Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PROBLEMS OF PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES 463 Davis, J. K. 2002: ‘The concept of precedent autonomy’, Bioethics 16(2), 114-133. Davis, J. K. 2007: ‘Precedent Autonomy, Advance directives, and End-of-Life Care’, in: B. Steinbock (ed.) 2007, 349-374. Davis, J. K. 2008: ‘How to justify enforcing a Ulysses contract when Ulysses is competent to refuse’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18(1), 87-106. DeGrazia, D. 1999: ‘Advance Directives, Dementia, and “the Someone Else Problem”’, Bioethics 13(5), 373-391. DeGrazia, D. 2005: Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dresser, R.: ‘Advance directives, self-determination, and personal identity’, in C. Hackler, R. Moseles, and D.E. Vawter (eds.) 1989, 155-170. Dworkin, G. 1983: ‘Paternalism’, in: R. Sartorius (ed.) 1983, 19-34. Dworkin, G. 1988: The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elster, J. 1979: Ulysses and the sirens. Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Feinberg, J. 1986: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Vol. III. Harm to self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grisso, T., P.S. Appelbaum, and C. Hill-Fotouhi 1997: ‘The MacCAT-T: A Clinicl Tool to Assess Patients’ Capacities to Make Treatment Decisions’, Psychiatric Services 48(11), 1415-1419. Hackler, C., R. Moseley, and D.E. Vawter 1989: Advance directives in medicine. New York: Praeger. Hallich, O. 2011: ‘Selbstbindungen und medizinischer Paternalismus. Zum normativen Status von "Odysseus-Anweisungen"’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 65, 151-172. Helmchen, H. 2010: Ethics in psychiatry: European contributions. International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine: Vol. 45. Dordrecht: Springer. Holland, S. 2012: Arguing about bioethics. New York: Routledge. Jennings, B. 2007: ‘Autonomy’, in B. Steinbock (ed.), 72-90. Kennett, J. 2007: ‘Mental Disorder, Moral Agency, and the Self’, in B. Steinbock (ed.) 2007, 90-114. Kuhse, H., and P. Singer 2009: A Companion to Bioethics. 2 nd edition. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell. Lidz, C. W., A. Meisel, M. Osterweis, J.L. Holden, J.H. Marx, and M.R. Munetz 2012: ‘Barriers to Informed Consent’, in S. Holland (ed.) 2012, 299-307. Landwehr, C. 2007: Selbstbestimmung durch Patientenverfügung. Regensburg: Roderer. Mackenzie, C. and N. Stoljar 1999: Relational autonomy. Feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press. Nationale Ethikkommission im Bereich Humanmedizin 2011: Patientenverfügung. Stellungnahme Nr. 17/2011. Retrieved from www.nek-cne.ch. (08/21/2012). Nationaler Ethikrat 2005: Patientenverfügung – Ein Instrument der Selbstbestimmung. Stellungnahme. Retrieved from www.ethikrat.org. (08/21/2012). Olzen, D., and F. Schneider 2010: ‘Das Patientenverfügungsgesetz (PatVG) vom 1. 9. 2009 – Eine erste Bilanz. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Aus<strong>wir</strong>kungen auf die Unterbringung psychisch Kranker’, Medizinrecht 28(11), 745-751. O'Neill, O. 2002: Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parfit, D. 1984: Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
464 AICHER Quante, M. 1999: ‘Precedent Autonomy and Personal Identity’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9(4), 365-81. Radden, J. 1994: ‘Second Thoughts: Revoking Decisions Over One’s Own Future’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54(4), 787-801. Radden, J. 2004: ‘Identity: personal identity, characterization, identity and mental disorder’, in J. Radden (ed.) 2004, 133-146 Radden, J. (ed.) 2004: The Philosophy of psychiatry: a companion. New York: Oxford University Press. Radoilska, L. 2012: Autonomy and mental disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Radoilska, L.: ‘Introduction: personal autonomy, decisional capacity, and mental disorder’, in L. Radoilska (ed.) 2012, ix-xli. Rhoden, N. K. 1990: ‘The Limits of Legal Objectivity’, North Carolina Law Review 68, 845- 865. Ricoeur, P. 1991: ‘Narrative Identity’, Philosophy Today 35(1), 73-81. Sartorius, R. 1983: Paternalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Schermer, M. 2001: The Different Faces of Autonomy. Patient Autonomy in Ethical Theory and Hospital Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Srebnik, D. S., and La Fond, J. Q. 1999: ‘Advance Directives for Mental Health Treatment’, Psychiatric Services 50(7), 919-925. Srebnik, D. 2005: ‘Issues in applying advance directives to psychiatric care in the United States’, Australasian Journal on Ageing 24, 42-45. Steinbock, B. 2007: Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Swanson, J.W., Van McCrary, S., Swartz, M.S., Elbogen, E.B., and Van Dorn, R. A. 2006: ‘Superseding Psychiatric Advance Directives: Ethical and Legal Considerations’, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 34(3), 385-94. Szasz, T. 1982: ‘The psychiatric will’, American Psychologist 37(7), 762-770. Van Willigenburg, T., and P.J.J. Delaere 2005: ‘Protecting Autonomy as Authenticity Using Ulysses Contracts’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30(4), 395-409. Vollmann, J. 2008: Patientenselbstbestimmung und Selbstbestimmungsfähigkeit. Beiträge zur klinischen Ethik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Page 1 and 2:
Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen
Page 3 and 4:
Vorwort Vom 17.-20.9. 2012 fand unt
Page 5 and 6:
4. Philosophie des Geistes 210 Theo
Page 7 and 8:
1. Sprachphilosophie
Page 9 and 10:
8 DON’T ASK, LOOK! 2. A Simple Mo
Page 11 and 12:
10 DON’T ASK, LOOK! other hand, p
Page 13 and 14:
12 DON’T ASK, LOOK! (BNC); for Am
Page 15 and 16:
14 DON’T ASK, LOOK! ‘wishing’
Page 17 and 18:
Rede über fiktive Kontexte David B
Page 19 and 20:
18 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE Bezi
Page 21 and 22:
20 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE Da d
Page 23 and 24:
22 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE Russ
Page 25 and 26:
24 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE Cons
Page 27 and 28:
26 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE viel
Page 29 and 30:
28 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE (9)
Page 31 and 32:
30 REDE ÜBER FIKTIVE KONTEXTE Da P
Page 33 and 34:
The Ineliminability of Non-Nominal
Page 35 and 36:
34 DOLBY So whether ‘∃F (Ann is
Page 37 and 38:
36 DOLBY proposition expressed by
Page 39 and 40:
38 DOLBY MacBride, F. 2006a: ‘Pre
Page 41 and 42:
40 EL KASSAR 2. Das Regelfolgen-Pro
Page 43 and 44:
42 EL KASSAR Lebewesen auf fundamen
Page 45 and 46:
44 EL KASSAR Ginsborgs „anthropol
Page 47 and 48:
46 EL KASSAR Literatur Allison, H.
Page 49 and 50:
48 HARTH (4) Not (A believes that P
Page 51 and 52:
50 HARTH platitudes there are extra
Page 53 and 54:
52 HARTH P is stably assertible for
Page 55 and 56:
54 HARTH the parties involved has m
Page 57 and 58:
56 HARTH improvement of S*, i.e. if
Page 59 and 60:
58 HARTH Coliva and Morruzzi 2012:
Page 61 and 62:
Has Vagueness Really No Function in
Page 63 and 64:
62 LANIUS Accordingly, we can disti
Page 65 and 66:
64 LANIUS (P6*) Some Y lies with re
Page 67 and 68:
66 LANIUS fact, I think that one ca
Page 69 and 70:
68 LANIUS verdicts in absolute bord
Page 71 and 72:
A Single-Type Ontology for Natural
Page 73 and 74:
72 LIEFKE In particular, Property 0
Page 75 and 76:
74 LIEFKE c. Mary believes that Joh
Page 77 and 78:
76 LIEFKE of a streamlined variant
Page 79 and 80:
78 LIEFKE attributed property. 4 In
Page 81 and 82:
80 LIEFKE This completes our descri
Page 83 and 84:
82 LIEFKE (15) {w s | [[John e]] ex
Page 85 and 86:
84 LIEFKE Church, A. 1940: ‘A For
Page 87 and 88:
86 MARX Redundanz ebenso aus wie Un
Page 89 and 90:
88 MARX Wilson schlägt zwei altern
Page 91 and 92:
90 MARX Vertreter der Relevanztheor
Page 93 and 94:
92 MARX schweren Fehler begangen ha
Page 95 and 96:
94 MARX Um ihren Status als vorherr
Page 97 and 98:
The Fundamental Question of Metaphy
Page 99 and 100:
98 LOOK article ought to be conside
Page 101 and 102:
100 LOOK Although premise (3) seems
Page 103 and 104:
102 LOOK metaphysical nihilism can
Page 105 and 106:
Why Dispositions Are Not Higher-ord
Page 107 and 108:
106 MUGG 2. Shoemaker’s Arguments
Page 109 and 110:
108 MUGG avoid such speculations wh
Page 111 and 112:
110 MUGG The regress problems Marti
Page 113 and 114:
112 OLIVA CÓRDOBA sharp contrast t
Page 115 and 116:
114 OLIVA CÓRDOBA admit point acti
Page 117 and 118:
116 PORRO whether the activity of s
Page 119 and 120:
118 PORRO ‘There are particles ar
Page 121 and 122:
120 PORRO counting method should be
Page 123 and 124:
122 PORRO Bennett says the nihilist
Page 125 and 126:
124 PORRO References Bennett, K. (2
Page 127 and 128:
Regularity Theories of Mechanistic
Page 129 and 130:
128 HARBECKE The philosophical inve
Page 131 and 132:
130 HARBECKE 5. Material Commonalit
Page 133 and 134:
132 HARBECKE At this point it is no
Page 135 and 136:
134 HARBECKE Davis, S., S. Butcher,
Page 137 and 138:
136 HAUSWALD dafür plädieren, den
Page 139 and 140:
138 HAUSWALD Unbestimmtheit aufweis
Page 141 and 142:
140 HAUSWALD eine entscheidende Rol
Page 143 and 144:
142 HAUSWALD (importance). Was aber
Page 145 and 146:
144 HAUSWALD Zu beachten ist die M
Page 147 and 148:
146 HAUSWALD Exemplare wie A 2 häu
Page 149 and 150:
Epistemische und nicht-epistemische
Page 151 and 152:
150 HIRSCH HADORN weiterer Grund si
Page 153 and 154:
152 HIRSCH HADORN struktureller Ad
Page 155 and 156:
154 HIRSCH HADORN eine moralische
Page 157 and 158:
156 HIRSCH HADORN wissenschaftliche
Page 159 and 160:
158 HIRSCH HADORN auch auf bloßen
Page 161 and 162:
160 HIRSCH HADORN - und J. Hardie 2
Page 163 and 164:
Causation, Dispositions, and Mathem
Page 165 and 166:
164 RÖHL 1.3 Options for Avoiding
Page 167 and 168:
166 RÖHL triggering event and poss
Page 169 and 170:
168 RÖHL direction), because Newto
Page 171 and 172:
170 RÖHL 5. Conclusion The conflic
Page 173 and 174:
Between Relativism and Absolutism?
Page 175 and 176:
174 SEIDEL but also the techniques
Page 177 and 178:
176 SEIDEL seen to suggest that the
Page 179 and 180:
178 SEIDEL there are good reasons f
Page 181 and 182:
180 SEIDEL - otherwise the thesis f
Page 183 and 184:
182 SEIDEL (b) Moderate Relativism
Page 185 and 186:
184 SEIDEL References Barnes, B. an
Page 187 and 188:
When Is It Rational to Believe a Ma
Page 189 and 190:
188 STELLING So what does all of th
Page 191 and 192:
190 STELLING extremely fast in some
Page 193 and 194:
192 STELLING Historically the start
Page 195 and 196:
194 STELLING we knew exactly what t
Page 197 and 198:
196 STELLING there is no finite pro
Page 199 and 200:
198 STELLING Lam, C. W. H., Thiel,
Page 201 and 202:
200 STRÖSSNER Principle of Statist
Page 203 and 204:
202 STRÖSSNER this is relevant, th
Page 205 and 206:
204 STRÖSSNER statements like “M
Page 207 and 208:
206 STRÖSSNER 4.1 Carnap’s Logic
Page 209 and 210:
208 STRÖSSNER Veltman’s results,
Page 211 and 212:
4. Philosophie des Geistes
Page 213 and 214:
212 BUKOW Figure 1. Gradual change
Page 215 and 216:
214 BUKOW Probabilistic rationality
Page 217 and 218:
216 BUKOW Mapping between cognition
Page 219 and 220:
218 BUKOW cognitive elements (lila,
Page 221 and 222:
220 BUKOW would be the ones we woul
Page 223 and 224:
222 BUKOW schemas evolve. This appl
Page 225 and 226:
Mechanistische Erklärung: Reduktiv
Page 227 and 228:
226 GUTSCHE Transkription und Trans
Page 229 and 230:
228 GUTSCHE Diese beiden Modelle (d
Page 231 and 232:
230 GUTSCHE verschiedene Perspektiv
Page 233 and 234:
232 GUTSCHE Oppenheim and Putnam re
Page 235 and 236:
234 GUTSCHE Es lässt sich also fes
Page 237 and 238:
Phenomenal Concepts - Still Battlin
Page 239 and 240:
238 MERGENTHALER CANSECO Psychophys
Page 241 and 242:
240 MERGENTHALER CANSECO 4. Deferen
Page 243 and 244:
242 MERGENTHALER CANSECO (4) That i
Page 245 and 246:
244 MERGENTHALER CANSECO occur. Let
Page 247 and 248:
246 MERGENTHALER CANSECO We see tha
Page 249 and 250:
248 MERGENTHALER CANSECO language t
Page 251 and 252:
Ein Dilemma für modale Argumente g
Page 253 and 254:
252 MÜLLER Dingen ist. Kripke hat
Page 255 and 256:
254 MÜLLER Erkenntnis, und Einsich
Page 257 and 258:
How We Know Our Senses Eva Schmidt
Page 259 and 260:
258 SCHMIDT of properties represent
Page 261 and 262:
260 SCHMIDT to the personal-level f
Page 263 and 264:
262 SCHMIDT rich flavour of a tomat
Page 265 and 266:
The arche of Cognition - Grounding
Page 267 and 268:
266 WEBER & VOSGERAU equations. 1 S
Page 269 and 270:
268 WEBER & VOSGERAU Understood in
Page 271 and 272:
270 WEBER & VOSGERAU clear idea of
Page 273 and 274:
272 WEBER & VOSGERAU Because of thi
Page 275 and 276:
274 WEBER & VOSGERAU impaired (impl
Page 277 and 278:
276 WEBER & VOSGERAU Mahon, B.Z., a
Page 279 and 280:
Integrating Evaluation and Affectiv
Page 281 and 282:
280 WILUTZKY regret) feel bad. This
Page 283 and 284:
282 WILUTZKY unwarranted, for repre
Page 285 and 286:
284 WILUTZKY experiential represent
Page 287 and 288:
286 WILUTZKY Montague, M. 2009: ‘
Page 289 and 290:
288 WUNDER 2. Nicht-menschliche Akt
Page 291 and 292:
290 WUNDER Kommen zwei Substanzen A
Page 293 and 294:
292 WUNDER Unless there is a princi
Page 295 and 296:
294 WUNDER gewisse Randbedingungen
Page 297 and 298:
296 WUNDER mehr Blätter verlieren
Page 299 and 300:
Explanatorisches Verstehen: Ein Def
Page 301 and 302:
300 BAUMBERGER globalen Erwärmung
Page 303 and 304:
302 BAUMBERGER 2.1.3 Erfassen einer
Page 305 and 306:
304 BAUMBERGER 3. Explanatorisches
Page 307 and 308:
306 BAUMBERGER aber nicht gänzlich
Page 309 and 310:
308 BAUMBERGER verstehen kann, waru
Page 311 and 312:
310 BAUMBERGER spezifizierten Fakto
Page 313 and 314:
How Gettier Helps to Understand Jus
Page 315 and 316:
314 HOFMANN issue is independent of
Page 317 and 318:
316 HOFMANN same beliefs as we do i
Page 319 and 320:
Contextualism and Gradability - A R
Page 321 and 322:
320 JASTER All the crucial things t
Page 323 and 324:
322 JASTER quoted. The proposal he
Page 325 and 326:
Intuitions, Heuristics, and Metapho
Page 327 and 328:
326 FISCHER Effortless processes al
Page 329 and 330:
328 FISCHER The first two steps are
Page 331 and 332:
330 FISCHER extension of terms, in
Page 333 and 334:
332 FISCHER activation spreads out
Page 335 and 336:
334 FISCHER This alignment facilita
Page 337 and 338:
336 FISCHER explains: ‘When I spe
Page 339 and 340:
338 FISCHER Gerken, M. 2011: ‘Epi
Page 341 and 342:
What are Epistemic Duties? Andrea K
Page 343 and 344:
342 KRUSE principle is also necessa
Page 345 and 346:
344 KRUSE version of this principle
Page 347 and 348:
346 KRUSE an epistemic agent exerci
Page 349 and 350:
348 KRUSE whereby the latter do not
Page 351 and 352:
350 KRUSE implies can” principle
Page 353 and 354:
The Method of Reflective Equilibriu
Page 355 and 356:
354 LANGKAU 3. Reflective Equilibri
Page 357 and 358:
356 LANGKAU 4. Reflective Equilibri
Page 359 and 360:
358 LANGKAU collective MRE. The vie
Page 361 and 362:
360 LANGKAU relativism, moral reali
Page 363 and 364:
362 LANGKAU Proponents of MRE might
Page 365 and 366:
364 LANGKAU — 1996: Justice and J
Page 367 and 368:
366 LÖWENSTEIN question demands -
Page 369 and 370:
368 LÖWENSTEIN On the fine-grained
Page 371 and 372:
370 LÖWENSTEIN How does this stop
Page 373 and 374:
Interrogative Formen des Wissens un
Page 375 and 376:
374 SCHMECHTIG Doch um welche Art v
Page 377 and 378:
376 SCHMECHTIG Das reduktionistisch
Page 379 and 380:
378 SCHMECHTIG Dass eine Frage wie
Page 381 and 382:
380 SCHMECHTIG Einstellungsprädika
Page 383 and 384:
382 SCHMECHTIG Interrogative, da st
Page 385 and 386:
384 SCHMECHTIG Antwort auf die eing
Page 387 and 388:
386 SCHMECHTIG nicht der Eindruck e
Page 389 and 390:
388 SCHMECHTIG Wissen das Ziel der
Page 391 and 392:
390 SCHMECHTIG Beck, S. & Rullmann,
Page 393 and 394:
Practical Knowledge Michael Schmitz
Page 395 and 396:
394 SCHMITZ knowledge Gettier cases
Page 397 and 398:
396 SCHMITZ knowledge is also possi
Page 399 and 400:
398 SCHMITZ nature of such knowledg
Page 401 and 402:
400 SCHMITZ Consider the following
Page 403 and 404:
402 SCHMITZ mountain by asking “A
Page 405 and 406:
6. Ästhetik und Religionsphilosoph
Page 407 and 408:
406 GEROGIORGAKIS number which rath
Page 409 and 410:
408 GEROGIORGAKIS sympathize with R
Page 411 and 412:
410 GEROGIORGAKIS In the lines to f
Page 413 and 414: Zur Rechtfertigung religiöser Übe
Page 415 and 416: 414 MOCKER b) Theoretische/Urteilsn
Page 417 and 418: 416 MOCKER normative Gründe für e
Page 419 and 420: Kunst und Moral Lisa Katharin Schma
Page 421 and 422: 420 SCHMALZRIED 2. Radikaler Autono
Page 423 and 424: 422 SCHMALZRIED 3.1 Radikaler Moral
Page 425 and 426: 424 SCHMALZRIED harmonisch, ausbala
Page 427 and 428: 426 SCHMALZRIED 4. Skizze einer plu
Page 429 and 430: 428 SCHMALZRIED 5.1 Argumente für
Page 431 and 432: 430 SCHMALZRIED 5.2 Argumente gegen
Page 433 and 434: 432 SCHMALZRIED Lisa Katharin Schma
Page 435 and 436: 434 SCHMALZRIED Posner, R. 1997:
Page 437 and 438: 436 SCHNEIDER unvollkommene) Versuc
Page 439 and 440: 438 SCHNEIDER (1) Keine geschaffene
Page 441 and 442: 440 SCHNEIDER (1) In der Begründun
Page 443 and 444: 442 SCHNEIDER setzt“ 34 . Der fre
Page 445 and 446: 444 SCHNEIDER können, bleibt - wie
Page 447 and 448: 446 SCHNEIDER 3° Reine Unterlassun
Page 449 and 450: 448 SCHNEIDER [Gott] bewahrt unser
Page 451 and 452: 7. Angewandte Ethik, politische Phi
Page 453 and 454: 452 AICHER important to acknowledge
Page 455 and 456: 454 AICHER oneself”. 17 Furthermo
Page 457 and 458: 456 AICHER 5. (Surrogate) Decision-
Page 459 and 460: 458 AICHER One reason for overridin
Page 461 and 462: 460 AICHER the narrative constructs
Page 463: 462 AICHER Discussion of philosophi
Page 467 and 468: 466 BLÖSER 1. Was heißt „faire
Page 469 and 470: 468 BLÖSER Alles in allem scheint
Page 471 and 472: 470 BLÖSER nehmen, wie für Rawls
Page 473 and 474: 472 BLÖSER 4.2 Vorwurf des fehlend
Page 475 and 476: 474 BLÖSER dem oben beschriebenen
Page 477 and 478: 476 BLÖSER Schaub, J. 2010: „Ide
Page 479 and 480: 478 BRATU von Freiheit, die gemäß
Page 481 and 482: 480 BRATU Menschen im Gefängnis od
Page 483 and 484: 482 BRATU voraussetzt; aber es sche
Page 485 and 486: 484 BRATU andere Taten - etwa das K
Page 487 and 488: 486 BRATU das liberale Prinzip offe
Page 489 and 490: 488 BRATU Christine Bratu Fakultät
Page 491 and 492: 490 GUTWALD 1. Paternalismus Es hat
Page 493 and 494: 492 GUTWALD Paternalismus unter lib
Page 495 and 496: 494 GUTWALD Mein Argument ist nun,
Page 497 and 498: 496 GUTWALD dargestellt gibt es der
Page 499 and 500: 498 GUTWALD seine Entscheidung, die
Page 501 and 502: 500 GUTWALD Englerth M., „Behavio
Page 503 and 504: 502 SCHICKHARDT inhaltlich näher b
Page 505 and 506: 504 SCHICKHARDT Leistungsfähigkeit
Page 507 and 508: 506 SCHICKHARDT eigenen Fähigkeite
Page 509 and 510: 508 SCHMIDT-PETRI Willen erklären
Page 511 and 512: 510 SCHMIDT-PETRI der durchaus als
Page 513 and 514: 512 SCHMIDT-PETRI Diese Anspruchsre
Page 515 and 516:
514 SCHMIDT-PETRI ihres Todes nicht
Page 517 and 518:
516 SCHMIDT-PETRI gewonnen, sodass
Page 519 and 520:
518 SCHMIDT-PETRI 4.3. Einwand 1: D
Page 521 and 522:
520 SCHMIDT-PETRI 5. Problem Hirnto
Page 523 and 524:
522 SCHMIDT-PETRI 5.4. Die dritte P
Page 525 and 526:
524 SCHMIDT-PETRI Schmidt-Petri, C.
Page 527 and 528:
526 SEIDEL between DE and ESV, I wi
Page 529 and 530:
528 SEIDEL held responsible) is int
Page 531 and 532:
530 SEIDEL obstacles in the way of
Page 533 and 534:
532 SEIDEL the socio-relational cri
Page 535 and 536:
534 SEIDEL (C) If a distribution D
Page 537 and 538:
The Role of Economic Analysis in Co
Page 539 and 540:
538 WÜNDISCH 3. Means for Achievin
Page 541 and 542:
540 WÜNDISCH For the sake of the f
Page 543 and 544:
542 WÜNDISCH policy regarding clim
Page 545 and 546:
544 WÜNDISCH irresponsible push to
Page 547 and 548:
546 WÜNDISCH This assessment carel
Page 549 and 550:
8. Normative Ethik, Metaethik, Hand
Page 551 and 552:
550 BURKARD beliefs in general. In
Page 553 and 554:
552 BURKARD Richard grew up a devou
Page 555 and 556:
554 BURKARD living together in smal
Page 557 and 558:
556 BURKARD epistemic standard form
Page 559 and 560:
558 BURKARD Kahane, G., Wiech, K.,
Page 561 and 562:
560 CÉSPEDES Late asymmetric overd
Page 563 and 564:
562 CÉSPEDES Evidential Decision T
Page 565 and 566:
564 CÉSPEDES would we say that the
Page 567 and 568:
566 CÉSPEDES earthquake at all. Th
Page 569 and 570:
568 CÉSPEDES dry match, I wonder w
Page 571 and 572:
570 CÉSPEDES between ranking theor
Page 573 and 574:
572 CÉSPEDES Lewis, D. 1981: ‘Ca
Page 575 and 576:
574 DI NUCCI ‘terror bombing’ a
Page 577 and 578:
576 DI NUCCI The philosophical disc
Page 579 and 580:
578 DI NUCCI same too: they both wa
Page 581 and 582:
580 DI NUCCI need not be the case:
Page 583 and 584:
582 DI NUCCI the munitions be geogr
Page 585 and 586:
584 DI NUCCI intentions; and (iii)
Page 587 and 588:
586 DI NUCCI underdetermined as to
Page 589 and 590:
Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Ou
Page 591 and 592:
590 DOHRN attached to John before J
Page 593 and 594:
592 DOHRN earlier. For although Mar
Page 595 and 596:
594 HOFFMANN Das Ziel meiner Argume
Page 597 and 598:
596 HOFFMANN Verträglichkeit mit d
Page 599 and 600:
598 HOFFMANN alltäglichen Moralver
Page 601 and 602:
600 HOFFMANN Explikation besteht da
Page 603 and 604:
602 HOFFMANN […] War Thomas Budde
Page 605 and 606:
604 HOFFMANN generell geltende Dieb
Page 607 and 608:
606 HOFFMANN Literatur Birnbacher,
Page 609 and 610:
608 HORST is true. Instead, what I
Page 611 and 612:
610 HORST that’s so, it is hard t
Page 613 and 614:
612 HORST Davidson, D. 1971: ‘Age
Page 615 and 616:
614 KÜHLER Im Folgenden werde ich
Page 617 and 618:
616 KÜHLER ebenfalls rein mentalen
Page 619 and 620:
618 KÜHLER Handlungsversuche und d
Page 621 and 622:
620 KÜHLER naheliegend und auch in
Page 623 and 624:
622 KÜHLER Kühler, M. 2012: „'R
Page 625 and 626:
624 LÖSCHKE Eine nonisomorphistisc
Page 627 and 628:
626 LÖSCHKE vorgebracht wurde, und
Page 629 and 630:
628 LÖSCHKE Vielmehr ist gemeint,
Page 631 and 632:
630 LÖSCHKE weniger komplex sein,
Page 633 and 634:
632 LÖSCHKE Hilfspflicht situative
Page 635 and 636:
634 LÖSCHKE Blick auf die Frage na
Page 637 and 638:
636 LÖSCHKE Handlungen bezogen sei
Page 639 and 640:
Willensschwäche - Eine Systematisi
Page 641 and 642:
640 LUMER Einsatzes einer solchen S
Page 643 and 644:
642 LUMER Optimalitätsurteile Absi
Page 645 and 646:
644 LUMER 1. Der erste Mechanismus
Page 647 and 648:
646 LUMER 5. Lösungsansätze zum N
Page 649 and 650:
648 LUMER zugrunde liegt, der für
Page 651 and 652:
650 LUMER (Abschn. 4-5; 7) gegebene
Page 653 and 654:
652 LUMER Christoph Lumer Universit
Page 655 and 656:
The Case against Consequentialism:
Page 657 and 658:
656 MUKERJI maximizes the good (or
Page 659 and 660:
658 MUKERJI Moore’s (1903/1959) c
Page 661 and 662:
660 MUKERJI The similarities that a
Page 663 and 664:
662 MUKERJI 3. Table: Construction
Page 665 and 666:
664 MUKERJI is, I hope, a promising
Page 667 and 668:
Moralischer Zufall und Kontrolle Ju
Page 669 and 670:
668 SCHÄLIKE wohl aber - so schein
Page 671 and 672:
670 SCHÄLIKE Wir können das Kontr
Page 673 and 674:
672 SCHÄLIKE Somit gilt: Entscheid
Page 675 and 676:
674 SCHÄLIKE 5. Psychologische Nac
Page 677 and 678:
What Makes Moral Values Queer? Juli
Page 679 and 680:
678 SCHÖNHERR moral properties has
Page 681 and 682:
680 SCHÖNHERR (i)P Moral propertie
Page 683 and 684:
682 SCHÖNHERR action has the moral
Page 685 and 686:
684 SCHÖNHERR that is too lax, one
Page 687 and 688:
686 SCHÖNHERR them. Hence, if (iia
Page 689 and 690:
688 SCHÖNHERR tell us why the one
Page 691 and 692:
Konsequentialistische Theorien und
Page 693 and 694:
692 WARMT stolz darüber ist, dass
Page 695 and 696:
694 WARMT Denkens ist es, moralisch
Page 697 and 698:
696 WARMT (3) und gemäß dem kriti
Page 699 and 700:
698 WARMT Damit ist die Handlungsch
Page 701 and 702:
700 WARMT moralischen Theorie, die
Page 703:
702 WARMT Koller, P. 1998: „Einwa
show all

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?