25.12.2013 Views

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Products, Processing and Impact on<br />

Supply Chain<br />

Mallee, in whatever form an industry finally takes, will be a biomass production industry, and the<br />

potential for the industry to be viable will be dependent on minimising costs and maximising the value<br />

which can be extracted from the raw material harvested. From these viewpoints, the crop can be<br />

compared and contrasted with Sugarcane.<br />

This chapter will first overview products from and processing <strong>of</strong> sugarcane, how this has evolved in<br />

response to the reduction in the relative pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> sugar, as the primary product, over time. The<br />

range <strong>of</strong> products which can be produced from Mallee will then be discussed, the impact <strong>of</strong> large scale<br />

production on potential product value will be assessed and supply chain implications evaluated.<br />

4.1 Product Options and Supply Chain Implications: Sugarcane.<br />

4.1.1 Product options<br />

Over the past three decades, paradigm shifts have occurred in sugar industries around the world. The<br />

primary product <strong>of</strong> sugar industries around the world has traditionally been crystal sugar. Electricity<br />

production was primarily for internal consumption at the sugar mill (Hobson, 2003) and environs,<br />

with export levels optimised to limit the cyclic draw on the electricity grid during start-up <strong>of</strong> high load<br />

current operations, such as sugar centrifuging.<br />

Key issues relating to the traditional sugar mill configuration include:<br />

• To maximise economic benefit, sucrose recovery has traditionally been maximised.<br />

• Because <strong>of</strong> the limited economic benefit (low price, limited market) traditionally gained from<br />

electricity generation, this was limited to the amount required to operate the factory. Some<br />

optimisation <strong>of</strong> generation capacity was based on factory internal peak loads and the relative<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> imported and exported power. Factories which were not connected to grid power had<br />

to have sufficient installed generation capacity to operate in “stand-alone” mode.<br />

• Some “value adding” <strong>of</strong> the molasses was undertaken by the production <strong>of</strong> potable or<br />

industrial alcohol either at a mill based facility or at stand-alone facilities.<br />

• Bagasse was typically a disposal issue, so the boilers were designed to absorb the near<br />

maximum bagasse flow rates. Overall thermal efficiency <strong>of</strong> a sugar factory, including the<br />

internal process thermal requirement was typically in the order <strong>of</strong> less than 20% (Lavarack,<br />

2004). In some countries “bagasse furnaces” were utilised in sugarmills to dispose <strong>of</strong> excess<br />

bagasse.<br />

The most significant first challenge to this paradigm was the “Proalcohol” program in Brazil. The<br />

fundamental changes (Wright et.al. 2007) in this, relative to the traditional strategy included:<br />

• Whilst the overall concept was to produce ethanol, R&D indicated that there were substantial<br />

benefits in a strategy <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> both sugar and ethanol in a combined process, as<br />

significant bio-chemical synergies were present as the two processes were integrated.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!