<br />
Oil Value ($/kg) $10 $2<br />
Tree component leaf & twig whole tree leaf & twig whole tree<br />
Extraction cost ($/kg) $ 0.84 $ 1.08 $ 0.84 $ 1.08<br />
Product Value ($/kg) $9.16 $8.92 $1.16 $0.92<br />
Product yield (kg/gt) 18.0 10.5 18.0 10.5<br />
Value/gt freshweight at $ 164.81 $ 93.69 $ 20.81 $ 9.69<br />
factory<br />
Residual product<br />
Wet leaf & twig<br />
+ separated<br />
woodchip<br />
Wet leaf & twig<br />
& woodchip<br />
Wet leaf & twig<br />
+ separated<br />
woodchip<br />
Wet leaf & twig<br />
& woodchip<br />
Residual Product Value<br />
* 100% <strong>of</strong><br />
woodchip<br />
* 65% <strong>of</strong> leaf &<br />
twig<br />
* 90% <strong>of</strong><br />
woodchip<br />
* 65% <strong>of</strong> leaf &<br />
twig<br />
* 100% <strong>of</strong><br />
woodchip<br />
* 65% <strong>of</strong> leaf &<br />
twig<br />
* 90% <strong>of</strong><br />
woodchip<br />
* 65% <strong>of</strong> leaf &<br />
twig<br />
Table 4.3 indicates that:<br />
• For the boutique market with an oil price <strong>of</strong> $10/kg ex-factory, feedstock value at the factory is<br />
in the order <strong>of</strong> $165/green tonne for leaf and twig components <strong>of</strong> the tree if pre-separated, or<br />
$94/green tonne for the whole tree if the entire harvested product is processes.<br />
• The value <strong>of</strong> leaf and twig based on industrial oil prices are $21/green tonne for leaf and twig if<br />
separated prior to the process or $10/green tonne if the whole tree is run through the extraction<br />
process. The increased thermal requirement to process the whole tree instead <strong>of</strong> leaf (and twigs)<br />
only equates to approximately $0.24/kg <strong>of</strong> oil. Whilst this is barely significant in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
boutique oil, it is highly significant in the economics <strong>of</strong> industrial oil.<br />
These costs indicate that oil extraction for industrial use is not a viable “stand-alone” use <strong>of</strong> harvested<br />
malle in a large scale industry; however oil extraction from the separated leaf and twig material can<br />
potentially give an additional income stream. After oil extraction has been undertaken:<br />
• If pre-separated, the full value <strong>of</strong> the woodchip would still be available, however if the<br />
woodchip was subjected to steam extraction, some degradation would have occurred, along<br />
with an increase in moisture content;<br />
• The reduced alkali levels in leaf and twig material can be anticipated to reduce potential<br />
problems associated with combustion <strong>of</strong> these products, thus potentially increasing their value;<br />
• Work at Curtin <strong>University</strong> ( http://asdi.curtin.edu.au/csrp/projects/4c2.html) indicates that after<br />
oil extraction, leaf and twig material actually convert into a higher value metallurgical charcoal<br />
than wood.<br />
• To capitalise on this value, it would be necessary to efficiently re-dry and process the material.<br />
The energy required to achieve this would be equivalent to combusting approximately 35% <strong>of</strong><br />
the material.<br />
113