Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland Download (4Mb) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern Queensland
• Transporter - Sugarcane Infield – Wheel • Transporter - Sugarcane Infield – Tracked • Transporter - Sugarcane Infield – Excess Length For each category of infield sugarcane transport equipment there are three options of road access allowable under conditional registration. These include; • Limited access registration — vehicles are predominantly restricted to worksites and designated areas. • Zone access registration — vehicles are allowed to travel on road for distances of 20 kilometres (km), 40 km, or 80 km depending on their areas of operation in Queensland. • Unrestricted access registration — appropriate vehicles will be allowed unlimited access, but may still have conditions that apply to the time of operation. Mallee System As transport regulations vary from state to state, licensing of infield transport that travel on public roads may be required. This will involve the mallee industry working with the WA Department of Transport and other transport regulators in each of the states to define appropriate guidelines for conditional registration. In the regions where mallees are grown, oversize farm machinery is commonly driven on public roads, such as contract grain harvesters that are overwidth, and towing long combs, that travel the northsouth extent of the Queensland to Victoria grain belt. These also tend to be the regions where vehicles are permitted the greatest overall length. This may be in contrast with the sugar industry which is located along the eastern seaboard often in close proximity to urban and semi-rural lifestyle properties. However there will be need to consult with the various transport regulators, especially with regard to technical issues, for example, the use of high speed tractors towing large capacity trailers in road train configurations. 3.2.5 Discussion In sugarcane systems the cost of infield transport varies up to $9 per tonne according to distance and speed when these factors are analysed individually. Haulout fuel use is about 50% of harvester fuel usage. Modelled estimates for mallee indicate that infield transport will cost about 75% of the per-tonne cost of harvesting, and haulouts will use about 60% of the fuel used by the harvester. These proportions reflect the assumptions that the two haulouts combined are almost as capital intensive as the harvester and there are two haulout operators for every harvester operator. Harvesting will also be particularly energy intensive (due to the chipper) and a haulout does not need to operate under full load while returning empty to the harvester or waiting while the other haulout is being loaded. Monitoring of all fuel use should be considered when a commercial system is developed. The mallee industry should consult with the transport regulators in all states to define appropriate guidelines for conditional registration if required. 93
3.3 Road Transport 3.3.1 Configuration Sugar System The most common type of road transport is the multi-lift semi-trailer carrying one single multi-lift bin at a time. Figure 3.13 illustrates the multi-lift bin. With this configuration the semi-trailer unloads the multi-lift bin onto a level surface (usually a dedicated pad). The infield haulouts load straight into the multi-lift bin as shown in Figure 3.1. This system is in use in all NSW mill areas and predominant in Bundaberg and in North Queensland on the Atherton Tablelands. The cane is unloaded from the bin whilst the bin is on the multi-lift trailer. To unload the cane from the bin, the multi-lift trailer is hydraulically raised from the front and the rear door of the bin pivots from the top of the bin and is manually opened. The cane exits under gravity from the rear of the bin. Figure 3.13 Multi-lift semi-trailer bin In other areas with road transport (e.g. Maryborough, Mossman) there are semi-trailer combinations of multi-lift bins and direct loading of multiple roll on/roll off railway bins or B-Double trailers capable of carrying three, 12 tonne transfer bins. NSWSMC when evaluating materials handling options for whole-of-crop harvesting investigated several alternate systems including the German, Fliegl Gigant push-off trailer (see Figure 3.14). Whilst of interest, such units require a complete change in the materials handling equipment as they were not compatible with the existing multi-lift system. High capital cost and potentially greater unloading times were additional reasons why NSWSMC did not pursue these types of systems. NSWSMC did not consider side tipping trailers as this did not suit existing unloading configurations at the mill. 94
- Page 65 and 66: Table 2.1 Harvester Comparison Tabl
- Page 67 and 68: The quality of cut may be less impo
- Page 69 and 70: ate than a 170 tonne/ha crop of sta
- Page 71 and 72: Dry Leaf 6.1 - 3.5 17.0 58.9 53.2 T
- Page 73 and 74: Bulk density will be a key consider
- Page 75 and 76: Table 2.4 EM levels in cane supply
- Page 77 and 78: L/T L/T 60 0.97 0.71 80 0.92 0.66 1
- Page 79 and 80: Total 7.5-26 16.5 Mallee System The
- Page 81 and 82: • waiting for mill delivery of em
- Page 83 and 84: perhaps at 10 - 20 km intervals. Th
- Page 85 and 86: transport arrangements, harvest gro
- Page 87 and 88: contractors and growers, and the fa
- Page 89 and 90: experience of the sugar industry wi
- Page 91 and 92: Table 2.11 Alternative harvest paym
- Page 93 and 94: onto the harvester. BR+F still send
- Page 95 and 96: Repairs and maintenance 2.10 Capita
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 2.14 and Table 2.14 describe
- Page 99 and 100: Sichter et al. (2005)), harvest and
- Page 101 and 102: Transport efficiencies may be possi
- Page 103 and 104: 3. Transport and Storage Systems Tr
- Page 105 and 106: same time, the potential problems o
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 3.3 Articulated self-propell
- Page 109 and 110: • The harvester will not have any
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 3.7 Gross mass compared with
- Page 113 and 114: external factors dramatically impac
- Page 115: Figure 3.11 The effect of haulout t
- Page 119 and 120: Figure 3.15 shows an example of the
- Page 121 and 122: Road distance one way < 20 km 70 km
- Page 123 and 124: Haul distance is largely outside th
- Page 125 and 126: 3.6 Recommendations The nature of t
- Page 127 and 128: • The strategy offered lower tota
- Page 129 and 130: sugarcane billets are such that wit
- Page 131 and 132: • Transfer the whole tree product
- Page 133 and 134: Figure 4.5(b) Energy balance of con
- Page 135 and 136: 2010). Table 4.2 presents a summary
- Page 137 and 138: 4.4.2 Activated charcoal Activated
- Page 139 and 140: Nett Product Value ($/t) $475.00 $
- Page 141 and 142: Table 4.9 presents an estimation of
- Page 143 and 144: • Oil from leaf @ $2/kg • Synth
- Page 145 and 146: • The mallee oil would be extract
- Page 147 and 148: 5. Industry and Business Structures
- Page 149 and 150: is conducted into tariff levels on
- Page 151 and 152: Bx is % brix in first expressed jui
- Page 153 and 154: Hildebrand (2002) estimated that th
- Page 155 and 156: also has a flow on effect to the sp
- Page 157 and 158: Sugar Industry Illustrative Example
- Page 159 and 160: with super size multi-lift bins ove
- Page 161 and 162: farmer vs. harvester) is the next l
- Page 163 and 164: 6. Supply Chain Planning and Manage
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 6.1 Building blocks of the s
• Transporter - Sugarcane Infield – Wheel<br />
• Transporter - Sugarcane Infield – Tracked<br />
• Transporter - Sugarcane Infield – Excess Length<br />
For each category <strong>of</strong> infield sugarcane transport equipment there are three options <strong>of</strong> road access<br />
allowable under conditional registration. These include;<br />
• Limited access registration — vehicles are predominantly restricted to worksites and<br />
designated areas.<br />
• Zone access registration — vehicles are allowed to travel on road for distances <strong>of</strong><br />
20 kilometres (km), 40 km, or 80 km depending on their areas <strong>of</strong> operation in <strong>Queensland</strong>.<br />
• Unrestricted access registration — appropriate vehicles will be allowed unlimited access, but<br />
may still have conditions that apply to the time <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />
Mallee System<br />
As transport regulations vary from state to state, licensing <strong>of</strong> infield transport that travel on public<br />
roads may be required. This will involve the mallee industry working with the WA Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Transport and other transport regulators in each <strong>of</strong> the states to define appropriate guidelines for<br />
conditional registration.<br />
In the regions where mallees are grown, oversize farm machinery is commonly driven on public roads,<br />
such as contract grain harvesters that are overwidth, and towing long combs, that travel the northsouth<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Queensland</strong> to Victoria grain belt. These also tend to be the regions where vehicles<br />
are permitted the greatest overall length. This may be in contrast with the sugar industry which is<br />
located along the eastern seaboard <strong>of</strong>ten in close proximity to urban and semi-rural lifestyle<br />
properties. However there will be need to consult with the various transport regulators, especially with<br />
regard to technical issues, for example, the use <strong>of</strong> high speed tractors towing large capacity trailers in<br />
road train configurations.<br />
3.2.5 Discussion<br />
In sugarcane systems the cost <strong>of</strong> infield transport varies up to $9 per tonne according to distance and<br />
speed when these factors are analysed individually. Haulout fuel use is about 50% <strong>of</strong> harvester fuel<br />
usage.<br />
Modelled estimates for mallee indicate that infield transport will cost about 75% <strong>of</strong> the per-tonne cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> harvesting, and haulouts will use about 60% <strong>of</strong> the fuel used by the harvester. These proportions<br />
reflect the assumptions that the two haulouts combined are almost as capital intensive as the harvester<br />
and there are two haulout operators for every harvester operator. Harvesting will also be particularly<br />
energy intensive (due to the chipper) and a haulout does not need to operate under full load while<br />
returning empty to the harvester or waiting while the other haulout is being loaded. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> all<br />
fuel use should be considered when a commercial system is developed.<br />
The mallee industry should consult with the transport regulators in all states to define appropriate<br />
guidelines for conditional registration if required.<br />
93