Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figures<br />
Figure 1.1<br />
The cropping and pasture land in the 300-600 mm mean annual rainfall zones <strong>of</strong> WA<br />
(top) and south eastern Australia (bottom) ...................................................................... 6<br />
Figure 1.2 The cane growing regions on the NE seaboard <strong>of</strong> Australia (source :<br />
www.canegrowers.com.au) ............................................................................................. 7<br />
Figure 1.3 Two row alley farming on the contour near Trayning WA. ............................................ 9<br />
Figure 1.4 The mallee belt system integrated with agriculture ...................................................... 13<br />
Figure 1.5 Six year old E. loxophleba subsp. Lissophloia .............................................................. 16<br />
Figure 2.1 Layout <strong>of</strong> Australian standard ‘chopped cane’ sugarcane harvester ............................. 30<br />
Figure 2.2 Biosystems Engineering prototype woody crop harvester ............................................ 32<br />
Figure 2.3 Ex-harvester mallee biomass (left) and after screening (right). .................................... 35<br />
Figure 2.4 Wheel spacing 1.5 m row spacing – 1.85 m wheel spacing .......................................... 37<br />
Figure 2.5 Wheel spacing: 1.85 m wheel spacing - dual row ......................................................... 37<br />
Figure 2.6<br />
Figure 2.7<br />
The top <strong>of</strong> a mallee lignotuber removed by the harvester’s saw (above) and the<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> the site with cleanly cut stumps after passage <strong>of</strong> the harvester (right) ..... 44<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> crop size on maximum harvester (tracked machines) delivery rate in burnt and<br />
green cane ...................................................................................................................... 46<br />
Figure 2.8 Bulk densities <strong>of</strong> whole-cane ........................................................................................ 49<br />
Figure 2.9 Loading a chip truck with mallee biomass using a roadside chipper ............................ 49<br />
Figure 2.10<br />
GPS harvester tracks in a harvested field, coloured by speed (Beattie and Crossley<br />
2006) .............................................................................................................................. 63<br />
Figure 2.11 Effect <strong>of</strong> group size on harvesting costs (Sandell and Agnew, 2002) ........................... 72<br />
Figure 2.12 Effect <strong>of</strong> crop yield on harvesting costs (Sandell and Agnew, 2002) ........................... 73<br />
Figure 2.13 Effect <strong>of</strong> row length on cost <strong>of</strong> harvesting .................................................................... 73<br />
Figure 2.14<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> harvester pour rate and annual tonnage per harvester upon cost <strong>of</strong><br />
biomass harvested and delivered to field edge .............................................................. 74<br />
Figure 3.1 Tractor drawn side tipper .............................................................................................. 83<br />
Figure 3.2 Tractor drawn trailer with end lift and cross-elevator unload ....................................... 83<br />
Figure 3.3 Articulated self–propelled with end lift and cross elevator unload .............................. 84<br />
xii