25.12.2013 Views

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

538 WÜNDISCH<br />

3. Means for Achieving Pre-Specified Policy Goals<br />

The claim that economic management approaches rely on an incomplete understanding of<br />

human psychology has some plausibility given that neoclassical economic models indeed rely<br />

upon the assumption that humans are exclusively self-interested. On the one hand this claim<br />

implies a theoretical problem for neoclassical economics depending on how significantly and<br />

under what kind of circumstances humans are differently motivated. However, as purely<br />

theoretical questions are less relevant for public policy this problem does not need to be<br />

addressed here. On the other hand this claim could well imply a problem for the theory’s<br />

applicability. However, in the context of management approaches to climate change – and the<br />

question of whether the means these management approaches employ are well chosen to<br />

guide individual actions toward particular pre-specified ends – the potential problem of<br />

applicability does not materialize.<br />

Recall that Jamieson’s first critique implies that management approaches fail to be effective<br />

because it is false that “the perception of self-interest is the only motivator for human <strong>bei</strong>ngs”<br />

[emphasis mine] (Jamieson 1992: 143). Like many authors before and after him, Jamieson<br />

makes plausible that in fact humans are also motivated by factors other than the perception of<br />

their self-interest such as “concern for family and friends, and religious, moral, and political<br />

ideals” (Jamieson 1992: 144). 2 Although this is true, it evidently does not spell trouble for<br />

economic management approaches for all they rely upon is that in the particular choice<br />

situation that is relevant to a particular approach – be it taxation, regulation, or subsidies –<br />

one strong motivator of human action is the perception of self-interest.<br />

Take, for example, the standard case of a tax on CO 2 emissions. There might be many ways to<br />

motivate humans to reduce their CO 2 emissions. However, such alternatives neither imply<br />

that an appropriate tax on CO 2 emissions would be ineffective nor that it would be inefficient.<br />

As long as demand for CO 2 emissions – or rather the products and their production processes<br />

that cause them – is price sensitive, such a tax is effective. One look at consumer decisions at<br />

the fuel pump or the thermostat vindicates economic management approaches with respect to<br />

the means they employ to achieve pre-specified ends.<br />

That management approaches which target a narrow perception of self-interest are effective<br />

in a context where that self-interest provides a strong motivator for specific consumption<br />

decisions does not, however, mean that these approaches always work. If other motivators<br />

take center stage or the perception of self-interest cannot easily be addressed, management<br />

approaches need to be adapted. As economists are not wedded to the neoclassical paradigm,<br />

they can integrate these different motivations into management approaches.<br />

Consider the example of the anti-littering campaign “Don’t Mess with Texas” which was<br />

initiated by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation in 1985 and<br />

reduced roadside littering by more than 70% in the following five years alone (Stafford and<br />

Hartman 2012). Strict anti-littering regulations in combination with fines had limited success<br />

due to prohibitive enforcement costs. It was and is simply not feasible to patrol highways so<br />

extensively that the probability of conviction for littering in combination with a justifiable fine<br />

for individual violations produces a sufficient financial incentive to desist from littering. 3<br />

Therefore, the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation amended their<br />

management approach in order to draw on state-specific conceptions of honor and pride to<br />

increase social pressure and exact change. The widely communicated slogan Don’t Mess with<br />

Texas “cast litterers as ‘outsiders’ or ‘imposters’ insulting the honor of Texas” (Stafford and<br />

Hartman 2012). This effort to reframe the meaning of littering within Texas does not directly<br />

2<br />

For a particularly influential example see Hume 1751. For an overview of the current debate about<br />

altruism within moral psychology see Stich, Doris, and Roedder 2010.<br />

3<br />

For the general concept that underlies this particular assessment see Becker 1968.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!